Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:56:29.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Two Filarial Parasites from Dogs in Ceylon, Brugia ceylonensis n.sp. and Dipetalonema sp.inq.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

L. G. Jayewardene
L. G. Jayewardene
Affiliation:
Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Ceylon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new species of Brugia, from the lymphatic glands of dogs in Ceylon, is described. It is closely related to B. patei (Buckley, Nelson and Heisch, 1958).

Also from dogs in Ceylon, a species of Dipetalonema was recovered whose relationship with other species of Dipetalonema is discussed. In the absence of conclusive evidence that it is a distinct species it is for the present regarded as a species inquirenda.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 1962 , pp. 269 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azevedo, J. Fraga De, 1943.—“On the presence of Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870) among dogs in Portugal: contribution to the study of its morphology.” Ann. Inst. Med. trop., Lisboa, 1, 105–114.Google Scholar
Buckley, J.J.C, 1958.—“A new genus Brugia, for Wuchereria spp. of the malayi group.” Proc. of the Oth Int. Congresses on trop. Med. and Malaria, 2, 385–391.Google Scholar
Buckley, J.J.C, 1960.—“On Brugia gen. nov. for Wuchereria spp. of the malayi group.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 54, 75–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, J.J.C., Edeson, J.F.B., 1956.—“On the adult morphology of Wuchereria sp. (malayi ?) from a monkey (Macaca irus) and from cats in Malaya, and on Wuchereria pahangi n.sp. from a dog and a cat.” J. Helminth., 30, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, J.J.C., Nelson, G.S. and Heisch, R.B., 1958.—“On Wuchereria patei n.sp. from the lymphatics of cats, dogs and genet cats on Pate Island, Kenya.” J. Helminth., 32, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chabaud, A.G., 1952.—“Le genere Dipetalonema Diesing, 1861; essai de classification.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 27, 250–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dissanaike, A.S. and Paramananthan, D.C, 1961.—“On Brugia (Brugiella subgcn. nov.) buckleyi n.sp., from the heart and blood vessels of the Ceylon hare.” J. Helminth., 35, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, L.C., 1933.—“A comparative study of the anatomy of Microfilaria malayi Brug, 1927 and Microfilaria bancrofti Cobbold, 1877.” Chinese Med. J., 47, 1214–1240.Google Scholar
Korke, V.T., 1924.—“On a new microfilaria from the dog. Microfilaria lewisii (n.s.).” Indian J. Med. Res., 11, 1231–1238.Google Scholar
Noé, G.f 1907.—“La Filaria grassii n.sp. e la Filaria recondita Grassi. Nota preliminare.” R. C. Accad. Lincei, 16, 806–810.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Krishnaswami, A.K. and Raghavan, N.G.S., 1958.—“A new nricrofilaria in the dog.” Indian J. Matariol., 12, 89–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Webber, W.A.F., 1955.—“The filarial parasites of primates; a review. Dirofilaria and Dipetalonema.” Ann. trap. Med. Parasit., 49, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webber, W.A.F., Hawking, F.—“The filarial worms Dipetalonema digitatum and D. gracile in monkeys.” Parasitology. 45, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, L.S., 1959.—“On a filarial parasite, Deraiophoronema freitaslenti n.sp., from the giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla from British Guiana, and a proposed reclassification of Dipetalonema and related genera.” Parasitology, 47, 196–205.Google Scholar
Yorke, W. and Maplestone, P.A., 1926.—The Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar