Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:14:51.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Epizootiology of Neoascaris vitulorum in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Ulo K. Enyenihi
Ulo K. Enyenihi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinciry MedicineUniversity of Ibadan, Ibadam, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The effect of relative humidity on the survival and development of Neoascaris vitulorum eggs to the infective stage is described.

2. Tables showing the percentages of eggs at different stages of development and dead eggs at weekly interval for two different sizes of faecal masses are constructed and the results discussed.

3. Detailed weather graphs showing daily rainfall, average daily relative humidity and evapotranspiration for Ibadan and Obudu during the rainy season of 1964 are constructed and the effect of the weather on survival of Neoascans vitulorum eggs in pasture at these places is discussed.

4. The minimum relative humidity for the survival and development of Neoascaris vitulorum eggs to the infective stage is found to be 80%. The period of survival of eggs in a dry atmosphere depends on the size of the faecal mass containing the eggs. The critical relative humidity for Neoascaris vitulorum eggs is compared with values for other ascarids of domestic animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 43 , Issue 1-2 , March 1969 , pp. 3 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buxton, P. A., 1931.—“The measurement and Control of atmospheric humidity in relation to entomological problems.” Bull. ent. Res., 22, 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. and Mellanby, K., 1934.—“The measurement and control of humidity.” Bull. ent. Res., 25, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyenihi, U. K., 1966.—Ph.D. Thesis, Ibadan University.Google Scholar
McRae, A., 1935.—“A study of the moisture requirements of the eggs of the chicken ascarid; Ascaridia galli.” J. Parasit., 21, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onorato, A. R., 1932.—“The effects of temperature and humidity on the ova of Toxocara canis and Trichuris vulpis.” Am. J. Hyg., 16, 266–287.Google Scholar
Refuerzo, P. G. and Albis-Jiminez, F., 1954.—“Studies on Neoascaris vitulorum. ii: The resistance of the ova to certain chemical agents and physical factors under tropical conditions.” Am. J. vet. Res., 15, 440–443.Google ScholarPubMed
Refuerzo, P. G. and Albis-Jiminez, F., and Cerna, De La G., 1952.—“Studies on Neoascaris vitulorum (Goeze, 1782). (i): Observations on the morphology of ova and on their development to the infective stage, with notes on feeding experiments.” Philipp. J. Anim. Ind., 13, 15–23.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., 1922.—“Observations on the life history of Ascaris vitulorum, a parasite of bovines in the Philippine Islands. Preliminary papers.” Philipp. J. Sci., 20, 663–669.Google Scholar
Spindler, L. A., 1940.—“Effect of tropical sunlight on eggs of Ascaris suis (Nematoda) the large intestinal roundworm of swine.” J. Parasit., 26, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar