Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:33:18.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in resistance to haemonchosis: selection of female sheep resistant to Haemonchus contortus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

V. Hooda
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, India
C.L. Yadav
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, India
S.S. Chaudhri*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, India
B.S. Rajpurohit
Affiliation:
Central Sheep Breeding Farm, Hisar 125004, India
*
Author for correspondence.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Seventy female lambs (6–7 months old) which were exposed to natural infections of Haemonchus contortus were designated as responders or non-responders on the basis of 10 weekly cumulative faecal egg counts. Selected responder and non-responder lambs were treated with ivermectin, housed separately and 6 weeks post-housing, seven lambs from each group were given a trickle infection of Haemonchus contortus at 1000 L3 daily for 5 days per week up to 2 weeks and examined weekly for 10 weeks after first infection. Analysis of data revealed significantly lower mean faecal egg counts and non-significantly less weight loss in responder than non-responder lambs. Mean values of haemoglobin, packed cell volume, total serum protein and peripheral eosinophil counts were significantly higher in responders than non-responders. In contrast, serum pepsinogen concentration was significantly less in responders than in non-responders. At 10 weeks post-infection, there were fewer pathological lesions and significantly lower worm burdens in responders than in non-responders. These results demonstrate a distinct resistance in responders to Haemonchus contortus infection.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

References

Albers, G.A.A., Gray, L.R., Piper, L.R., Baker, J.S.F., Le, Jambre, L.F. & Barger, I.A. (1987) The genetics of resistance and resilience to Haemonchus contortus infection in young merino sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 17, 13551363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon. (1986) Manual of veterinary parasitological techniques. pp. 550, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agriculture Development and Advisory Service. Technical Bulletin No. 18, London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Baker, R.L., Watson, T.G., Bisset, S.A., Vlassoff, A. & Douch, P.G.C. (1991) Breeding sheep in New Zealand for resistance to internal parasites: research results and commercial application. pp. 1922 in Gray, G.D. & Woolaston, R.R. (Eds) Breeding for disease resistance in sheep. Wool Research and Development Corporation, Parkville, Victoria.Google Scholar
Barger, I.A. & Dash, K.M. (1987) Repeatability of ovine faecal egg counts and blood packed cell volumes in Haemonchus contortus infections. International Journal for Parasitology 17, 977980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisset, S.A., Vlassoff, A. & West, C.J. (1991) Progress in selective breeding of sheep for increased natural resistance to infection with nematode parasites. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 18, 8586.Google Scholar
Buddle, B.M., Jowett, G., Green, R.S., Douch, P.G.C. & Risdon, P.L. (1992) Association of blood eosinophilia with expression of resistance in Romney lambs to nematodes. International Journal for Parasitology 22, 955960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabaret, J. & Gruner, L. (1988) Genetic variability of resistance to parasites. pp. 577592 in Third World Congress on sheep and beef cattle breeding, Paris. Vol. 1, INRA Paris Publication.Google Scholar
Coles, E.H. (1974) Veterinary clinical pathology. 2nd edn, pp. 5054, 6263, 106, 112–113, 567. Philadelphia, W.S. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
Cullings, C.F.A. (1963) Handbook of histopathological techniques 2nd edn, 553 pp. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Dawkins, H.J.S., Windson, R.G. & Eagleson, G.K. (1989) Eosinophil responses in sheep selected for high and low responsiveness to Trichostrongylus colubriformis. International Journal for Parasitology 19, 199205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, G.D. (1991) Breeding for resistance to trichostrongyle nematodes in sheep. pp. 139161 in Owen, J.B. & Axford, R.F.E. (Eds) Breeding for disease resistance in farm animals. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Gray, G.D., Woolaston, R.R. & Eaton, B.T. (1995) Breeding for resistance to infectious diseases in small ruminants. 322 pp. Canberra, Australia, ACIAR.Google Scholar
Gruner, L. (1991) Breeding for helminth resistance in sheep and goats. pp. 187200. in Owen, J.B. & Axford, R.F.E. (Eds) Breeding for disease resistance in farm animals. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Holmes, P.H. & Mclean, J.M. (1971) The pathophysiology of ovine ostertagiasis. A study of the changes in plasma metabolism following single infections. Research in Veterinary Science 12, 265271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D.G. (1993) The eosinophil. Journal of Comparative Pathology 108, 313335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowry, O.H., Rosenbroough, M.J., Farr, A.E. & Randall, R.J. (1951) Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luffau, G., Vu Tien Khang, J., Bouix, J., Nguyen, T.C., Cullen, P. & Ricordeau, G. (1990) Resistance to experimental infections with Haemonchus contortus in Romanov sheep. Genetic Selection and Evolution 2, 205299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylrea, P.J. & Hotson, I.K. (1969) Serum pepsinogen activity and diagnosis of bovine ostertagiasis. British Veterinary Journal 125, 379387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, D.M., Jackson, F., Huntley, J.F., Stevenson, L.M., Jones, D.G., Jackson, E. & Russel, A.J.F. (1996a) Studies on caprine responsiveness to nematodiasis: Segregation of male goats into responders and non-responders. International Journal of Parasitology 26, 187194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, D.M., Jackson, F., Huntley, J.F., Stevenson, L.M., Jones, D.G., Jackson, E. & Russel, A.J.F. (1996b) The response of breeding does to nematodiasis: segregation into responders and non-responders. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 195203.Google ScholarPubMed
Rahman, W.A. & Collins, G.H. (1990) Changes in live weight gain, blood constitutents and worm egg output in goats artificially infected with sheep derived strain of Haemonchus contortus. British Veterinary Journal 146, 543550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J.L. & Swan, R.A. (1981) Quantitative studies on ovine haemonchosis. 1. Relationship between faecal egg counts and total worm counts. Veterinary Parasitology 10, 165171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romjali, E., Pandey, V. S., Batubaraa, A., Gatneby, R.M. & Verhulst, A. (1996) Comparison of resistance of four genotypes of rams to experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus. Veterinary Parasitology 65, 127137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sewell, W.A. & Vadas, M.A. (1983) Evidence for the control of eosinophilia by the major histocompatibility complex in mice. Immunogenetics 17, 167177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S. & Yadav, C.L. (1997) A survey of anthelmintic resistance by nematodes on three sheep and two goat farms in Hisar (India). Veterinary Research Communications 21, 447451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, N.C. (1992) Concepts and strategies for anti-parasite immunoprophylaxis and therapy. International Journal for Parasitology 22, 10471082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G. (1968) Statistical methods. 593 pp. Calcutta, IBH Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sreter, T., Kassai, T. & Takacs, E. (1994) The heritability and specificity of responsiveness to infection with Haemonchus contortus among Scottish Blackface lambs. Veterinary Parasitology 24, 817876.Google Scholar
Thomas, R.J. & Walter, P.J. (1975) Significance of serum pepsinogen and abomasal pH levels in a field infection of Ostertagia circumcincta in lambs. Veterinary Record 97, 461471.Google Scholar
Vadas, M.A. (1982) Genetic control of eosinophilia in mice genes expressed in bone marrow derived cells control high responsiveness. Journal of Immunology 128, 591605.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1992) Genetic variation in resistance to parasitic infection. Experimental approaches and practical applications. Research in Veterinary Science 53, 139147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolaston, R.R., Windon, R.G. & Gray, G.D. (1991) Genetic variation in resistance to internal parasitism in Armidale experimental flocks. pp. 19 in Gray, G.D. & Woolaston, R.R. (Eds) Breeding for disease resistance in sheep. Wool Research and Development Corporation, Parkville, Victoria.Google Scholar
Yadav, C.L. (1990) Fenbedazole resistance in Haemonchus contortus. Veterinary Record 126, 586.Google Scholar
Yadav, C.L., Grewal, H.S. & Banerjee, D.P. (1993) Susceptibility of two cross breeds of sheep to Haemonchus contortus. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 819822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, C.L., Kumar, R., Uppal, R.P. & Verma, S.P. (1995) Multiple anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus on a sheep farm in India. Veterinary Parasitology 60, 355360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yadav, C.L., Singh, Z., Banerjee, D.P. & Chaturvedi, G.C. (1997) Breed differences in acquired resistance of sheep to Haemonchus contortus. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 67, 9599.Google Scholar
Zarrow, M.X., Yochim, J.M. & McCarthy, J.L. (1964) Experimental endocrinology. A source of basic techniques. pp. 166204, New York and London, Academic Press.Google Scholar