Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:52:25.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small islands as potential model ecosystems for parasitology: climatic influence on parasites of feral cats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2022

David Marbella
Affiliation:
Anicura Albea, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
Kevin Manuel Santana-Hernández*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Las Palmas, Spain
Eligia Rodríguez-Ponce
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Las Palmas, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Kevin Manuel Santana Hernández, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of climate on parasite distribution has been demonstrated in different regions worldwide. Despite its small size, Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain) constitutes a ‘biodiversity laboratory’ due to the huge climatic differences between municipalities. Feral cats may represent a threat to biodiversity due to their predatory behaviour. In addition, they may be a source of pathogens zoonotic to humans. To study the climatic/seasonal influence and prevalence of feral cat parasites throughout the island, a total of 290 stool samples from 29 feral cat colonies were analysed following standard concentration protocols (sodium chloride, formol-ether and zinc sulphate). In total, 13 feline parasitic taxa were found, with the most common species being Ancylostoma spp., which, together with Toxocara spp., Toxoplasma gondii and Giardia spp., are considered a concern for human health. Nematodes were the most common parasites in all areas. Nematodes and protozoans were significantly more prevalent in temperate mild (75.0% and 30.0%) than in dry desert areas (29.3% and 18.7%). In contrast, cestodes were significantly more prevalent in dry desert than in temperate mild areas (26.0% and 13.3%). Only protozoans exhibited statistically significant seasonal patterns, mostly in the wet season. Data reported in this study endorse the usage of small and diverse islands such as Gran Canaria to study the climatic influence on parasitic communities in wild/feral animals. Cat colonies require better management to reduce their threat to endemic wildlife, domestic animals and public health, being invasive species that harbour zoonotic parasites.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Seasonal and climatic variations have an important influence on vertebrate parasitic diseases worldwide (Elmaleck, Reference Elmaleck2015; Rondón et al., Reference Rondón, Ortiz, León, Galvis, Link and González2017; Short et al., Reference Short, Caminade and Thomas2017), including those affecting domestic carnivores like cats (Okoye et al., Reference Okoye, Obiezue, Okoh and Amadi2013; Beugnet et al., Reference Beugnet, Bourdeau and Chalvet-Monfray2014). This climatic influence enables the transmission and maintenance of parasitic species in certain places or even restricts their spread to other regions in the same country (i.e. schistosomiasis in China), as clearly demonstrated in large continental areas, even between neighbouring countries (Martens, Reference Martens1999; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yang and Yang2008). Marked climatic differences are not only present in large countries, but they can also be found in islands such as Gran Canaria, in Spanish Macaronesia.

Located off the north-western coast of Africa, Gran Canaria is described as a ‘miniature continent’ due to its 20–21°C temperature at sea level and less than 12°C in highland areas all year round, and a striking difference between the rainy municipalities in the centre-north and very dry ones in the south. Therefore, islands like Gran Canaria could serve as low-scale model ecosystems for parasite epidemiology among different communities of animal species. These different conditions between municipalities may also influence the distribution of vertebrate parasites present in different parts of the island, which include those found in feral cat communities, some of which have zoonotic potential.

Spillover and the emergence of zoonotic disease outbreaks potentially occur when the human–wildlife interface becomes narrower, facilitating the contamination of domestic and peridomestic areas (Mackenstedt et al., Reference Mackenstedt, Jenkins and Romig2015). In this sense, feral cats clearly act as reservoirs for zoonotic parasites, posing not only a hazard to humans by cohabiting with suburban colonies, but also infecting domestic animals (Morand et al., Reference Morand, McIntyre and Baylis2014).

Feral cats were introduced to Gran Canaria during the Spanish colonization of the island in the 14th century (Medina & Nogales, Reference Medina and Nogales2009), resulting in the establishment of several colonies and their spread to all municipalities of the island. On this island, especially in suburban and rural areas, it is rather common to allow domestic cats to freely enter and leave houses, making them prone to infection from local feral cats through direct or indirect contact. Furthermore, indirect contact implies the consumption of prey with infective stages of parasites, which could later result in an indoor source of zoonotic parasite infection (Morand et al., Reference Morand, McIntyre and Baylis2014).

A neutering–releasing protocol is currently implemented to control these populations. The main objectives are to reduce the number of feral cats and their impact on endemic species, and prevent the public health risks (Rodríguez-Ponce et al., Reference Rodríguez-Ponce, González, Conde de Felipe, Hernandez and Jaber2016).

This study aims to deepen the epidemiology of feral cat parasites on Gran Canaria and investigate the influence of climatic conditions on their distribution, highlighting those with zoonotic potential. This research provides relevant information for use in cat colony control programmes.

Material and methods

Sampling and processing

Stool samples of randomly selected feral cats were analysed between January 2017 and May 2018. The cats lived in 29 colonies distributed throughout the island's 21 municipalities (fig. 1). The samples consisted of mixed faeces from at least three random cats, freshly deposited on soil. One sample was taken monthly from each municipality, except for Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, the island's capital, where four samples were taken, as this city has the largest number of inhabitants. In the municipalities with more than 30,000 inhabitants (Ingenio, Santa Lucía, San Bartolomé, Santa Brígida and Telde), two samples were taken.

Fig. 1 Gran Canaria and its 21 municipalities. The greyscale represents the following isoclimatic zones: Dd, dry desert; Ds, dry steppe; Tm, temperate mild; Tc, temperate cold. *Municipalities tested twice each sampling row. 1: Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (capital). 2: Telde*. 3: Ingenio*. 4: Agüimes. 5: Santa Lucía*. 6: San Bartolomé de Tirajana*. 7: Mogán. 8: La Aldea de San Nicolás. 9: Agaete. 10: Gáldar. 11:Guía. 12: Firgas. 13: Arucas. 14: Teror. 15: Santa Brígida*. 16: Moya. 17: Valsequillo. 18: Artenara. 19: Valleseco. 20: San Mateo. 21: Tejeda. Scale bar = 10 km.

Faeces were stored in dry sterile containers and sent to the Parasitology Laboratory of the Veterinary Faculty of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University, where they were kept refrigerated until processing within 24–48 h. The European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP) guidelines 2020 were considered to determine the techniques used, such as sodium chloride flotation (Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Moreira, Pena, Coimbra-Marinho, Bahia and Machado-Coelho2012), formol-ether sedimentation (Ritchie, Reference Ritchie1948) and zinc sulphate centrifugal flotation (Faust et al., Reference Faust, D'Antoni, Odom, Miller, Peres, Sawitz, Thomen, Tobie and Walker1938). Larvae of lungworms were also tested using the Baerman–Wetzel method (Giannelli et al., Reference Giannelli, Brianti and Varcasia2015).

Statistics and isoclimatic zones of Gran Canaria

All the statistics were processed using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Washington, US)®, applying the chi-square function, as well as prevalence ratios. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. A ratio was estimated to study the odds of finding a parasite in an isoclimatic zone depending on the season: the number of samples from an isoclimatic zone where a specific parasite was identified in the wet season was divided by the number of samples taken in the same isoclimatic zone during the dry season where that parasite was also identified.

The samples were grouped by isoclimatic zones and by precipitation: dry season (spring–summer) and wet/temperate season (autumn–winter). Gran Canaria has four different isoclimatic zones (Rodríguez-Ponce et al., Reference Rodríguez-Ponce, Molina and Hernandez1995), ranging from sea level to the central peak of the island describing concentric circles (fig. 1) as follows: dry desert zone (Dd), around sea level; dry steppe zone (Ds), higher places up to 200 m, with temperatures above 18°C all year round and very dry summers; temperate mild zone (Tm), 200 to 800 m in altitude with winter temperatures below 18°C and heavy rainfall in the wet season, followed by dry and hot summers; and temperate cold zone (Tc), from 800 m to the highest point of the island, midlands, with a similar climate throughout the year to the previous zone, but with a lower average temperature during the wet and dry seasons.

Results

Overall results

A total amount of 290 stool samples were analysed for parasites, distributed by municipalities, isoclimatic zones and season, as shown in tables 1–4.

Table 1. Number of samples (n) per municipality and their isoclimatic zones (IC).

Dd, dry desert; Ds, dry steppe; Tc, temperate cold; Tm, temperate mild.

Table 2. Epidemiological data of the protozoans ordered by isoclimate and season studied.

Tc, temperate cold; Tm, temperate mild; Ds, dry desert; Ds, dry steppe; W, wet; D, dry; O, overall; IZ, isoclimatic zone; n, total number of samples analysed.

Table 3. Epidemiological data of the cestodes ordered by isoclimate and season studied.

Tc, temperate cold; Tm, temperate mild; Ds, dry desert; Ds, dry steppe; W, wet; D, dry; O, overall; IZ, isoclimatic zone; n, total number of samples analysed.

Table 4. Epidemiological data of the nematodes ordered by isoclimate and season studied.

Tc, temperate cold; Tm, temperate mild; Ds, dry desert; Ds, dry steppe; W, wet; D, dry; O, overall; IZ, isoclimatic zone; n, total number of samples analysed.

Nematodes were the most prevalent parasites (52.4%). Within this group, Ancylostoma spp. appeared in a larger number of samples (28.6%), followed by bronchopulmonary nematodes (28.3%) and the roundworms Toxocara cati (11.7%) and Toxascaris leonina (2.1%). Other nematodes were present in lower percentages: Physaloptera spp. (2.1%) and Trichuris spp. (0.7%).

Protozoa were the second most isolated taxa (21.4%). Giardia spp. were found in the largest number of samples (12.4%), followed by Cystoisospora felis (9.3%), Cystoisospora rivolta (1.7%) and Toxoplasma gondii (0.7%).

The tapeworms (20.3%) were non-egg-cluster producers from the family Dipylidiidae (Joyeuxiella spp. and Diplopylidium spp.) (16.6%) followed by Taenia spp. (1.4%) and Mesocestoides spp. (0.3%).

Isoclimatic and seasonal statistics

Nematodes were identified more than any other parasite group in every isoclimatic zone (P < 0.05) (table 4), showing their lowest value in the Dd zone (29.3%). In terms of nematode families, Ancylostoma spp. and lungworms were more prevalent than roundworms in Tm and Ds zones (P = 0.024). The highest prevalence of all nematode taxa was recorded in the Tc zone. Protozoa were observed in greater numbers in the Tm zone, while cestodes in the Dd zone.

In terms of seasonal patterns, protozoans were significantly more frequent in the wet than in the dry season (P = 0.003). Furthermore, the prevalence ratio between wet and dry season was, in all cases, close to unity, except for Giardia spp., which was 3.1 times higher in the wet season.

Discussion

Zoonotic risk and disease reservoir

Few zoonotic species have been isolated in this work such as Ancylostoma spp., T. cati and Giardia spp., with a low prevalence of T. gondii. However, the ecology of T. gondii on Gran Canaria is a clear example of how much feral cat colonies can affect not only humans but also livestock and wildlife.

Previous studies on Gran Canaria alarmingly revealed more than 60% seropositivity to T. gondii in humans and livestock (Rodríguez-Ponce et al., Reference Rodríguez-Ponce, Molina and Hernandez1995), affecting almost 80% of humans aged over 60 years (Rodríguez-Ponce, Reference Rodríguez-Ponce1994). The low detection of oocysts in faeces may also be influenced by the erratic pattern of excretion of this parasite, usually reaching a prevalence of 1% in cats shedding oocysts at any given time (Dubey, Reference Dubey2010; Elmore et al., Reference Elmore, Jones, Conrad, Patton, Lindsay and Dubey2010).

Larva migrans is a relatively important zoonotic disease in certain countries of the world, even regarded as a hazard to travellers (Norris, Reference Norris1971; Jelinek et al., Reference Jelinek, Maiwald, Nothdurft and Löscher1994; Sow et al., Reference Sow, Soro, Javelle, Simon, Parola and Gautret2017). Furthermore, a seroepidemiological study on the visceral larva migrans producer, Toxocara spp., revealed a prevalence of less than 6% in humans (Jiménez et al., Reference Jiménez, Valladares, Fernández-Palacios, de Armasn and del Castillo1997), including a paediatric case of ocular toxocariosis (Cejas et al., Reference Cejas, Bernal, Rodríguez-Melián and Batista2016). These diseases seem to be more related to children, as they can be more exposed at playgrounds, which are frequented by either cats or dogs, contaminated with larvated eggs of Toxocara spp. (Wright et al., Reference Wright, Stafford and Coles2016) or third-stage larvae of Ancylostoma (Jelinek et al., Reference Jelinek, Maiwald, Nothdurft and Löscher1994). In addition to direct infection through the environment, toxocariasis can be regarded as a food-borne pathogen since contaminated vegetables are a common source of infection (Healy et al., Reference Healy, Morgan, Prada and Betson2022). Hence, the high prevalences of Ancylostoma spp. and T. cati reported in this study represent a clear public health problem that must be addressed, particularly considering the probable indoor shedding by contaminated domestic cats.

While genotype F or Giardia cati (Feng & Xiao, Reference Feng and Xiao2011) (non-zoonotic) is the most common in cats (55.8%) (Ramírez-Ocampo et al., Reference Ramírez-Ocampo, Cotte-Alzate, Escobedo and Rodríguez-Morales2017), almost four out of ten isolations (Ramírez-Ocampo et al., Reference Ramírez-Ocampo, Cotte-Alzate, Escobedo and Rodríguez-Morales2017) belong to zoonotic species: Giardia duodenalis sensu stricto or genotype A (Feng & Xiao, Reference Feng and Xiao2011). Every year, more than 150 native cases of giardiosis are documented on the Canary Islands, mainly on the two capital islands – that is, 101 cases in Gran Canaria in 2018 (Canary Islands Health Service, 2018). Thus, the 12% reported in this study should be treated as potential zoonoses. Furthermore, kittens may also harbour other zoonotic species, Giardia enterica or genotype B, which in the Canary Islands is only documented in rodents from La Palma (Western Canary Islands) (Fernández-Álvarez et al., Reference Fernández-Álvarez, Martín-Alonso, Abreu-Acosta, Feliu, Hugot, Valladares and Foronda2014). Since no other known potential wildlife sources of Giardia duodenalis have been identified, further sampling for molecular studies should be considered to evaluate the real risk of this flagellate from feral cats.

Climatic influence

These data suggest that local climatic conditions seem to be more important than seasons for most parasites, except for protists. In the same line, warmer and more humid areas like the Tm are more ideal for parasites to reproduce. However, linked to the transmission of zoonotic parasites in suburban areas is the adaptation of intermediate hosts to these environments, which is influenced not only by the direct effect of urban development but also climatic conditions (Mackenstedt et al., Reference Mackenstedt, Jenkins and Romig2015). The best example highlighted in this study are cestodes.

The tapeworms reported here are non-egg cluster producers from the family Dipylidiidae, which comprises two genera with similar ecology: Joyeuxiella spp. and Diplopylidium spp. No information is available on the actual intermediate host of these cestodes, but their cysticercoids have been extensively reported in several poikilothermic animals (Witenberg, Reference Witenberg1932; Roca, Reference Roca1985). In Gran Canaria, the endemic Boettger's wall gecko (Tarentola boettgeri) is the only reptile included in the diet of cats, reported to be infected with either cestode (Roca et al., Reference Roca, García-Adell, López and Zapatero-Ramos1987, Reference Roca, Martin and Carbonell1999; Santana-Hernández & Rodríguez-Ponce, Reference Santana-Hernández and Rodríguez-Ponce2019). The population density of this gecko decreases with altitude (from sea level up to 750 m), with higher densities in the Dd areas (Mateo, Reference Mateo, Pleguezuelos, Márquez and Lizana2002) – a fact which could account for the higher prevalence of cestodes in cats from Dd zones on the island. In addition, by preying on geckoes, two species of Diplopylidium are being transmitted to another important invasive species on Gran Canaria, the California Kingsnake (Lampropeltis californiae) (Santana-Hernández et al., Reference Santana-Hernández, Orós, Priestnall, Monzón-Argüello and Rodríguez-Ponce2021). Hence, the life cycle of Diplopylidium spp. highlights the urgent need to control invasive species such as feral cat colonies and their co-invasive parasites to preserve Gran Canaria's fragile biodiversity.

However, added to the benefits of paratenic/invertebrate host usage, environmental resistance is a key feature for the survival of parasites. Ancylostoma, for example, is clearly sensitive to desiccation and sunlight, which explains its higher prevalence in Tc–Ds areas in contrast to Dd areas, where the action of the paratenic host may have a crucial role in their survival. Similarly, the use of land molluscs by lungworms is evidently limited to areas with higher densities of these animals, such as Ds and higher areas, with superior humidity to Dd areas. Thus, it suggests more benevolent climatic conditions for egg and larvae to survive.

Despite these patterns, mean temperature and precipitation in a specific location seemed to have a stronger influence on parasite prevalence than seasonal fluctuations in this study. The only recorded seasonal fluctuation was the prevalence of C. felis and Giardia spp. during the wet season. This high humidity could suggest more benevolent conditions for protists to survive. Similar patterns have been described by other authors, but no further conclusions have been formulated (Barutzki & Schaper, Reference Barutzki and Schaper2011).

In conclusion, islands similar to Gran Canaria could be used as model ecosystems to evaluate the influence of climate on parasite communities in wildlife and with further sampling, the potential consequences of climate change on parasitic biodiversity.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Esther Díaz and Irene Cabello for their collaboration and support during the sample processing, and also Mr de Blas.

Financial support

This research was co-funded by the Faculty of Veterinary Science of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, which kindly permitted the use of its laboratories and technicians for the processing of the samples, and also Escaleritas Small Animal Practice in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, who contributed to the sampling costs.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the care and use of laboratory animals.

References

Barutzki, D and Schaper, R (2011) Results of parasitological examinations of faecal samples from cats and dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitology Research 109, 4560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beugnet, F, Bourdeau, P, Chalvet-Monfray, K, et al. (2014) Parasites of domestic owned cats in Europe: co-infestations and risk factors. Parasites & Vectors 7, 291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canary Islands Health Service (2018) Sistema de Enfermedades de Declaración Obligatoria (EDO) Red Canaria de Vigilancia Epidemiológica. Casos notificados por Área de Salud y tipo de caso, Canarias 2018. Available at https://www3.gobiernodecanarias.org/sanidad/scs/content/644d3d8d-deae-11e9-b205-1d1fd94d7542/Casos_tasas_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, GLXd, Moreira, LE, Pena, JL, Coimbra-Marinho, C, Bahia, MT and Machado-Coelho, GLL (2012) A comparative study of the TF-Test®, Kato-Katz, Hoffman-Pons-Janer, Willis and Baermann-Moraes coprologic methods for the detection of human parasitosis. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 107, 8084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cejas, G, Bernal, L, Rodríguez-Melián, LJ and Batista, D (2016) Toxocariasis ocular infantil. Archivos de La Sociedad Canaria de Oftalmología 27, 6871.Google Scholar
Dubey, JP (2010) Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. 2nd edn. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Elmaleck, BSA (2015) Effect of seasonal variations on distribution of parasites in camels at Assiut locality. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology 7, 16.Google Scholar
Elmore, SA, Jones, JL, Conrad, PA, Patton, S, Lindsay, DS and Dubey, JP (2010) Toxoplasma gondii: epidemiology, feline clinical aspects, and prevention. Trends in Parasitology 26, 190196.Google ScholarPubMed
European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP) (2020) ESCCAP Guideline 1—worm control in dogs and cats (sixth ed.). Available at https://www.esccap.org/uploads/docs/qjyqgckk_0778_ESCCAP_Guideline_GL1_v12_1p.pdfGoogle Scholar
Faust, EC, D'Antoni, JS, Odom, V, Miller, MJ, Peres, C, Sawitz, W, Thomen, LF, Tobie, J and Walker, H (1938) A critical study of clinical laboratory technics for the diagnosis of protozoan cysts and helminth eggs in feces. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 18, 169183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Y and Xiao, L (2011) Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 24, 110140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Álvarez, Á, Martín-Alonso, A, Abreu-Acosta, N, Feliu, C, Hugot, JP, Valladares, B and Foronda, P (2014) Identification of a novel assemblage G subgenotype and a zoonotic assemblage B in rodent isolates of Giardia duodenalis in the Canary Islands, Spain. Parasitology 141, 206215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannelli, A, Brianti, E, Varcasia, A, et al. (2015) Efficacy of Broadline® spot-on against Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus brevior lungworms in naturally infected cats from Italy. Veterinary Parasitology 209, 273277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, SR, Morgan, ER, Prada, JM and Betson, M (2022) First report demonstrating the presence of Toxocara spp. eggs on vegetables grown in community gardens in Europe. Food and Waterborne Parasitology 27, e00158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelinek, T, Maiwald, H, Nothdurft, HD and Löscher, T (1994) Cutaneous larva migrans in travelers: Synopsis of histories, symptoms, and treatment of 98 patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases 19, 10621066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiménez, JF, Valladares, B, Fernández-Palacios, JM, de Armasn, F and del Castillo, A (1997) A serologic study of human Toxocariasis in the Canary Islands (Spain): Environmental influences. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 56, 113115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackenstedt, U, Jenkins, D and Romig, T (2015) The role of wildlife in the transmission of parasitic zoonoses in peri-urban and urban areas. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4, 7179.Google ScholarPubMed
Martens, P (1999) How will climate change affect human health? The question poses a huge challenge to scientists. Yet the consequences of global warming of public health remain largely unexplored. American Scientist 87, 534541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, JA (2002) Tarentola boettgeri Steindachner, 1891. Perenquén de Boettger. pp. 182183. In Pleguezuelos, JM, Márquez, R and Lizana, M (Eds) Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y reptiles de España. 2nd edn. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Medina, FM and Nogales, M (2009) A review on the impacts of feral cats (Felis silvestris catus) in the Canary Islands: implications for the conservation of its endangered fauna. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 829846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S, McIntyre, KM and Baylis, M (2014) Domesticated animals and human infectious diseases of zoonotic origin: domestication time matters. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 24, 7681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, DE (1971) The migratory behavior of the infective-stage larvae of Ancylostoma braziliense and Ancylostoma tubaeforme in rodent paratenic hosts. The Journal of Parasitology 57, 9981009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okoye, IC, Obiezue, NR, Okoh, FN and Amadi, EC (2013) Descriptive epidemiology and seasonality of intestinal parasites of cats in Southeast Nigeria. Comparative Clinical Pathology 23, 9991005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Ocampo, S, Cotte-Alzate, JD, Escobedo, ÁA and Rodríguez-Morales, AJ (2017) Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic genotypes of Giardia intestinalis in cats: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Le Infezioni in Medicina 4, 326338.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L (1948) An ether sedimentation technique for routine stool examination. Bulletin of the U.S. Army Medical Department 8, 326327.Google Scholar
Roca, V (1985) Contribución al conocimiento de la helmintofauna de los Lacértidos y Geckónidos del piso termomediterraneo del levante Ibérico. Doctoral dissertation, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
Roca, V, García-Adell, G, López, E and Zapatero-Ramos, LM (1987) Algunas formas adultas y larvarias de platelmintos de reptiles de las Islas Canarias. Revista Iberica de Parasitologia 47, 263270.Google Scholar
Roca, V, Martin, JE and Carbonell, E (1999) Helminths parasitising endemic geckoes from Canary Islands. Miscelánea Zoologica 22, 101108.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ponce, E (1994) Seroprevalencia de la toxoplasmosis en las especies humana, caprina y bovina en Gran Canaria. Doctoral dissertation, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2193Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ponce, E, Molina, JM and Hernandez, S (1995) Seroprevalence of goat toxoplasmosis on Grand Canary Island (Spain). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 24, 229234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Ponce, E, González, JF, Conde de Felipe, M, Hernandez, JN and Jaber, JR (2016) Epidemiological survey of zoonotic helminths in feral cats in Gran Canaria Island (Macaronesian archipelago-Spain). Acta Parasitologica 61, 443450.Google Scholar
Rondón, S, Ortiz, M, León, C, Galvis, N, Link, A and González, C (2017) Seasonality, richness and prevalence of intestinal parasites of three neotropical primates (Alouatta seniculus, Ateles hybridus and Cebus versicolor) in a fragmented forest in Colombia. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 6, 202208.Google Scholar
Santana-Hernández, KM and Rodríguez-Ponce, E (2019) Definitive and paratenic hosts for Joyeuxiella pasqualei in Gran Canaria: a new host record for Spain. XXI Congreso de La Sociedad Española de Parasitología, E Inter Europeo de Parasitología. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335149283_Definitive_and_paratenic_hosts_for_Joyeuxiella_pasqualei_in_Gran_Canaria_a_new_host_record_for_SpainGoogle Scholar
Santana-Hernández, KM, Orós, J, Priestnall, SL, Monzón-Argüello, C and Rodríguez-Ponce, E (2021) Parasitological findings in the invasive California kingsnake (Lampropeltis californiae) in Gran Canaria, Spain. Parasitology 148, 13451352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, EE, Caminade, C and Thomas, BN (2017) Climate change contribution to the emergence or re-emergence of parasitic diseases. Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment 10, 17.Google ScholarPubMed
Sow, D, Soro, F, Javelle, E, Simon, F, Parola, P and Gautret, P (2017) Epidemiological profile of cutaneous larva migrans in travelers returning to France between 2003 and 2015. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 20, 6164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witenberg, G (1932) On the cestode subfamily Dipylidiinae stiles. Zeitschrift Für Parasitenkunde 4, 542584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I, Stafford, K and Coles, G (2016) The prevalence of intestinal nematodes in cats and dogs from Lancashire, North-West England. Journal of Small Animal Practice 57, 393395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X, Yang, G, Yang, K, et al. (2008) Potential impact of climate change on Schistosomiasis Transmission in China. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78, 188194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Gran Canaria and its 21 municipalities. The greyscale represents the following isoclimatic zones: Dd, dry desert; Ds, dry steppe; Tm, temperate mild; Tc, temperate cold. *Municipalities tested twice each sampling row. 1: Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (capital). 2: Telde*. 3: Ingenio*. 4: Agüimes. 5: Santa Lucía*. 6: San Bartolomé de Tirajana*. 7: Mogán. 8: La Aldea de San Nicolás. 9: Agaete. 10: Gáldar. 11:Guía. 12: Firgas. 13: Arucas. 14: Teror. 15: Santa Brígida*. 16: Moya. 17: Valsequillo. 18: Artenara. 19: Valleseco. 20: San Mateo. 21: Tejeda. Scale bar = 10 km.

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of samples (n) per municipality and their isoclimatic zones (IC).

Figure 2

Table 2. Epidemiological data of the protozoans ordered by isoclimate and season studied.

Figure 3

Table 3. Epidemiological data of the cestodes ordered by isoclimate and season studied.

Figure 4

Table 4. Epidemiological data of the nematodes ordered by isoclimate and season studied.