Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:01:47.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The parasite community of the nase Chondrostoma nasus (L. 1758) from Austrian rivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2010

F. Jirsa ,
R. Konecny ,
C. Frank  and
B. Sures
F. Jirsa*
Affiliation:
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währingerstrasse 42, 1090Vienna, Austria Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria
R. Konecny
Affiliation:
Department of Freshwater Ecology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090Vienna, Austria
C. Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria
B. Sures
Affiliation:
Applied Zoology/Hydrobiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141Essen, Germany
*
*Fax: +43 1 4277 526 20 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between April 2003 and November 2006 a total of 191 individuals of the predominantly herbivorous fish species nase Chondrostoma nasus (L. 1758) were examined for parasites from six river sites in Austria. The following parasite taxa were recovered – Ciliata: Trichodina sp., Chilodonella piscicola, Ichthyophthirius multifiliis; Myxozoa: Myxobolus muelleri (cysts) and Myxobolus sp. (cysts); Monogenea: Dactylogyrus vistulae, D. chondrostomi and Dactylogyrus spp., Gyrodactylus sp., Diplozoon paradoxum; Digenea: Diplostomum spathaceum (larv.) and Tylodelphis clavata (larv.); Cestoda: Caryophyllaeus laticeps; Acanthocephala: Pomphorhynchus laevis; Bivalvia: Unio sp. (Glochidia); Crustacea: Lamproglena pulchella; Hirudinea: Piscicola geometra. The only taxa occurring at all sample sites were Dactylogyrus spp., which was also the dominant taxon at most sites, and Myxobolus muelleri, both from the gills of the fish. This is the first record of the parasite community of the nase in Austria.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 255 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amlacher, E. (1992) Taschenbuch der Fischkrankheiten für Ichthyopathologen, Veterinärmediziner und Biologen. Jena, Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.M. (1974) Population dynamics of the cestode Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) in bream (Abramis brama, L.). Journal of Animal Ecology 43, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, E. (2001) Growth performance, mortality and habitat selection of rheophilic fish species, Chondrostoma nasus (Linne 1758), in a newly restored riverine area. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
BMLFUW, (2003) Wassergüte in Österreich, Jahresbericht 2002. Wien, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft.Google Scholar
BMLFUW, (2008) Leitfaden zur typspezifischen Bewertung der allgemein physikalisch-chemischen Parameter in Fließgewässern gemäß WRRL. Wien, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft – Sektion VII.Google Scholar
BMFLUW/WWK, (2008) Ämter der Landesregierungen: Erhebung der Wassergüte in Österreich gemäß Hydrographiegesetz. BGBl. Nr. 252/90, i.d.g.FBundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft/Sektion VII Wasserwirtschaftliche Planung.Google Scholar
Bush, A.O., Laferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. & Shostak, A.W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.A. (1982) Effect of copper and zinc upon the survival and infectivity of Echinoparyphium recurvatum cercariae. Parasitology 85, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evlanov, I.A. & Kolokolnikova, S.E. (1991) Population ecology of the cestode Caroyphyllaeus laticeps (Cestoda, Caryophyllidae) in the bream population. Zoologicesky Journal 70, 12–16(in Russian).Google Scholar
Gerstmeier, R. & Roming, T. (2003) Die Süßwasserfische Europas. Stuttgart, Frankh-Kosmos Verlag.Google Scholar
Haunschmid, R., Wolfram, G., Spindler, T., Honsig-Erlenburg, W., Wimmer, R., Jagsch, A., Kainz, E., Hehenwarter, K., Wagner, B., Konecny, R., Riedmüller, R., Ibel, G., Sasano, B. & Schotzko, N. (2006) Erstellung einer fischbasierten Typologie sowie einer Bewertungsmethode des fischökologischen Zustandes gemäß EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Vol. 23, Wien, Schriftenreihe des Bundesamtes für Wasserwirtschaft.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A.D., Bunnell, J.F. & Sukhdeo, M.V.K. (2007) Composition and diversity patterns in metazoan parasite communities and anthropogenic disturbance in stream ecosystems. Parasitology 134, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirzinger, V. (2001) The importance of inshore areas for adult fish assemblages in the main channel of a free flowing section of a large river (Danube, Austria). Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Holzer, A. & Schachner, O. (2002) Myxobolus cycloides on the swimbladder of chub Leusciscus cephalus: a controlled, host-specific localisation. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 49, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoole, D., Bucke, D., Burgess, P. & Wellby, I. (2001) Diseases of carp and other cyprinid fishes. 264 pp. Oxford, Fishing New Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, P.J., Dobson, A.P. & Lafferty, K.D. (2006) Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirsa, F. (2004) Die proto- und metazoische Parasitenfauna bei Chondrostoma nasus L. und Leuciscus cephalus L. zweier Habitate in Niederösterreich und die physikalisch-chemische Analyse der Gewässer. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Jirsa, F., Leodolter-Dvorak, M., Krachler, R. & Frank, C. (2008a) Heavy metals in the nase Chondrostoma nasus (L. 1758) and its intestinal parasite Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas 1781) from Austrian rivers: bioindicative aspects. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 55, 619–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jirsa, F., Konecny, R. & Frank, C. (2008b) The occurrence of Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas 1781) in the nase Chondrostoma nasus (L. 1758) from Austrian rivers: possible anthropogenic factors. Journal of Helminthology 82, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungwirth, M., Schmutz, S. & Zitek, A. (2001) Fischökologische IST-Bestandsaufnahme an Pielach, Melk und Mank. Wien, Universität für Bodenkultur.Google Scholar
Kanaev, A.I. (1956) On the treatment of carp infected by Caryophyllaeus. Rybnoe Khosaitsvo 4, 50–52(in Russian).Google Scholar
Karanis, P. & Taraschewski, H. (1993) Host–parasites interface of Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Eucestoda: Caryophyllidae) in three species of fish. Journal of Fish Diseases 16, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keckeis, H. (2001) Reproduction and early life history of the rheophilic cyprinid Chondrostoma nasus (L.). Professional dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.R., Bush, A.O. & Aho, J.M. (1986) Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 93, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerschbaumer, G., Prochinig, U., Gross, T., Hradetzky, R. & Konar, M. (2002) Aquatische Fauna und Flora. pp. 3–136in Prochinig, U. (Ed.) Ökosystem Flusskraftwerk Rosegg- St. Jakob, Stand und Zukunftsperspektiven der Bewirtschaftung. Schriftenreihe Forschung im Verbund 79. Wien, Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschaft Aktiengesellschaft.Google Scholar
Laimgruber, S., Schludermann, C., Konecny, R. & Chovanec, A. (2005) Helminth community of the barbel Barbus barbus from large river systems in Austria. Journal of Helminthology 79, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, E. (1993) Gewässerbetreuungskonzept Lafnitz. Wien, Amt der Burgenländischen Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Lawrynowicz, Z. (1968) Intestinal parasites of nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus 1758) from the Bug and Krzna River. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne T XIV, 461–462(in Polish).Google Scholar
Lom, J. & Dykova, I. (1992) Protozoan parasites of fishes. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Macko, J.K., Ryšavy, B., Špakulova, M. & Kralova, I. (1993) Synopsis of cestodes in Slovakia I. Cestodaria, Cestoidea: Caryophyllidea, Spathebothriidea, Pseudophyllidea, Proteocephalidea. Helminthologia 30, 85–91.Google Scholar
Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. London, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, D.J. (2005) Parasites of the superorganism: Are they indicators of ecosystem health? International Journal of Parasitology 35, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, R. (2005) Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet and ichthyophthiriosis in freshwater teleosts. Advances in Parasitology 59, 159–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molnar, K., Marton, Sz., Eszterbauer, E. & Szekely, Cs. (2006) Comparative morphological and molecular studies on Myxobolus spp. infecting chub from the River Danube, Hungary, and description of M. muellericus sp.n. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 73, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nachev, M. & Sures, B. (2009) The endohelminth fauna of barbel (Barbus barbus) correlates with water quality of the Danube River in Bulgaria. Parasitology 136, 545–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Park Donau Auen (2007) Available athttp://www.donauauen.at/html/english/index.html (accessed 10 October 2007).Google Scholar
Ratschan, C. (2003) Effekte von saisonalen Umweltfaktoren auf Überlebensraten und Mobilität von Flußfischen. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Reckendorfer, W., Keckeis, H., Tiitu, G., Winkler, G., Zornig, H. & Schiemer, F. (2001) Diet shift in 0+nase Chondrostoma nasus: size-specific differences and the effect of food availability. Large Rivers 12 2-4. Archives of Hydrobiology Suppl 135/2-4, 425–440.Google Scholar
Schäperclaus, W. (1954) Fischkrankheiten. 3rd edn.708 pp. Berlin, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schäperclaus, W. (1990) Fischkrankheiten. 5th edn.1089 pp. Berlin, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schiemer, F. (1988) Gefährdete Cypriniden – Indikator für die ökologische Intaktheit von Flusssystemen. Natur und Landschaft 63, 370–373.Google Scholar
Schiemer, F. & Spindler, T. (1989) Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 4, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schludermann, C., Konecny, R., Laimgruber, S., Lewis, J.W., Schiemer, F., Chovanec, A. & Sures, B. (2003) Fish macroparasites as indicators of heavy metal pollution in river sites in Austria. Parasitology 126, 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulman, S.S. (Ed.) (1984) Parasitic protozoa. Vol. 1 in Bauer O.N. (Ed.) Keys to the fauna of the USSR, Vol. 140: Key to the parasites of freshwater fauna of the USSR (in Russian). 428 pp. Leningrad, Nauka.Google Scholar
Sures, B. (2004) Environmental parasitology: relevancy of parasites in monitoring environmental pollution. Trends in Parasitology 20, 170–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B., Knopf, K., Würtz, J. & Hirt, J. (1999) Richness and diversity of parasite communities in European eels Anguilla anguilla of the River Rhine, Germany, with special reference to helminth parasites. Parasitology 119, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabernig, C. (2003) Entwicklung eines GIS-basierenden Fischverbreitungsatlasses österreichischer Fließgewässer anhand der nationalen Datenbank ‘HaFiDat’. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.Google Scholar
Valtonen, E.T., Holmes, J.C. & Koskivaara, M. (1997) Eutrophication, pollution, and fragmentation: effects on parasite communities in roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) in four lakes in central Finland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 572–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal-Martinez, V.M., Pech, D., Sures, B., Purucker, S.T. & Poulin, R. (2010) Can parasites really reveal environmental impact? Trends in Parasitology 26, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woschitz, G. (1996) Die Fisch-Fauna der Lafnitz. Naturschutzbrief 169, Landesgruppe Steiermark des österreichischen Naturschutzbundes, Graz.Google Scholar
Xu, D.H. & Klesius, P.H. (2003) Protective effect of cutaneous antibody produced by channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque), immune to Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Fouquet) on cohabited non-immune catfish. Journal of Fish Diseases 26, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zander, C.D. (2007) Parasite diversity of sticklebacks from the Baltic Sea. Parasitology Research 100, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zitek, A., Schmutz, S. & Jungwirth, M. (2004) Fischökologisches Monitoring an den Flüssen Pielach, Melk und Mank im Rahmen des EU-LIFE Projektes ‘Lebensraum Donauhuchen’. Endbericht, Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, St. Pölten.Google Scholar
Žitňan, R. (1960) Knowledge on the helminthological investigation of fishes in East Slovakia. Sbornik Vychodoslovenskeho Muzea, Kosice I A, 135–141(in Czech).Google Scholar
Žitňan, R. (1965) Results of the helminthological investigation of the fishes from the Latorica river. Sbornik Vychodoslovenskeho Muzea, Kosice VI B, 35–44(in Czech).Google Scholar
Žitňan, R. (1966) Cestoidea and Trematoidea of fish from the Tisza Lowland. Biologia 21, 763–770(in Czech).Google Scholar