Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T05:44:16.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A. Technique for Counting Trematode Eggs in Sheep Faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

H. V. Whitlock
H. V. Whitlock
Affiliation:
McMaster Laboratory, Division of Animal Health and Production, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A technique is described for the floatation and enumeration of trematode eggs. A special sampling and mixing pipette has been designed. The floatation fluid is a solution of potassium mercuri-iodide (K2HgI4). A modified McMaster egg-count slide, or else a calibrated sliding toppiece apparatus is used for counting the eggs and estimating the number per gramme of faeces. The apparatus is illustrated and described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 24 , Issue 1-2 , August 1950 , pp. 47 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alicata, J. E., 1941.—“Studies on control of the liver fluke of cattle in the Hawaiian Islands”. Amer. J. vet. Res., 2, 152–164.Google Scholar
Bajcsy, E., 1943.—“Can the degree of liver fluke infestation be estimated by an enrichment test count of eggs in faeces ?” Abstract in Vet. Bull. (1945), 15, 284.Google Scholar
Barody, B. J., 1948.—“Fecal examination methods in schistosomiasis japonica”. Lab. Digest, 11,8–11.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, H., 1937.—Vergleichende Untersuchungen verschiedener Flotationsmedien rum Nachweis von Leberegeleiern im Kot von Schaf und Rind. Dissertation, Hannover. Abstract in Helminth. Abstr., 6, 160.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. and Whitlock, H. V., 1939.—“A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces”. J. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust., 12, 50–52. (W.L. 11140a).Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W., Hodges, E. P., Jahnes, W. G., Diamond, L. S. and Ingalls, J. W., Jr., 1948.—“Studies on schistosomiasis. II. Summary of further studies on methods of recovering eggs of Schistosoma japonicum from stools”. U.S. Army Med. Dept. Bull., 8, 128–131.Google Scholar
Janecsko, A. and Urbanek, L., 1931.—“Enrichment method for finding liver-fluke eggs”. Allatorv. Lapok, 54, 247–248. (W.L. 401).Google Scholar
Kauzaj, G. P. and Gordon, H. MCL., 1941.—“A useful mixing apparatus for the preparation of suspensions of faeces for helminthological examinations”. J. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust., 14, 304–305. (W.L. 11140a).Google Scholar
Kotlan, A. and Vajda, T 1941.—“The concentration of liver-fluke eggs and the diagnosis of liver-fluke disease”. Allatorv. Lapok, 64, 19. (W.L. 401.)Google Scholar
Lehrke, K 1941.—“Vergleichende Untersuchungen mit verschiedenen Flota-tionsmedien zur Wurmdiagnose bei unseren Haus- und Nutztieren Inaug. diss”. Abstract in Vet. Bull. (1943), 13, 113.Google Scholar
Nöller, W. and Schmid, F., 1927.—“Die Wasserglas-Zentrifugier-Schwimm Methode nach Vajda, 1927, in ihrem Werte für parasitologisch Untersuchungen”. Tierarztl. Rdsch., 33, 759–765. (W.L. 21249.)Google Scholar
Olsen, O. W., 1946.—“Hexachlorethane-bentonite suspension for the removal of the common liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, from sheep”. Amer. J. vet. Res., 7, 358–364.Google ScholarPubMed
Rrvas, Damaso De, 1928.—“An efficient and rapid method of concentration for the detection of ova and cysts of intestinal parasites”. Amer. J. trop. Med., 8, 63–72. (W.L. 626.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1930.—“On methods of counting nematode ova in sheep dung”. Parasit., 22, 116–136. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szbpeshelyt, A. and Urbanyi, L., 1934.—“Anreicherungsmethode zum Nachweis der Distomeneier”. Münch, tierärztl. Wschr., 85, 293–295. (W.L. 14676.)Google Scholar
Thienel, M., 1925.—“Neue erfolgreiche Versuche zur Bekämpfung der Leber-egelseuche”. Münch, tierärztl. Wschr., 76, 621–632. (W.L. 14676.) Cited by Nöller and Schmid (1927).Google Scholar
Vajda, T., 1927.—“ Mételypeték kimutása bésárbol dusito eljárassa”. Allatorv. Közlem, 24, 23–25. (W.L. 402.) Cited by Nöller and Schmid (1927).Google Scholar
Van Someren, V. D., 1947.—“Sedimentation method for the detection and counting of Fasciola eggs in faeces”. J. comp. Path., 57, 240–244. (W.L. 11136.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitlock, H. V., y.—“New apparatus for counting small numbers of nematode eggs in faeces”. J. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust., 14, 306–507. (W.L. 11140a.)Google Scholar