Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:33:38.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the Genus Anisakis Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Ascaridata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J. T. Davey
J. T. Davey
Affiliation:
Fisheries Helminthology Unit (Natural Environment Research Council), Commonwealth Institute of Helminthology103 St. Peter's Street, St. Albans, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By clarifying which taxonomic characters are of specific significance and by defining the intra specific limits of individual morphological variations, seventeen species of the genus Anisakis were shown to represent only three distinguishable forms, these being Anisakis simplex (Rudoiphi, 1809 det. Krabbe, 1878), A. typica (Diesing, 1860) and A. physeteris Baylis, 1923. The morphological characters in order of importance for identifying these species are the spicules, the postanal papillae, the form of the ventriculus, the position of the vulva and the form of the lips. These three species were also found to be satisfactory when discussed in geographical and ecological terms.

The four remaining species in the genus, Anisakis dussumierii (van Beneden, 1870), A. alexandri Hsü and Hoeppli, 1933, A. insignis (Diesing, 1851) and A. schupakovi Mozgovoi, 1915 are retained as species inquirendae for lack of sufficient information concerning them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 51 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, H. T., 1969.—The biology of marine mammals. Academic Press, N.Y. and London, xii + 511 pp.Google Scholar
Baird, W., 1853.—Catalogue of the species of Entozoa, or intestinal worms, contained in the collection of the British Museum. London, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1916.—“Some ascarids in the British Museum (Natural History).” Parasitology, 8, 360–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1920.—“On the classification of the Ascaridae. I. The systematic value of certain characters of the alimentary canal.” Parasitology, 12, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1923.—“Some ascarid from the sperm whale.” Ann. Mag. net. Hist., Ser. 9. 11, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1929.—“Parasitic Nematoda and Acanthocephala collected in 1925–27.” ‘Discovery’ Rep., 1, 541–560.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1937.—“On ascarids parasitic in seals, with special reference to the genus Contracaecum.” Parasitology, 29, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1939.—“Further records of parasitic worms from British vertebrates.” Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 11. 4, 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1944.—“‘Capsularia marina’ and the Ascaridae of marine hosts.” Parasitology, 36, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., and Daubney, R., 1926.—A synopsis of the families and genera of Nemaloda. London, xxxvi + 277 pp.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van, 1870.—“Lés cétacés, leurs commenceux et leurs parasites.” Bull. Acad. r. Belg. Cl. Sci., 29, 347–368.Google Scholar
Caballero, E. and Peregrina, D. I., 1939.—“Nemátodos de los mamiferos de México, I.” An. Inst. Biol. Univ. Méx., 9, 289–306.Google Scholar
Caldwell, D. K., Caldwell, M. C. and Rice, D. W., 1966.—Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises. (Norris, K. S., Ed.), pp. 677–717. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, California; quoted in Andersen, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana-Rouget, Y. and Biocca, E., 1955.—“Une nouvelle espèce d'Anisakis chez on phoque mediterranéen.” Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 30, 477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1888.—“Beiträge zur Anatomie und Ontogenie der Nematoden.” Jena. Z. Natur., 23, 41–76.Google Scholar
Crusz, H., 1946.—“Contributions to the helminthology of Ceylon: II. Notes on some parasitic nematodes, with a description of Anisakis tursiopis sp. nov.” Ceylon. J. Sci. Sect. B. Zool., 23, 57–66.Google Scholar
Delyamure, S. L., 1955.—Helminthofauna of marine mammals. Ed. Skryabin, K. I.. Israel Program for Scientific Publications. Jerusalem, 1968. ix + 522 pp.Google Scholar
Deslongchamps, E. E., 1824.—“Filocapsularia.” Encycl. Methodique, Paris, 2, 398–400.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1851.—Syslema Helminthum, II. Berlin, vi + 588 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1860.—“Revision der Nematoden.” Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 42, 595–736.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1948.—“Nématode à oesophage sigmoïde de l'estomac d'une Orca orca (L. 1789) (cétacé odontocète). Liste des Anisakis des cétacés et des pinnipédes.” Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 23, 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P. 1966.—“Helminthofaune de Kogia breviceps (Blainville, 1838) cétacé odontocète.” Annls Soc. Sci. nat. Charente-Marit., 4, 3–6.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1968.—“Nematodes des cétacés odontocète (Globicephalus et Tursiops).” Bull. Inst. Pêch. marit. Maroc., 16, 35–53.Google Scholar
Drasche, R. von., 1881.—“Zur Characteristik der Nematoden Gattung Peritrackelius Diesing.” Verh. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wein., 31, 187–194.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—Histoire Naturelle des Helminthes ou vers intestinaux. Paris, xvi + 654 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, H., 1870.—“Sur les Entozoaires des Dauphins.” C. r. hebd. Séanc. A cad, Sci., Paris., 71, 779–781.Google Scholar
Grainger, J. N. R., 1959.—“The identity of the larval nematodes found in the body muscles of the cod (Gadus callarias L.).” Parasitology, 49, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinze, K., 1934.—“Die parasitischen Würmer.” Wiss. Ergebn. dt. Grönland Exped Alfred Wegener., 6, 185–189.Google Scholar
Hsü, H. F., 1933.—“A new nematode, Anisakis alata, from the walrus.” Peking net. Hist. Bull., 8, 59–62.Google Scholar
Hsü, H. F. and Hoeppli, R., 1933.—“On some parasitic nematodes collected in Amoy.” Peking net. Hist. Bull., 8, 155–168.Google Scholar
Jägerrkiöld, L. A., 1891.—“Einiges über die Schmarotzer der Nordatlantischen Balaenopteriden.” Biol. Fören. Förh., 3, 127–134.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1939.—“Internal parasites of the pygmy sperm whale.” Rec. S. Aust. Mus., 6, 263–274.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1942.—“Remarks on some parasitic nematodes.” Rec. S. Aust. Mus., 7, 183–186.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1943.—“Endoparasites from the subantarctic islands of New Zealand.” Rec. S. Aust. Mus., 7, 237–243.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1945.—“Parasitic Nematodes.” Rep. B.A.N.Z. antarct. Res. Exped. Series B.5. 73–159.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1951.—“Report on some parasitic nematodes from the Australian Museum.” Rec. Aust. Mus., 22, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagei, N., Oshima, T. and Takemura, A., 1967.—“Survey of Anisakis spp. (Anisakinae, Nematoda) in marine mammals on the coast of Japan.” Jap. J. Parasit., 16, 427–435.Google Scholar
Khalil, L. F., 1969.—“Larval nematodes in the herring (Clupea harengus) from British coastal waters and adjacent territories.” J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., 49, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. E., 1964.—The Seals of the World. Trustees of the British Museum of Natural History, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H., 1878.—“Saelernes og Tandhvalernes Spolorme.” Overs. K. danske Vidensk. Selsk. Forh., 1, 43–51.Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1939.—[Contribution to the knowledge of parasitic nematodes. IX. Parasitic nematodes from the Natural History Museum, Basle.] Zentbl. Bakt. ParasitKde., 145, 163–208.Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1945.—[Contribution to the knowledge of parasitic nematodes. XII. Parasitic nematodes from the tropics.] Revue suisse Zool., 52, 551–596.Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A. 1952.—[Contributions to the knowledge of parasitic nematodes. X. Parasitic nematodes of the Faroe region.] Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren., 114, 251–307.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1886.—“Notices of nematoid worms.” Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 38, ser. 3, 16, 308–313.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1891.—“Notices of Entozoa.” Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 42, 410–418.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von., 1880.—“Helminthologisches Untersuchungen.” Arch. Nelurgesch., 46, 41–51.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von., 1888.—“Report on the Entozoa collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876.” Zoology, 23, 1–19.Google Scholar
Lyster, L. L., 1940.—“Parasites of some Canadian sea mammals.” Can. J. Res., 18D, 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, L. and Pike, G. C., 1955.—“Some helminth parasites of Canadian Pacific whales.” J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 12, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozgovoi, A. A., 1949.—[A study of the anisakids of cetaceans.] Trudy gel'mint. Lab., 2, 26–40.Google Scholar
Mozgovoi, A. A., 1951.—[Ascarids of mammals of the U.S.S.R. (Anisakoidea).] Trudy gel'mint. Lab., 5, 12–22.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. F., 1927.—“The excretory system of Anisakis simplex.” Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., 5, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1802.—“Fortsetzung der beobachtungen über die Eingeweidewürmer.” Arch. Zool. Zoot., 2, 1–67.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1809.—Entozoorum sive vermium historia naturalis. 2, Amstelaedami, 457 pp.Google Scholar
Schupakov, I., 1936.—[The parasitofauna of the Caspian seal. The problem of the parasitofauna of relict animals.] Uchen. Zap. leningr. gos. Univ., 7, 134–143.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E., 1905.—“Notes on a collection of parasites belonging to the museum of the University College, Dundee.” Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. biol. Sci., 13, 95–102.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A., 1899.—“Internal parasites of the fur seal” in The fur seals and fur seal islands of the North Pacific Ocean. Washington. Part III 99–177.Google Scholar
Trail, P. H. van, 1966.—“The final hosts of the herring worm, Anisakis marina.” Trop. geogr. Med., 18, 310–328.Google Scholar
Wülker, G., 1930.—“Über Nematoden aus Nordseetieren.” Zool. Anz., 87, 293–302.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1961.—Systema Helminthum. II. Nematodes of Vertebrates. N.Y. Interscience Publishers Inc. Part I. 679 pp. Part II. pp. 681–1261.Google Scholar
Yokre, W. and Maplestone, P. A., 1926.—The nematode parasites of vertebrates. London, x + 536 pp.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1800.—Erster Nachtrag zier Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer. Leipzig. xx + 320 pp.Google Scholar