Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:20:21.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Doctor, Doctor. . .’ entrepreneurial diagnosis and market making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

ANDREW C. GODLEY  and
MARK C. CASSON
ANDREW C. GODLEY*
Affiliation:
Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK
MARK C. CASSON*
Affiliation:
Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
**Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Doctor-patient jokes are universally popular because of the information asymmetries within the diagnostic relationship. We contend that entrepreneurial diagnosis is present in markets where consumers are unable to diagnose their own problems and, instead, rely on the entrepreneur to diagnose them. Although it is widely recognized that consumers face information asymmetries over price comparison and quality assessment, little attention has been given to information asymmetries regarding individual customers’ needs. This has led to the economic contribution of the diagnostic entrepreneur being overlooked. Entrepreneurial diagnosis is a cognitive skill possessed by the entrepreneur. It is a subset of entrepreneurial judgment and can be modeled. The model shows that in order to exploit opportunities it is often necessary for entrepreneurs to invest in market-making activities, such as customer-focused diagnostic services, backed up by credible reputations for competence and integrity. While diagnostic entrepreneurship is particularly important in knowledge-intensive service industries (such as medicine) it is important in all industries whenever radical product innovation occurs (e.g. modern computers and phones). Successful commercialization of innovation often requires, not only new technology, but diagnostic entrepreneurship too.

Type
A forum on the judgment-based approach to entrepreneurship
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 601 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. (1970), ‘The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3): 488–500.Google Scholar
Casson, M. C. (1982 [2003]), The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Casson, M. C. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm,’ Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 58: 327–348.Google Scholar
Casson, M. C. and Godley, A. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship and historical explanation,’ in Cassis, Y. and Pepelasis Minoglou, I. (eds.), Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Choi, Y., Levesque, M., and Shepherd, D. (2008), ‘When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation,’ Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (3): 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. (1997), ‘The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Davies, C. (2002), The Mirth of Nations. Transaction Publishers, Edisons NJ.Google Scholar
Dew, N., Sarasathy, S., Read, S., and Wiltbank, R., (2009), ‘Affordable loss: behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision,’ Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3 (2): 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimov, D. (2011), ‘Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35 (1): 57–81.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A. (2003), ‘Opportunities and entrepreneurship,’ Opportunities and entrepreneurship, 29 (3): 333–349.Google Scholar
Foss, N. and Klein, P. (2012) Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Gielnika, M., Freseb, M., Grafc, J. and Kampschulte, A. (2012), ‘Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information,’ Journal of Business Venturing, 27 (5): 559–576.Google Scholar
Godley, A. (2013), ‘Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Implicit Contracts and Market Making for Consumer Goods,’ Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7 (4): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ireland, R., Hitt, M., and Sirmon, D. (2003), ‘A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions,’ Journal of Management, 29 (6): 963–989.Google Scholar
Klein, B. and Leffler, K. (1981), ‘The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,’ Journal of Political Economy, 89 (4): 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S. and Galán González, J. (2012), ‘Enriching Strategic Variety in New Ventures Through External Knowledge,’ Journal of Business Venturing, 27 (4): 401–413.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (1998), Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Consumers. Second Edition. Chichester: Capstone-Wiley.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. J. (1974), ‘Advertising and Information,’ Journal of Political Economy, 81 (4): 729–745.Google Scholar
Orme, BK. (2006), Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC.Google Scholar
Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S., Song, M., and Wiltbank, R. (2009), ‘Marketing Under Uncertainty: The Logic of an Effectual Approach,’ Journal of Marketing, 73 (3): 1–18.Google Scholar
Sarasan, Y., Dean, T., and Dillard, J. (2006), ‘Entrepreneurship as the Nexus of Individual and Opportunity: A Structuration View,’ Journal of Business Venturing, 21 (3): 286–305.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., Read, S., and Wiltbank, R. (2011), ‘On the Entrepreneurial Genesis of New Markets: Effectual Transformations Versus Causal Search and Selection,’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21 (2): 231–253.Google Scholar
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., (2000), ‘The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research,’ Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 217–226.Google Scholar
Short, J., Ketchen, D., Shook, C., and Ireland, R., (2010), ‘The Concept of ‘Opportunity’ in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges,’ Journal of Management, 36 (1): 40–65.Google Scholar
Strasser, S. (2012), Snake Oil Revisited, Harvard University working paper.Google Scholar
Wicklund, J. and Shepherd, D., (2005), ‘Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach,’ Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (1): 71–91.Google Scholar
Wood, M. S. and McKinley, W. (2010), ‘The Production of Entrepreneurial Opportunity: A Constructivist Perspective,’ Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4 (1): 66–84.Google Scholar
Woolley, J. (2010), ‘Technology Emergence Through Entrepreneurship Across Multiple Industries,’ Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. and Wright, M. (2011), ‘Entrepreneurship's Next Act,’ Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (4): 67–83.Google Scholar