Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T00:37:42.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Three New Genera and some Little-Known Species of the Nematode Family Protostrongylidæ Leiper, 1926

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Thomas W. M. Cameron
Thomas W. M. Cameron
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The classification of the nematodes occurring in the lungs (and related forms) of land mammals has always been one of considerable difficulty, in large part because of the existing very inadequate descriptions of many of the commoner forms. Most systematic helminthologists have followed and amplified the classification adopted by Railliet and Henry in 1907, a system which divided these nematodes into three main groups — those found in the blood-stream (Hæmostrongylus); those found in the larger bronchi (Dictyocaulus, Metastrongylus and Crenosoma); and those found in the minute bronchi and alveoli (Synthetocaulus). While the first two groups contain four well-defined zoological species, an examination of the forms included in the genus Synthetocaulus shews that it consists of a heterogeneous collection of species, which, although possessing a common habitat, are by no means so closely related as has been supposed, and, indeed, belong to several different genera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1927 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hall., M.C.—1916.—“Ncmatode Parasites of Mammals …,” Proc. U.S. Nat' Mus., L. 1 to 258.Google Scholar
Hall., M.C., 1921.—“Two New Genera of Nematodes, with a note on a neglected Nematode Structure,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., LIX, 541 to 546.Google Scholar
Kamensky., S.M., 1905.—“The Systematic Position of the Genera Metastrongylus Wost. and Protostrongylus gen. among the other Strongylidæ,” Sborn. Trood. Charkov. Vet. Instil., 1905.Google Scholar
Lei Per, R. T., 1926.—“On the Roundworm Genera Protostrongylus and Angiostrongylus of Kamensky, 1905,” Jl. Helm., IV, 230 to 207.Google Scholar
Mueller, A., 1899.—“Die Nematoden der Sãugethierlungen und die Lungenwurmkrankheit,» Deut. Ztschr. f. Thier., XV, 261 to 321.Google Scholar
Mueller, A., 1891.—“Helminthologische Mitteilungen,» Deut. Ztschr. f. Thier., XVI, 58 to 70.Google Scholar
Neveu, Lemaire, 1918.—“Contribution à l'étude des organes reproductcurs et …,” Mem. Soc. Zool. de France, XXVII, 55 to 126.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1895.—Traité de Zoologie méd. et agric, pp. 427 to 439.Google Scholar
Raiillet, A., and Henry, A.—1907.—“Sur les Variations des Strongyles de l'ppareil respiratoire des Mammifères,” Compt.-rend. Soc. Biol., LXIII,; 751 to 753.Google Scholar
Vevers, G.M., 1922.—“On the Parasitic Ncmatodes collected from Mammalian Hosts …” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1922, pp. 901–919.Google Scholar