Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:10:51.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the Genus Philometra Costa, 1845

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Suraiya Rasheed
Suraiya Rasheed
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Characters of taxonomic value in the family Philometridae are discussed; the important structures taken into account are the cuticle, cephalic papillae, oesophagus and the tail of the parasite.

2. Two new species of Philometra are described and Ph. lateolabracis Yamguti, 1935 is redescribed from new fishes of the Arabian Sea.

3. Two new subgenera have been made under the genus Philometra and named as Ranjhinema and Alinetna.

4. Philomeiroides piedropliies (Johnston and Mawson, 1940) and Ph. anguillac (Ishii, 1916) are redescribed.

5. Buckleyella and Thwaitia are described as new genera, the diagnosis being based on the structure of the cuticle, cephalic papillae and the tail.

6. A key to the genera of Philometridae is provided with the diagnosis of each genus and subgenus. Some of the species formerly described under Philometra are provisionally transferred to other genera of this family.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 37 , Issue 1-2 , March 1963 , pp. 89 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylis, H. A., 1927.—“Some parasitic worms from Arapaima gigas (Teleostcan fish) with a description of Philometra senticosa n.sp. (Filarioidea).” Parasitology, 19, 35–47.Google Scholar
Cakay, E., 1957.—“Nalez Philometra sanguined (Rudolphi, 1819) Na Slovenskv.” Biologia Bratislava, 12, 909–914.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. and Chitwood, M. B., 1937.—“An introduction to Nematology.”Google Scholar
Costa, O. G., 1845.—“Entozoa trovata entre le ovaie dell' Uranoscopus scaber.” Ann. ace. aspir. nat. Napoli, 3, 76–80.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M., 1861.—“Revision der Nematoden.” S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 42.Google Scholar
Dogiel, V. and Bychovsky, B., 1934.—“Die Fischparasiten des Aral-Sees.” Mag. parasit., Moscow, 4, 241–344.Google Scholar
Fujita, T., 1939.—“On the Nematode parasites of the Pacific Salmon.” J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ., 42, 239–206.Google Scholar
Fujita, T., 1940.—“Further notes on nematodes of salmonoid fishes in Japan.” Jap. J. Zool., 8, 389–390.Google Scholar
Furuyama, T., 1934.—“On the morphology and life history of Philometra fujimoloi Furuyama, 1932.” J. med. Coll. Keijo, 5, 105–177.Google Scholar
Holl, F. J., 1932.—“The ecology of certain fishes and amphibians, with special reference to their helminth and linguatulid parasites.” Ecol. Monogr., 2, 83–107.Google Scholar
Isiiii, S., 1916.—“On Filaria angnillae n. sp. parasitic in the orbit of Japanese eels.” Dobutu Saku Zassi, 28, 214–220.Google Scholar
Jagerskiŏld, L. A., 1893.—“Bidrag Kănnedomcn om nematodcrna.” Akad Afh. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Janiszewska, J., 1949.—“Some fish nematodes from the Adriatic Sea.” Zool. Polon., 5, 7–30.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1940.—“Some Nematodes Parasitic in Australian Freshwater fish.” Trans, roy. Soc. S. Australia, 64, 340–352.Google Scholar
Krecker, F. H., 1915.—“Filaria cingula parasitic in the skin of Cryptobranchus allegheniensis.” J. Parasit., 2, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, L. F., 1960.—“On a new Nematode, Nilonema gymnarchi gen. ct sp. nov. (Dracunculidae) from a freshwater Fish in the Sudan,” J. Helminth. 34, 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuitunen-Ekbaum, E., 1933a.—“A case of Dracontiasis in Pacific coastal fishes.” Contr. Canad. Biol., 8, 163–168.Google Scholar
Kuitunen-Ekbaum, E., 1933b.—“Philonema oncorhynchi nov. gen. et spec.” Contr. Canad. Biol. (N.S.), 8, 71–75.Google Scholar
Layman, E. M., 1930.—“Parasitic worms from the fishes of Peter the Great Bay.” Bull. Pacific sci. Inst. Fish. Vladivostok, 3, 120.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1856.—“A synopsis of Entozoa and some of their Ectocongencrs, observed by the author.” Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 56.Google Scholar
Linstow, V., 1874.—“Ubcr Ichthyonema sanguineum (Filaria sanguinea).” Arch. Naturgesch., 40, 122.Google Scholar
Linstow, V., 1902.—“Beobachtungen an neuen und bekannten Nemathelminthen.” Arch, mikr. Anat., 60, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, V., 1909.—“Parasitischc Nematoden, Brauer.” Die Susswasser Fauna Deutschlands, 15.Google Scholar
Linton, E., 1901.—“Parasites of Fishes in the Woods Hole Region.” Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. 19, 267–405.Google Scholar
Del Lupo, M., 1898.—“Sopra una nuova specie di Ichthyonema.” Atti. Accad. Torino (W.C.), 33, 823–826.Google Scholar
Molin, 1859.—“Abhandlungen und Mittheilungen Cephalocotyleae Nematoidae.” S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien., 38, 32.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1928.—“Rudolphi's Filaria sanguinea wiedergefunden.” Ark. Zool, 19B, 1–4.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1931.—“Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von ‘Filaria sanguinea’ Rudolphi nebst Bemerkungen über verwandte Arten, insbesonderc über den Medina Wurm.” Zbl. Bakt., 121, 58–64.Google Scholar
Prenant, 1888.—“Rech. sur les vers parasites des poissons.” Bullet. Soc. Sci. Nancy, 2, 206–230.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1916.—“Nematodes parasites des Rongeurs.” Rec. Med. Vet., 519.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—“Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locuplctissimi.” Berolini, 10, 811.Google Scholar
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H., 1937.—“Parasitic Ncmatoda.” Explor. Parc. nat. Albert Miss. de Witte, 35–38.Google Scholar
Simon, J. R. and Simon, F., 1936.—“Philonema agubernaculum sp. nov. (Dracunculidae), a nematode from the body cavity of fishes.” Parasitology, 28, 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., 1923.—“Philometra rischta mini, cine interessante Fischfilaria aus Siberien.” Russk. gidrobiol. Zh. Saratow, 2, 230–240.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., 1954.—“Opredelitel' paraziticheskikh nematod”, 4, 62–90.Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1896.—“Ricerchc Elmintologiche. Elminti trovati in un Orthagoriscus mola.” Boll. Soc. adriat. Sci., 17, 123.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. J., 1929.—“Philomelra nodulosa nov. spec, with notes on the life history.” J. Parasit., 15, 103–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thwaite, J. W., 1927.—“On a collection of nematodes from Ceylon.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 21, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1960.—“Sobre nematodeos cavitorios de peixes do Rio Amazonas” Alas. Soc. Biol. Rio de J., 4,15–20.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., Artigas, P. E. and Pereira, R., 1929.—“Fauna Helmintholöjica dos peixes de água doce do Brasil.” Arch. Inst. Biol. S. Paulo, 1, 27.Google Scholar
Vaz, Z. and Pereira, C., 1934.—“Contribuição ao conhecimentodos nematoĩdes de peixes fluviáis do Brasil.” Arch. Inst. Biol. S. Paulo, 5, 87–103.Google Scholar
Walton, A. C., 1927.—“A revision of the nematodes of Leidy collection.” Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 79,49–163.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. and Magath, T. B., 1916.—“Notes on some Nematodes from freshwater fishes.” J. Parasit., 3, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicki, K., 1960.—“Philometrosis of crucian Carp.” Acta parasitologica polonica, 8, 181–194.Google Scholar
Willemoes-Suhm, V., 1870.—Z. Wiss. Zool., 21, 175–203.Google Scholar
Wülker, G., 1930.—“Über Nematoden aus Nordseetierenii.” Zool. Anz., 87, 293–304.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1935.—“Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan, Part 9. Nematodes of Fishes I.” Japan. J. Zool., 6, 337–386.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1941.—“Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan, Part 33. Nematodes of Fishes II.” Japan. J. Zool., 9, 343–396.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1961a.—“Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan, Part 57. Nematodes of Fishes III.” J. Helminth. R. T. Leiper Supplement, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1961b.—“The Nematodes of vertebrates.” Systema Helminthum, 3.Google Scholar
Yorke, W. and Maplestone, P. A., 1926.—The Nematode parasites of vertebrates. J. & A. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1803.—Anleitung zur Naturgeschichtc der Eingeweiderwurmer Bamberg.Google Scholar