Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:51:45.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Onchocerciasis in British cattle: a study of Onchocerca gutturosa and O. lienalis in North Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

A.J. Trees ,
P.J. McCall  and
S.J. Crozier
A.J. Trees
Affiliation:
Department of veterinary Parasitology, Liverpool school of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35 QA, England
P.J. McCall
Affiliation:
Department of veterinary Parasitology, Liverpool school of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35 QA, England
S.J. Crozier
Affiliation:
Department of veterinary Parasitology, Liverpool school of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35 QA, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Onchocerca gutturosa and O. lienalis inflections in British cattle were studied by examination of cattle post-mortem originating from North Wales and Cheshire (north west England). In 463 adult animals, the microfilarial (mf) prevalence was 28·5%. In 95·3% of the inflected animals, gravid worms could not be found at either the ligamentum nuchae or the gastro-splenic omentum. Dermal mf at the head were identified as O. gutturosa on the basis of their highly significant assocation with the presence of gravid O. gutturosa at the ligamentum nuchae, which were found in only 3·2% of cattle. Mfs were isolated from different skin sites and from adult worms and a minimum of 10 mfs from each isolate were examined for width and acid phosphatase (AP) staining pattern. The width of O. gutturosa dermal mf was <4 μm (4 isolations), narrower than of putative O. lienalis mf isolated from umbilical skin of cattle without evidence of O. gutturosa, which were in 20/22 isolations >4 μm wide. The dermal mf were also distinguished on the basis of different AP staining patterns which, for each species, correlated closely with that of hatched intrauterine mf from their respective adult female worms. Based on the criteria of morphology and AP staining patterns the mf species prevalences in the survey population were estimated as O. lienalis 24·1% and O. gutturosa 2·2%, with a further 2·2% of cattle inflected with both species. The results indicate that the predilection site of adult O. lienalis is not the gastro-splenic omentum. In North Wales, the distribution of the two species was different; O. lienalis was widely distributed in all cattle rearing areas both lowland and upland, whereas O. gutturosa was largely restricted to valleys close to major rivers.

Keywords

Onchocera gutturosaonchocerca lienaliscattleBritainprevalencedistribution
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 103 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bain, O., Petit, G. & Poulain, B. (1978) Validité des deux espeèces Onchocerca lienalis et O. gutturosa, chez les bovins. Annales de Parasitologie, 53, 421–430.Google Scholar
Barka, T. & Anderson, P. J. (1962) Histochemical methods for acid phosphatase using hexazonium pararosaniline as coupler, Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 10, 741–753.Google Scholar
Bianco, A. E., Ham, P. J., El sinnary, K. & Nelson, G. S. (1980) Large scale recovery of Onchocerca mocrofilariae from naturally inflected cattle and horses. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 74, 109.Google Scholar
Eberhard, M. L. (1979) Studies on the Onchocerca (Namatoda: Failarioidea) found in cattle in the United States. I. Systematics of O. gutturosa and O. lienalis with a description of O. Stilesi sp. n. Journal of Parasitology, 65, 379–388.Google Scholar
Eichler, D. A. (1973) Studies on Onchocerca gutturosa (Neumann, 1910) and its development in Simulium ornatum (Meigen, 1818). 4. Systematics of O. gutturosa. Journal of Helminthology, 47, 89–96.Google Scholar
Eichler, D. A. & Nelson, G. S. (1971) Studies on Onchocerca gutturosa (Neumann, 1910) and its development in Simulium ornatum (Meigen, 1818). I. Observations on O. gutturosa in cattle in South-East England. Journal of Helminthollogy, 45, 245–258.Google Scholar
El-Bihari, S. & Hussein, H. S. (1978) Onchocerca gutturosa (Neumann, 1910) in Sudanese cattle I. The mocrofilariae. Revue Elevage Médicine Vétérinaire Pays Tropique, 31, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fain, A., Herin, V. & Thienpont, D. (1955) Filariosés des bovidés au Ruanda-Urundi. III Etude parasitologique B) Failaries des genres Setaria et Onchocerca, et microfilaries sanguines et dermiques. Annales de la Societe Belge de Medecine Tropicale, 35, 555–583.Google Scholar
Flockhart, H. A. (1982) The identification of some Onchocerca spp. of cattle by isoenzyme analysis. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 33, 51–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Flockhart, H. A. & Bianco, A. E. (1985) Differentation of Onchocerca gutturosa and O. lienalis by analysis of their GPI isoenzymes. Journal of Helminthology, 59, 187–189.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. V. (1952) Comparative morphology of the skin-inhabiting microfilariae of man, cattle and equines in Guatemala. Amercian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1, 250–261.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1921) Onchocerciasis of Queensland cattle. Transactions of the Royal Sciety of South Australia, 45, 231–247.Google Scholar
Mccall, P. J. & Trees, A. J. (1984) Preliminary field studies on potential vectors of bovine onchocerciasis in North Wales. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 78, 274.Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1979) Identification of Onchocerca. In: Problems in the Identification of Parasites and their Vectors (editors, Taylor, A. E. R. and Muller, R.). Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, Vol. 17 pp. 175–206. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Omar, M. S. (1978) Histochemical enzyme-staining patterns of Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae and their occurrence in different onchocerciasis areas. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 29, 462–472.Google ScholarPubMed
Omar, M. S., Denke, A. M. & Raybould, J. N. (1979) The development of Onchocerca ochengi (Nematoda: Filaroidea) to the infective stage in Simulium damnosum s.1. with a note on the histochemical staining of the parasite. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 30, 157–162.Google Scholar
Schillhorn Van Veen, T. W. & Blotkamp, J. (1978) Histochemical differentiation of microfilariae of Dipetalonema, Dirofilaria, Onchocerca and Setaria spp. of man and domestic animals in the Zaria area (Nigeria). Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 29, 33–35.Google Scholar
Scholtens, R. G., Adams, S. R. & Broderson, J. R. (1977) Evidence of onchocerciasis in Georgia cattle: prevalence at slaughter. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 38, 1093–1097.Google Scholar
Steward, J. S. (1937) The occurrrence of Onchocerca gutturosa Neumann in cattle in England, with and account of its life history and development in Simulium ornatum Mg. Parasitology, 29, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataratnam, A. & Kershaw, W. E. (1961) Distribution of the microfilariae of Onchocerca in the skin of cattle. Annales de la Sociéte Belge de Medécine Tropicale, 41, 323–328.Google ScholarPubMed
Webber, W. A. F., Crisp, G., Wright, A. I. & Williams, P. (1957) Records of Onchocerca found at postmortem examination of welsh cattle. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 51, 295.Google Scholar
Yarzábal, L., petralanda, I., Arango, M., Lobo, L. & Botto, C. (1983) Acid phosphatase patterns in microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus s.1. from the Upper Orinoco basin, Venezuela. Tropenmedizin und Parasitilogie, 34, 109–112.Google Scholar