Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:13:32.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Life History of Echinostoma ivaniosi n. sp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

A. Mohandas
A. Mohandas
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Mar Ivanios College, Trivandrum-695015. Kerala, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The life cycle of Echinostoma ivaniosi n.sp., found in the rectum of domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) has been worked out in detail. The eggs hatch in 7–8 days in tap water at room temperature (24-28°C). Body of the miracidium covered with 18 epidermal plates arranged in four tiers of 6, 6, 4, 2 from the anterior to the posterior end. Miracidia develop into sporocysts in the snails, Lymnaea luteola f typica. There are two redial generations and the first cercariae are liberated 25–30 days post-infection with miracidia, or a little later. 37 collar spines of the cercaria are arranged in the pattern-5(3+2)+6+15(8+7)+6+5(3+2). Caudal finfold present, cuticle spinose, paraoesophageal gland cells present, penetration glands two pairs and excretory system with 18 pairs of flame cells in triplets. Metacercaria develops into adult in domestic fowl and the eggs are recovered from the faeces of the host, 12–14 days post-infection. The adult is compared with other 37-spined echinostomes whose life cycles are known or which show characteristic differences from the present species and the creation of a new species is justified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 1973 , pp. 421 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arora, S.Agarwal, M. M. and Agarwal, S. M., 1962.—“Studies on some intraspecific variations in Paradistomum orientalis Narain and Das, collected from the liver and intestine of Calotes versicolor Daud, Part II. (Dicro-coelidae- Trematoda).” Indian J. Helminlh., 14, 5–15.Google Scholar
Beaver, P. C., 1937.—“Experimental studies on Echinostoma revolution (Froel,), a fluke from birds and mammals.” Illinois Biol. Monogr., 15, 1–96.Google Scholar
Berrie, A. D., 1960.—“The influence of various definitive hosts on the development of Diplostomum phoxini (Faust) (Strigeida, Trematoda).” J: Helminch., 34, 205–210.Google Scholar
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovaskaya, I. E., 1962.—“Trematody ptitis fauny SSSR.” Moscow-Leningrad.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. and Wilson, R. A., 1970.—“The distribution and fine structure of the integumentary papillae of the cercaria of Hunasthla secunda (Nicoll).” Parasitology, 61, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ching, H. L., 1961.—“The development and morphological variation of Phil ophlhalmus gralli Mathis and Leger, 1910 with a comparison of species of Philophthalmus Looss, 1899.” Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash., 28, 130–138.Google Scholar
Dixon, K. E. and Mercer, E. H., 1965.—“The fine structure of the nervous system of the cercaria of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L.” J. Parasit., 51, 967–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, K. C.Lie, K. J. and Basch, P. F., 1968.—“The life history of Echinostonma rodriguesi sp.n. (Trematoda-Echinostomatidae).” J. Parasit., 54, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, M. and Tamura, O., 1933.—“Some intestinal parasites in duck from Japan.” Annol. Zool. Jap., 14, 1–6Google Scholar
Jain, G. P., 1960.—“On the genus Arlyfechinostomum (Lane, 1915) (Echinostoma-Trematoda).” Parasitology, 50, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeyarasasingam, U., Heyneman, D., Lit, Hok-Kan and Mansowi, Noshy., 1972.—“Life cycle of a new echinostome from Egypt, Echinostoma liei sp. nov. (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae).” Parasitology, 65, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. C., 1920.—“The life cycle of Echinostoma revolution (Frael, 1802).” Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 19, 335–389.Google Scholar
Kuan, D., 1960.—“Studies on larval tremetodes infecting fresh water snails in London and some adjoining areas. Part I. Echinostome cercariae.” J. Helminth., 34, 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuan, D., 1961.—“On the life history of Echinostoma londonennsis, the adult of Cercaria londonensis, Khan, 1960.” J. Helminth, 35, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, K. J., 1963.—“Studies on Echinostomidac in Malaya. III. The adult Echinostoma, malayanum Leiper, 1911 (Trematoda) and probable synonymy of Artyfechinostmum sufrartyfex Lane, 1915.” Zeil. Parasitenkde, 23, 124–135.Google Scholar
Lie, K. J., 1964.—“Studies on Echinostomidae in Malaya. VII. The life history of Echinostoma lindoense Sandground and Bonne, 1950.” Trop. Geogr. Med., 16, 72–81.Google Scholar
Lie, K. J., 1965.—“Studies on Echinostomidae (Trematoda) in Malaya. IX. The Mfehlis’Gland complex in echinostomes“. J. Parasit., 51, 789–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, K. J. and Bnscu, P. F., 1966.—“Life history of Echinosloma barbosai sp. n. J. Parasit., 52, 1053–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lie, K. J. and Basch, P. F.,1967.—“The life history of Echinostoma paraensei sp. n. (Trematoda-Echinostomatidae).” J. Parasit., 53, 1192–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, K. J., AND Umathevy, T., 1965.—“Studies on Echinostomatidae in Malaya. VIII. The life history of Echinostoma audyi sp.n.” J. Parasit. 51, 781–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. E., 1933.—“The miracidium of Heronimus chelydrae MacCallum.” Qrt. J. Micros. Sci., 76, 13–34.Google Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1929.—“Notes on Cercariae from Missouri“. J. Parasit., 15, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohandas, A., 1971.—“Integumentary. papillae and their taxonomic importance in cercariae.” Zeit ParasitenKde, 35, 334–339.Google Scholar
Mohandas, A.—“Contributions to the cercarial fauna of Kerala.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Kerala, 1971.Google Scholar
Najarain, H. H., 1954.—“Developmental stages in the life cycle of Echinoparyphium flexum (Linton, 1892) Dietz, 1910. (Trematoda-Echinostomidae)“. J. Morph., 94, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najarain, H. H., 1961.—“The identity of Echinoparyphium flexuum (Linton, 1892) Dietz, 1910. (Trematoda-Echinostomidae).” J. Parasit., 47, 635–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, P., 1960.—“Studies on the life history of Echinostoma nudicauudatum n.sp. (Echinostomidae-Trematoda).” J. Parasit., 46, 833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, P., 1961.—“observations on the life cycle of Echinosloma pinnicaudalum n.sp. (Echinostomatidae-Trematoda).” Proc. Helm inlh. Soc. Wash., 28, 207–212.Google Scholar
Nasir, P., 1962.—“Further observations on the life cycle of Echinostomna nudicadautum Nasir, 1960 (Echinostomatidae-Trematoda).” Proc. Helm inlh. Soc. Wash., 29, 115–127.Google Scholar
Odening, K., 1964.—“What is Cercaria spinifera La Valette? Some remarks on the species identity and biology of some echinostome cercariac.” Symposium on Helminths bound to aquatic conditions.Praha. 91–97.Google Scholar
Patnaik, M. M. and Ray, S. K., 1966.—“On the life history and distribution of Echinosloma revolutum (Froelich, 1802) in Orissa.” Indian Vet. J., 43, 591–600.Google Scholar
Rao, K. H., 1963.—“The structure of Miehli's gland complex and histochemistry of Artyfechinostomum, nehrai (Faruqui) (Trematoda-Echinostomatidae) from a girl in Andhra Pradesh, India.” Parasitology., 53, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhode, K., 1966.—“Sense receptors of Miulticotyle purvisi Dawes, 1941 (Trematoda-Aspidobothria).” Nature, 211, 820–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhode, K., 1968.—“Lichtmikroskopische Untersuchungen an der Sinnesreezeptoren der Trematoden.” Zeil. Parasilenkde, 30, 252–277.Google Scholar
Sundaram, R. K., 1968.—“A new sequence staining method for Echinostome collar spines.” Indian Vet. J., 45, 319–322.Google Scholar
Sufferer, R., 1959.—“Untersuchungen tiber Parasiten der Hausente, Anas platyrhynchos dom.” Zeit. Parasitenkde., 19, 259–277.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., 1966.—“The physiology of trematodes.” Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Tubangui, M. A., 1932.—“Observations on the life history of Euparyphium murinum Tubangui, 1931 and Echinosloma revolutum Froel. 1802 (Trematoda).” Philipp. J. Sci., 47, 497–513.Google Scholar
Willmott, S., 1952.—“The development and morphology of the miracidium of ParaMphistomum hiberniae Willmott, 1950.” J. Helminth., 26, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, D. C., 1959.—“Further observations on Artyfechinostomum sufrartyfex (Lane) Bhalerao, 1931 (Trematoda-Echinostomidae) with a note on its systematic position.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 29, 157–167.Google Scholar