Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:07:34.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stock discrimination of Chelidonichthys obscurus (Triglidae) in the central Mediterranean Sea using morphometric analysis and parasite markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

L. Boudaya*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Écosystèmes Aquatiques, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia
M. Feki
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Écosystèmes Aquatiques, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia
N. Mosbahi
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Écosystèmes Aquatiques, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia
L. Neifar
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Écosystèmes Aquatiques, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia
*
Author for correspondence: L. Boudaya, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Assessing fish stocks has important implications for fisheries management and conservation biology. Gurnards are marine demersal fish that commonly occur in the Mediterranean, but their population in this region remains to be quantified. This study examines the population structure of the longfin gurnard Chelidonichthys obscurus (Walbaum, 1792) in waters off eastern Tunisia, using morphometry and parasite assemblages. A total of 134 fish are investigated from two studied zones – the Gulf of Hammamet and the Gulf of Gabès. Discriminant analysis is used to compare gurnard populations in the two studied zones using 13 morphometric characters and the infection parameters of seven parasites. Morphometric analysis reveals strong spatial variations between the studied zones, providing evidence for the existence of an ecological differentiation along the eastern Tunisian coast. Mahalanobis distances show that body height, pectoral fin length and first dorsal fin length are the most salient morphometric characters for determining the position of samples from the Gulf of Gabès. The effectiveness of using parasites to study longfin gurnard stocks is uncertain. The use of short-lived parasites as biological tags is questionable, at least in the present case. Future research, based on complementary approaches such as otolith microchemistry and genetics, may improve our understanding of the global stock structure of longfin gurnard to suitably inform regional organizations involved in fisheries management.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afzal Khan, M and Nazir, A (2019) Stock delineation of the long-whiskered catfish, Sperata aor (Hamilton 1822), from River Ganga by using morphometrics. Marine and Freshwater Research 70, 107113.Google Scholar
Begg, GA, Friedland, KD and Pearce, JB (1999) Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fisheries Research 43, 18.Google Scholar
Boudaya, L, Neifar, L, Taktak, A, Ghorbel, M and Bouain, A (2007) Diet of Chelidonichthys obscurus and Chelidonichthys lastoviza (Pisces: Triglidae) from the Gulf of Gabès (Tunisia). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23, 646653.Google Scholar
Bovet, J (1967) Contribution à la morphologie et la biologie de Diplozoon paradoxum V. Nordmann, 1832. Bulletin de la Société neuchâteloise des sciences naturelles 90, 63159.Google Scholar
Brodgar (2000) Software package for multivariate analysis and multivariate time series analysis. Aberdeen, Highland Statistics Ltd.Google Scholar
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM and Shostak, AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.Google Scholar
Bykhowskii, BE (1957) Monogenetic trematodes their system and phylogeny. Moskwa, Russian, Izd. Akadem. Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Cadrin, SX, Friedland, KD and Waldman, JR (2005) Stock identification methods. Applications in fishery science. London, Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cadrin, SX, Kerr, LA and Mariani, S (2014) Interdisciplinary evaluation of spatial population structure for definition of fishery management units. pp. 109128 in Cadrin, SX, Kerr, LA and Mariani, S (Eds) Stock identification methods. San Diego, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cantatore, DMP and Timi, JT (2015) Marine parasites as biological tags in South American Atlantic waters, current status and perspectives. Parasitology 142, 524.Google Scholar
Catalano, SR, Whittington, ID, Donnellan, SC and Gillanders, BM (2014) Parasites as biological tags to assess host population structure: guidelines, recent genetic advances and comments on a holistic approach. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 3, 220226.Google Scholar
Colloca, F, Ardizzone, GD and Gravina, MF (1994) Trophic ecology of gurnards (Pisces: Triglidae) in the Central Mediterranean Sea. Fisheries Research 32, 2132.Google Scholar
Costa, C and Cataudella, S (2007) Relationship between shape and trophic ecology of selected species of Sparids of the Caprolace coastal lagoon (Central Tyrrhenian Sea). Environmental Biology of Fishes 78, 115123.Google Scholar
Cribb, TH and Bray, RA (2010) Gut wash, body soak, blender, and heat fixation: approaches to the effective collection, fixation and preservation of trematodes of fishes. Systematic Parasitology 76, 17.Google Scholar
Cribb, TH, Chisholm, LA and Bray, AR (2002) Diversity in the Monogenea and Digenea: does lifestyle matter? International Journal for Parasitology 32, 321328.Google Scholar
Elliott, NG, Haskard, K and Koslow, JA (1995) Morphometric analysis of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atianticus) off the continental slope of Southern Australia. Journal of Fish Biology 46, 202220.Google Scholar
Favaloro, E and Mazzola, A (2006) Meristic character counts and incidence of skeletal anomalies in the wild Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti, 1777) of an area of the south-eastern Mediterranean. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 32, 159166.Google Scholar
Fisheries and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2007) The state of the world fisheries. Rome, FAO. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0699e.Google Scholar
Fisheries and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, Contributing to food security and nutrition for all.Google Scholar
Geladakis, G, Nikolioudakis, N, Koumoundouros, G and Somarakis, S (2017) Morphometric discrimination of pelagic fish stocks challenged by variation in body condition. ICES Journal of Marine Science 75, 711718.Google Scholar
Hyslop, EJ (1980) Stomach contents analysis – a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 411429.Google Scholar
Izzo, C, Ward, TM, Ivey, AR, Suthers, IM, Stewart, J, et al. (2017) Integrated approach to determining stock structure: implications for fisheries management of sardine, Sardinops sagax, in Australian waters. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 27, 267284.Google Scholar
Kritzer, JP and Liu, OR (2014) Fishery management strategies for addressing complex spatial structure in marine fish stocks identification methods. pp. 2957 in Cadrin, SX, Kerr, LA and Mariani, S (Eds) Stock identification methods. San Diego, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lackenby, JA, Chambers, CB, Ernst, I and Whittington, ID (2007) Effect of water temperature on reproductive development of Benedenia seriolae (Monogenea: Capsalidae) from Seriola lalandi in Australia. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 74, 235242.Google Scholar
Lester, RJG and MacKenzie, K (2009) The use and abuse of parasites as stock markers for fish. Fisheries Research 97, 12.Google Scholar
Lleonart, J and Maynou, F (2003) Fish stock assessments in the Mediterranean: State of the art. Scientia Marina 67, 3749.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K and Abaunza, P (1998) Parasites as biological tags for stock discrimination of marine fish: a guide to procedures and methods. Fisheries Research 38, 4556.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K and Abaunza, P (2013) Parasites as biological tags. pp. 185204 in Cadrin, SX, Kerr, LA, Mariani, S (Eds) Stock identification methods, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K and Hemmingsen, W (2015) Parasites as biological tags in marine fisheries research: European Atlantic waters. Parasitology 142, 5467.Google Scholar
Marcil, J, Swain, DP and Hutchings, JA (2006) Countergradient variation in body shape between two populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Proceedings, Biological Sciences 273, 217223.Google Scholar
Marcogliese, DJ and Jacobson, KC (2015) Parasites as biological tags of marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes in North America from the tropics to the Arctic. Parasitology 142, 6889.Google Scholar
Murta, AG, Pinto, AL and Abaunza, P (2008) Stock identification of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) through the analysis of body shape. Fisheries Research 89, 152158.Google Scholar
Nunoo, F, Russell, B, Bannermann, P and Poss, S (2015) Chelidonichthys obscurus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: e.T198753A15597479. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.IK.2015-4.RLTS.T198753A15597479.en (accessed 31 May 2018).Google Scholar
Pauly, D, Hilborn, R and Branch, TA (2013) Does catch reflect abundance? Nature 494, 303306.Google Scholar
Pilling, GM, Apostolaki, P, Failler, P, Floros, C, Large, PA, et al. (2008) Assessment and management of data-poor fisheries. pp. 280305 in Payne, A, Cotter, J and Potter, T (Eds) Advances in fisheries science, 50 years after Beverton and Holt. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Poulin, R (2004) Macroecological patterns of species richness in parasite assemblages. Basic and Applied Ecology 5, 423434.Google Scholar
Richards, WJ and Jones, DL (2002) Preliminary classification of the gurnards (Triglidae: Scorpaeniformes). Marine and Freshwater Research 53, 275282.Google Scholar
Sammari, C, Koutitonsky, VG and Moussa, M (2006) Sea level variability and tidal resonance in the Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia. Continental Shelf Research 26, 338350.Google Scholar
Sanches, F, Blanco, M and Gancedo, R (2002) Atlas de los peces demersales y do los invertebrados de interés commercial de Galicia y el Cantábrico, Otoño 1997–1999. Madrid, Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia.Google Scholar
Swain, DP and Holtby, LB (1989) Differences in morphology and behavior between juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch) rearing in a lake and in its tributary stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46, 14061414.Google Scholar
Tsikliras, AC, Dinouli, A and Tsalkou, E (2013) Exploitation trends of the Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries. Acta Adriatica 54, 273282.Google Scholar
Tubbs, LA, Poortenaar, CW, Sewell, MA and Diggles, BK (2005) Effects of temperature on fecundity in vitro, egg hatching and reproductive development of Benedenia seriolae and Zeuxapta seriolae (Monogenea) parasitic on yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 315327.Google Scholar
Turan, C, Ergüden, D and Gürlek, M (2016) Critically endangered fish species of Turkish Seas (Mediterranean and Aegean): longfin gurnard, Chelidonichthys obscurus (Walbaum, 1792). Natural and Engineering Sciences 1, 1115.Google Scholar
Vasilakopoulos, P, Maravelias, CD and Tserpes, G (2014) The alarming decline of Mediterranean fish stocks. Current Biology 24, 16431648.Google Scholar
Weston, LF, Reed, CC, Hendricks, M, Winker, H and Van Der Lingen, CD (2015) Stock discrimination of South African sardine (Sardinops sagax) using a digenean parasite biological tag. Fisheries Research 164, 120129.Google Scholar
Zar, JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar