Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:57:29.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the morphology of Mermithonema entomophilum n.g., n.sp., a nematode parasite of the fly, Sepsis cynipsea L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Extract

In the body cavity of a female specimen of the fly, Sepsis cynipsea L., (Diptera-Cyclorrhapha), caught at this Institute in August, 1930, the writer found eight adult nematode parasites; 3 females and 5 males. The fly was dissected in Ringer's solution in which the worms became actively motile when set free from the host. At the time of dissection it was seen that the fly's ovaries were in an undeveloped state and there is no doubt that this was due to the presence of the parasites within the body cavity. Beyond noting the fact that the worms seemed to be of a mermithid type they were not investigated further at the time but were fixed in hot 70% glycerine alcohol, to which a trace of Nile Blue sulphate solution was added, and were set aside. Although a good number of the flies were dissected during the month of-August no other example was found to be infected with this species of nematode and, as the worms have not been found again since 1930 in casual specimens of the fly captured and dissected here, it seems desirable to describe them since they appear to be new to science. Structurally they bear some resemblance both to Aproctonema entomophagum Keilin, 1917 and to Tetradonema plicans Cobb, 1919 but differ from these species in several anatomical features. Their systematic relationships are discussed in detail later on.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chitwood, B. G., 1935.—The nature of the “cell body” in Trichuris and “ stichosome ” of Agamermis. J. Parasit., 21 (3), 225. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, J. R., 1936.—Life history of Agamermis decaudata, a nematode parasite of grasshoppers and other insects. J. agric. Res., 52 (3), 161198. (W.L. 10965.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1919.—Tetradonema plicans nov. gen. et spec, representing a new family Tetradonematidae as now found parasitic in the midge-insect Sciara coprophila Lintner. J. Parasit.., 5 (4) 176185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungerford, H. B., 1919.—Biological notes on Tetradonema plicans Cobb, a nematode parasite of Sciara coprophila I.intner. Sciara coprophila Lintner. J. Parasit., 5 (4), 186192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D., 1917.—Sur un Nématode nouveau, Aproctonema entouiopliagim n. g., n. sp., parasite d'une larve d'un Diptère. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 165, 399401. (W.L. 6628.)Google Scholar
Keilin, D., & Robinson, V. C., 1933.—On the morphology and life history of Aproctonema enlomophagum Keilin, a nematode parasite in the larvae of Sciara pullula Winn. (Diptera-Nematocera) Parasitology, 25 (3), 285295. (W.L. 16035)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, G., 1933.—Some morphological and physiological characters of the Mermithids in their relationship to parasitism. J. Parasit., 19 (3), 249250.Google Scholar