Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:31:42.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crafting of cognitive institutions for overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Daniil Frolov Open the ORCID record for Daniil Frolov [Opens in a new window]
Daniil Frolov*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Management, Volgograd State Technical University, Volgograd, Russia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pablo Paniagua and Veeshan Rayamajhee (2021) propose an Ostromian polycentric view on coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) preventative measures co-produced by the state and citizens. I argue that we should also use another Ostromian approach – ‘crafting of institutions.’ Focusing on the crafting of cognitive institutions allows us to understand the co-production of virus containment in all its complexity. Combining the ‘crafting cognitive institutions’ and ‘boosting’ approaches will allow for the creation of institutionally and behaviorally informed anti-COVID policy interventions in line with polycentric pandemic governance.

Keywords

Boostscognitive institutionsco-productionCOVID-19pandemic governancepolycentricity
Type
Comment
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 953 - 959
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, J. M. (2020), Anti-vaxxers: How to Challenge A Misinformed Movement, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2020), Action and Interaction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germani, F. and Biller-Andorno, N. (2021), ‘The Anti-Vaccination Infodemic on Social media: A Behavioral Analysis’, PLoS One, 16(3): e0247642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greif, A. and Mokyr, J. (2017), ‘Cognitive Rules, Institutions, and Economic Growth: Douglass North and Beyond’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne-Yanoff, T. and Hertwig, R. (2016), ‘Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?’, Minds and Machines, 26(1–2): 149–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertwig, R. and Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017), ‘Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6): 973–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornsey, M. J. and Fielding, K. S. (2017), ‘Attitude Roots and Jiu Jitsu Persuasion: Understanding and Overcoming the Motivated Rejection of Science’, American Psychologist, 72(5): 459–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krawiec, J. M., Piaskowska, O. M., Piesiewicz, P. F. and Białaszek, W. (2021), ‘Tools for Public Health Policy: Nudges and Boosts as Active Support of the law in Special Situations Such as the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Globalization and Health, 17(132): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciuszek, J., Polak, M., Stasiuk, K. and Doliński, D. (2021), ‘Active pro-Vaccine and Anti-Vaccine Groups: Their Group Identities and Attitudes Toward Science’, PLoS One, 16(12): e0261648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motta, M., Callaghan, T., Sylvester, S. and Lunz-Trujillo, K. (2021), ‘Identifying the Prevalence, Correlates, and Policy Consequences of Anti-Vaccine Social Identity’, Politics, Groups, and Identities, published online. doi:10.1080/21565503.2021.1932528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newen, A., De Bruin, L. and Gallagher, S. (2018), ‘4E Cognition: Historical Roots, Key Concepts, and Central Issues’ in Newen, A., De Bruin, L. and Gallagher, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1992), Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems, California: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paniagua, P. and Rayamajhee, V. (2021), ‘A Polycentric Approach for Pandemic Governance: Nested Externalities and Co-production challenges’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi:10.1017/S1744137421000795Google Scholar
Petracca, E. and Gallagher, S. (2020), ‘Economic Cognitive Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(6): 747–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayamajhee, V., Shrestha, S. and Paniagua, P. (2021), ‘Governing Nested Externalities During A Pandemic: Social Distancing as a Coproduction Problem’, Cosmos and Taxis, 9(5–6): 64–80.Google Scholar