Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:33:55.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Survial of Free Larvae of Heterodera shachtii in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Mary T. Franklin
Mary T. Franklin
Affiliation:
Attached to the Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, St. Albans, by the Agricultural Research Council.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is a well known fact that Heterodera schachtii in the brown cyst stage can survive in soil for several years in the absence of host plants. Fuchs found living contents in five-year old cysts of the beet strain of this nematode, while eight-year old cysts of the potato strain have been found by the writer still to be infective to the host plant. Thus, the starving out of this parasite by withholding susceptible crops would appear to be impracticable.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1937 , pp. 69 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fuchs, O., 1911.—“Beitrāge zur Biologieder Rübennematoden Heterodera schachlii.” Z. Landw. Vchsw. Öst., Jahrg. 14 pp. 923–949. (W. L. 23488.)Google Scholar
Goffart, H., 1931.—“Über die Kunstliche Reizbeeinflussung des Rubennematoden (Heterodera schachtii).” Fortschr. Landw. vi (18) 579. (W.L. 8643a.)Google Scholar
Marcinowski, K., 1909.—“Parasitisch und semiparasitisch Pflanzen lebende Nematoden.” Arb. Kaiser. Anstl. Land.-u. Forstw., VII (1).Google Scholar
Molz, F., 1930.—“ÜUber die Bekāmpfung des Rübennematoden (Heterodera schachtii) mit reizphysiologisch wirkenden Stoffen." Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 2, LXXXI (7) 92–103. (W.L. 23684).Google Scholar
Molz, F. 1932.—“Die Bekümpfung des RUbennematoden mittels des Chlorkalk-Aktivierungsverfahrens.” Dtsch. landw. Pr., LIX (30), 371–373. (W.L. 7262).Google Scholar
Nebel, B., 1926.—– Ein Beitrag zur Physiologie des Rübennematoden Heterodera schachtii vom Standpunkt der Bekāmpfung.” Kühn-Archiv., xii, 38–103. (W.L. 11941).Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. G. and Prentice, E. G., 1931.—“A Nematode Disease of Potatoes caused by Heterodera schachtii (Schmidt).” Research Bull. West of Scotland Agric. Coll., No. 2.Google Scholar
Rademacher, B., 1930.—“Reizphysfologie Beobachtungen an dem Rübennematoden Heterodera schachtii Schmidt.” Wiss. Arch. Landw., Abt. A, iii (5), 750–787.Google Scholar
Reinmuth, E., 1929.–“Der Kartoffelnematode.” Z. PflKrankh. (7), 1–37. (W.L. 23540a.)Google Scholar
Smedley, E. M., 1936.—“The Action of Certain Halogen Compounds on the Potato Eelworm, Heterodera schachtii.” J. Helminth., xiv (1), 11–20. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1931.—“On the Occurrence of Heterodera radicicola associated with Heterodera schachtii as a Field Parasite in Britain.” J. Helminth., ix (4), 205—208. (W.L. 11224b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1934.—“Experiments with the Root Excretions of Grasses as a possible means of eliminating Heterodera schachtii from infected soil.” J. Helminth., xii (1), 1–12. (W.L. 11224b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar