Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:34:57.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The serodiagnosis of human hydatid disease: 2. Additional studies on selected sera using indirect haemagglutination (IHA), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and defined antigen substrate spheres (DASS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

R. M. Matossian
Affiliation:
Ross Institute of Tropical Hygiene, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
Moira L. McLaren
Affiliation:
Ross Institute of Tropical Hygiene, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
C. C. Draper
Affiliation:
Ross Institute of Tropical Hygiene, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
C. M. Patricia Bradstreet
Affiliation:
Standards Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT
Mabel W. Dighero
Affiliation:
Standards Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT
G. J. Kane
Affiliation:
Wellcome Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent
L. M. Mackinlay
Affiliation:
Wellcome Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent
M. D. Rickard
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London SW7

Abstract

Sixty-one serum samples selected on the basis of reactivity in the complement fixation (CF) and latex agglutination (LA) test, were further examined for sensitivity and specificity by indirect haemagglutination (IHA), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and defined antigen substrate spheres (DASS). Twenty sera from healthy Europeans and 48 samples from patients with either schistosomiasis or trichinosis were also tested. Comparable levels of sensitivity were found between the CF and LA positive sera and IHA, ELISA and DASS. Of the CF positive LA negative group of sera, many were positive by DASS but only a few reacted in IHA and ELISA. Some cross reactivity was also observed in the schistosomiasis sera tested by IHA and ELISA.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ambroise-Thomas, P. (1976) Immunofluorescence in the diagnosis, therapeutic follow-up and seroepidemiological studies of some parasitic diseases. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 70, 107112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradstreet, C. M. P. (1969) A study of two immunological tests in the diagnosis and prognosis of hydatid disease. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2, 419433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castagnari, L. and Sorice, F. (1971) Crossed-over electrophoresis in the serological diagnosis of hydatid disease. Preliminary note. Giornare di Malatti Infective e Parasitarie, 23, 225227.Google Scholar
Deelder, A. M. and Ploem, J. S. (1974) An immunofluorescence reaction for Schistosoma mansoni using defined antigen substrate spheres (DASS) system. Journal of Immunological Methods, 4, 239251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dessaint, J. P., Bout, D., Wattre, P. and Capron, A. (1975) Quantitative determination of specific IgE antibodies to Echinococcus granulosus and IgE levels in sera from patients with hydatid disease. Immunology, 29, 813823.Google ScholarPubMed
Engvall, E. and Perlmann, P. (1972) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA. III. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme labelled anti-globulin in antigen-coated tubes. Journal of Immunology, 109, 129135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farag, A., Bout, D. and Capron, A. (1975) Specific immunodiagnosis of hydatidosis by the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Biomedicine, 23, 276278.Google Scholar
Fischman, A. (1965) Reactivity of latex and complement fixation tests in hydatid disease. Journal of Parasitology, 51, 497500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garabedian, G. A. (1971) Evaluation of the reactivity of hydatid whole scolex antigen in hydatid disease serology. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 65, 385391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowry, D. M., Rosenbrorght, N. J., Fan, A. L. and Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matossian, R. M. (1977) The immunological diagnosis of human hydatid disease. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 71, No. 2, 101104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, M., Draper, C. C., Roberts, J. M., Minter-Goedbloed, E., Ligthart, G. S., Teesdale, C. H., Amin, M. A., Omer, A. H. S., Bartlett, A. and Voller, A. (1978) Studies on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for Schistosoma mansoni infections. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 72, 243254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musioni, P., Piantelli, M., Arru, E. and Pozzuoli, R. (1975) A solid phase radioimmunoassay for the diagnosis of human hydatidosis. Journal of Immunology, 112, 16741679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinon, J. M. (1976) Counter immunoelectrophoresis in the diagnosis of hydatid disease. Lancet, (i), 310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streefkerk, J. G., Deedler, A. M., Kors, N. and Kornelis, D. (1975) Antigen coupled beads adherent to slides: A simplified method for immunological studies. Journal of Immunological Methods, 8, 251256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voller, A., Huldt, G., Thors, C. and Engvall, E. (1975) New serological test for malaria antibodies. British Medical Journal, (i), 659661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voller, A., Bartlett, A., Bidwell, D. E. (1976a) Enzyme immunoassays in diagnostic medicine. Theory and Practice. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 53, 251256.Google ScholarPubMed
Voller, A., Bartlett, A., Bidwell, D. E. (1976b) Enzyme immunoassays for parasitic diseases. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 70, 98106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar