Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:48:34.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the symposium on institutional analysis, market processes, and interdisciplinary social science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2022

Daniel J. D'Amico  and
Adam G. Martin
Daniel J. D'Amico*
Affiliation:
The Political Theory Project, Brown University, Providence, USA
Adam G. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heterodox economic approaches such as Austrian economics and market process analysis rely upon a less formalistic approach to rationality than neoclassical frameworks. We argue such looser formalism provides a unique opportunity for interdisciplinary engagement to investigating and understanding social institutions, outcomes and complex phenomenon. This introduction briefly summarizes the contents of this invited issue as effective examples of such interdisciplinarity.

Keywords

Austrian economicsinterdisciplinarymarket process
Type
Symposium on Institutional Analysis, Market Processes, and Interdisciplinary Social Science
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 445 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, J. (1999), Cost and Choice: An Inquiry in Economic Theory, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J.-P. (2021), “Markets and Communities: The Social Cost of the Meritocracy”, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi: 10.1017/S174413742100045XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, G. S. and Storr, V. H. (2021), “The Market as A Procedure for the Discovery of Whom not to Trust”, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi: 10.1017/S1744137421000370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973), ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, The American Journal of Sociology, 78(60): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hantula, D. (2019), ‘Editorial: Replication and Reliability in Behavior Science and Behavior Analysis: A Call for A Conversation’, Perspectives on Behavior Science: 42. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00194-2Google Scholar
Kaminski, M. (2021), “Games Prisoners do not Play: Against the Hobbes-Zimbardo Approach of Unmitigated Prison Violence”, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi: 10.1017/S1744137421000114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leonard, T. (2017), Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D. and Peart, S. (2008), ‘Thinking About Analytical Egalitarianism’, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(3): 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, L. (1949 [2010]), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J. (forthcoming 2022), The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason, Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, M. (1998), ‘Psychology and Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1): 11–46.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776 [1904]), An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, V. (2003), ‘Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics’, American Economic Review, 93(3): 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, R. (1990), Economics and Sociology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, G. (2021), “Austrian Behavioral Economics”, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi: 10.1017/S1744137421000084CrossRefGoogle Scholar