Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T08:02:33.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationships of the Nematode Superfamily Seuratoidea*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

William G. Inglis
William G. Inglis
Affiliation:
Western Australian Museum, Perth, W.A.**
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Echinonema cinctum is redescribed and referred to the Superfamily Seuratoidea: Seuratinema brevicaudatum is redescribed and the genus Seuratinema is provisionally accepted.

2. The structure of the head in several species of the Seuratoidea is described and it is shown that the mouth opening is bilaterally symmetrical in Seuratinema and Seuratum.

3. After a discussion on the developmental origins of the nematode head it is pointed out that all the labial structures in the Camallanidae and the Spiruroidea arise from a region of secondary elongation, i.e. from a cheilostome, while the paired jaws in the Cucullanidae arise as a modification of the oesophagus, i.e. are an oesophastome. As a consequence the family Cucullanidae is referred to the Seuratoidea : Ascaridida while the Camallanidae are left in the Spirurida.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 41 , Issue 2-3 , June 1967 , pp. 115 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, S. M., 1957.—“Studies on the nematode parasites of fishes and birds found in Hyderabad State.” Indian J. Helminth., 8, 1–83.Google Scholar
Ali, S. M. and Singh, S. N., 1954.—“On a new nematode, Buckleynema buckleyi gen. et sp. nov. (Quimperiidae) from a siluroid fish in Hyderabad Deccan”. J. Helminth., 28, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1930.—“Mission saharienne Augiras-Dréaper, 1927-1928. Parasitic nematodes”. Bull. Mus. Paris., 2, 117–130.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1934.—“A little known parasite of the eel”. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (10) 13, 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1939.—The fauna of British India, Ceylon and Burma. II. London.Google Scholar
Biocca, E. and Chabaud, A. G., 1951.—“Redescription de Seuratum mucronatum (Rud. 1809) (Nematoda-Cucullanidae).” Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 26, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chabaud, A. G., 1955.—“Remarques sur la symétrie céphalique des nématodes et hypothèses concernant l'éVolution de cette symétrie chez les phasmidiens parasites”. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 80, 314–323.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G., 1956.—“Structure céphalique de Gendria tilapiae Baylis, 1930”. Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 31, 310–311.Google ScholarPubMed
Chabaud, A. G., AND Brygoo, E. R., 1957.—“Deux nematodes parasites de Grenouilles á Madagascar: Falcaustra golvani n. sp. et Harentinema ambocaeca n. gen. n. sp.” Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 32, 385–397.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G., Campana-Rouget, Y. and Brygoo, E. R., 1959.—“Les nématodes Seuratoidea nov. supfam. et origine des Spirurida”. C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, 248, 1449–1451.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G., Campana-Rouget, Y. and Brygoo, E. R., 1960.—“Les nematodes Seuratoidea”. Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 35, 316–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabaud, A. G., AND Brygoo, E. R., 1964.—“L'endémisme chez les helminthes de Madagascar”. C.r. somm. Séanc. Soc. Biogéogr., 356, 3–13.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1950.—“Cephalic structures and stoma”. In An introduction to nematology. Section I. Anatomy (Edited by B. G. and M. B. Chitwood) Baltimore, pp.59–77.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G. and Wehr, E.E., 1934.—“The value of cephalic structures as characters in nematode classification, with special reference to the superfamily Spiruroidea”. Z. ParasitKde, 7, 273–335.Google Scholar
Desportes, C, 1947.—“Sur les caractèrcs spécifiques d'une nouvelle espèce de Cucullanidae, Seuratum cadarachense n. sp., de l'intestin du lérot (Eliomys quecinus L.)”. Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 22, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—Histoire naturelle des helminthes Ou vers inlestinaux. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipjev, I. N. and Schuurmans Stekhoven, J. H., 1941.—A manual of agricultural helminthology. Leiden.Google Scholar
Freitas, J. F., Teixeira De, 1956.—“Notas sôbre “Heterakidae” Railliet and Henry, 1914. (Ncmatoda: Subuluroidea”. Revta. bras. Biol., 16, 461–482.Google Scholar
Gendre, E., 1926.—“Sur un nématode nouveau, parasite despoissons.” Bull. Soc. Path, exot., 19, 799–802.Google Scholar
Gendre, E. in Joyeux, CH., Gendre, E. and Baer, J.G., 1928.—“Recherches sur les helminthes de l'Afrique Occidcntale Française”. Coll. Soc. Path. exot.. Monographic, 2, 1–120.Google Scholar
Gnédina, M. P., 1933.—“Sur un nématode nouveaux: Skrjabinura spiralis n.g., n. sp”. Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 11, 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. C, 1916.—“Nematode parasites of mammals of the orders Rodentia, Lagomorpha and Hyracoidea”. Proc. U.S. nain. Mus., 50, 1–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsü, H. F., 1933.—“On some paiasitic nematodes collected in China”. Parasitology, 24, 512–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, W. G., 1958.—“A redescription of the nematode Paraspidodera sellsi Morgan, 1927 and its removal to a new genus Morgascaridia”. J. Helm inth., 32, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglis, W. G., 1959.—“Some oxyurid parasites (Nematoda) from Ochotona rufescens vizier (Mammalia: Lagomorpha) in Iran.” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 84, 178–187.Google Scholar
Inglis, W. G., 1961.—“Free-living marine nematodes from South Africa”. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., (Zoology), 7, 291–319.Google Scholar
Inglis, W. G., 1965.—“The functional and developmental significance of the cephalic septum in the Ascaridoidea (Nematoda)”. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., 176, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, W. G. 1965a.—“Patterns of evolution in parasitic nematodes”, in Evolution of parasites. 3rd Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology, pp. 79–124.Google Scholar
Inglis, W. G. 1966.—“The origin and function of the cheilostomal complex in the nematode Falcaustra stewarti”. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., 177, 55–02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, W. G. and Chabaud, A. G., 1960.—“Sur la systématique des Schneiderne-matinae (Nematoda)”. Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 35, 428–429.Google Scholar
Inglis, W. G. and Dlaz-Ungria, C, 1903.—“Sobre el genero Labiduris (Ascaridata: Kathlaniidae) con una discusion sobre el desarrollo dc la cabeza”. Boln. Soc. venez. Cienc. nat., 25, 120–154.Google Scholar
Inglis, W. G., AND Ogden, C. G., 1905.—“Chabaudus chabaudi gen. et sp. nov. (Nematoda: Seuratoidea) from a fresh-water fish in Sierra Leone”. Revue Zool. Bot. afr., 71, 171–176.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1940.—“Some nematodes parasitic in Australian fresh-water fish”. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 64, 340–352.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1941.—“Some nematodes from Australian birds of prey”. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 65, 30–35.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1941a.—”Some nematode parasites of Australian birds.” Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W., 66, 250–256.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1941b.—”Some parasitic nematodes in the collection of the Australian Museum”. Rec. Aust. Mus., 21, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, E. M., 1933.—“Ucber die parasitischen Wurmer der Fische des Bail-kalsees”. Trav. Stat, limnol. Lake Baikal, 4, 5–99 (in Russian with German summary).Google Scholar
Llnstow, O. Von, 1898.—“Nemathelminthcn gcsammelt von Herrn Prof. Dr. E. Dahl in Bismarck-Archipcl”. Arch. Naturg., 63, 281–291.Google Scholar
Mawson, P. M., 1960.—“Seuratinema Johnston et Mawson, 1941, synonymc de Skrjabinema Gnédina 1933”. Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 35, 430–431.Google Scholar
Mawson, P. M. 1960a.—”Nematodes belonging to the Trichostrongylidac, Subulu-ridae, Rhabdiasidae and Trichuridae from bandicoots”. Aust. J. Zool., 8, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osche, G., 1958.—“Beiträge zur Morphologic, Ökologie und Phylogenie der Ascaridoidea (Nematoda), parellelcn in der Evolution von Parasit und Wirt”. Z. ParasitKde, 18, 479–572.Google Scholar
Sandground, J. H., 1937.—“Three new parasitic nematodes from the Belgian Congo”. Revue ZooL BoL afr., 29 230–236.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1915.—“Sur un nouvel Ophiostomum parasite du Gundi”. C.v. Séance Soc. Biol., 77, 20–22.Google Scholar
Sypliaxova, O. M., 1930.—“Sur un nouveau nématode des reptiles: Skrjabinelazia taurica n.gen., n. sp. Annls Parasit. hunt, comp., 8, 615–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1927.—“Uma nova Capillaria parasita de peixes de agua doce, Capillaria sentinosa n. sp.” Bol. Biol. Fac. Med. S. Paulo, 10, 215–217.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., Artigas, P. and Pereira, C, 1928.—“Fauna helmintologica dos peixes de agua doce do Brasil”. Arch. Inst. Biol. Defesa Agric. e. Anim., 1, 5–68.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. and Magath, T. B., 1916.—“Notes on some nematodes from freshwater fishes”. J. Parasit., 3, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S” 1961.—Systema Helminihum. Vol. III. The Nematodes of Vertebrates. London, Interscience.Google Scholar
Yorke, W. and Maplestone, P. A., 1926.—The nematode parasites of vertebrates. London.Google Scholar