Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:24:06.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The significance of the tail projections in female entomopathogenic nematodes within the family Steinernematidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Z. Mráček ,
V. Půža  and
J. Nermut'
Z. Mráček
Affiliation:
Biology Centre ASCR, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, 370 05Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic
V. Půža*
Affiliation:
Biology Centre ASCR, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, 370 05Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic
J. Nermut'
Affiliation:
Biology Centre ASCR, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, 370 05Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several taxonomic studies of the entomopathogenic nematode family Steinernematidae have reported on the minute tail projections on the tail tips of females of the first generation; however, the occurrence and morphology of these traits in other steinernematid species and their taxonomic significance are still unclear. In the present study, the tail projections in females of seven steinernematid species belonging to four phylogenetic clades were examined. The projections are present in all of the tested species and their number and shape is consistent within species but significantly differs among species. It thus seems that these structures may have taxonomic significance at the species level. Based on these results, we suggest that every description of a new species in the family Steinernematidae should contain a precise morphology of the female tail, focused on these projections, using both light and scanning electron microscopy.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 249 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hominick, W.M., Briscoe, B.R., del Pino, F.G., Jian, H., Hunt, D.J., Kozodoy, E., Mráček, Z., Nguyen, K.B., Reid, A.P., Spiridonov, S., Stock, P., Sturhan, D., Waturu, C. & Yoshida, M. (1997) Biosystematics of entomopathogenic nematodes: current status, protocols and definitions. Journal of Helminthology 71, 271–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maggenti, A. (1981) General nematology. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mráček, Z., Weiser, J. & Gerdin, S. (1981) Head and cuticular structures of some species in the family Steinernematidae (Nematoda). Nematologica 27, 443–448.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K.B. & Duncan, L.W. (2002) Steinernema diaprepesi n. sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), a parasite of the citrus root weevil Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Nematology 34, 159–170.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K.B., Hunt, D.J. & Mráček, Z. (2007) Steinernematidae: species description. pp. 121–609 in Nguyen, K.B. & Hunt, D.J. (Eds) Entomopathogenic nematodes: Systematics, phylogeny and bacterial symbionts. Leiden, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G.O. Jr (1986) Neoaplectana intermedia n. sp. (Steinernematidae: Nematoda) from South Carolina. Revue de Nématologie 8, 321–327.Google Scholar
Seinhorst, J.W. (1959) A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica 4, 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southey, J.F. (1970) Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. London, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Sturhan, D., Spiridonov, S. & Mráček, Z. (2005) Steinernema silvaticum sp. n. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), a new entomopathogenic nematode from Europe. Nematology 7, 227–241.Google Scholar
Triggiani, O., Mráček, Z. & Reid, A. (2004) Steinernema apuliae sp. n. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae): a new entomopathogenic nematode from southern Italy. Zootaxa 460, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar