Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:29:28.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Development, in Culicoides furens Poey, of Filaria (= Mansonella) ozzardi Manson, 1897

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J. J. C. Buckley
J. J. C. Buckley
Affiliation:
(Wandsworth Research Scholar, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The life-cycle of Filaria ozzardi was studied in St. Vincent, B.W.I.

2. Culicoides furens Poey, a common sandfly in Calliaqua, where a 37·7% human infection was found, was used in the experimental infections.

3. Two hundred sand-flies, collected at Calliaqua, were given an infective feed of blood of F. ozzardi carriers. Of these flies, fifty-five, i.e., 27·5%, were subsequently found to be infected with developing stages of the parasite. The ingested microfilariae migrated within 24 hours to the thorax, where the entire morphological development takes place. In flies which were kept alive for seven or eight days, advanced stages were found in the thorax and head, and their emergence from the proboscis was induced by slight pressure on the head.

4. The development in the sandfly consists of a metamorphosis from the 1st stage or “sausage” larva to a 2nd stage larva during the first 3 to 4 days, and from this stage to a 3rd stage or infective larva on the fifth or sixth day. Two ecdyses occur during these metamorphoses, which are discussed in relation to the other human filarial parasites.

5. Five per cent. of C. furens caught at Calliaqua were found to be naturally infected with developing larvae, apparently F. ozzardi.

6. The possibility that C. paraensis, another species in Calliaqua, may also act as a vector, is not excluded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , March 1934 , pp. 99 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blacklock, D.B., 1926.—“The Development of Onchocerca volvulus in Simulium damnosum.” Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. xx, pp. 1–48. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C., 1933.—“A Note on the Development of Filaria ozzardi in Culicoides furens Poey.” J. Helm. xi (4), pp. 257–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1929.—“Observations on a Parasitological Tour of the Lesser Antilles.” Proc. R. Soc. Med. xx (2), pp. 933–941. (W.L. 16916.)Google Scholar
Connal, A. & Connal, S. L. M., 1922.—“The Development of Loa loa (Guyot) in Chrysops silacea (Austen) and in Chrysops dimidiata (van der Wulp).” Trans. Soc. Tro.p. Med. Hyg. Load. xvi, pp. 64–89. (W.L. 21671.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, N.C., 1928.—“A Study on the Transmission of Filaria in Northern Argentina.” Amer. J. Hyg. v pp. 457–466. (W.L. 600a.)Google Scholar
Fülleborn, F., 1908.—“Untersuchungen an menschlichen Filarien und deren Übertragung auf Stechmucken.” Arch. Schiffs.-u. Tropenhyg. x (9), pp. 353–388. (W.L. 1804.)Google Scholar
Low, G.C., 1902.—“Notes on Filaria demarquaii.” Brit. Med. J. i, pp. 196–197. (W.L. 3579.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, P., 1884.—“The Metamorphosis of Filaria sanguinis hominis in the Mosquito.” Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. ii, pp. 367–388. (W.L. 21543.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, N. A. D., 1927.—“Filaria perstans; its Development in Culicoides austeni.” Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. Lond. xx Pp. 371–396. (W.L. 21671.)Google Scholar
Vevers, G.M., 1924.—“Filaria Carriers and a List of Mosquitos.” Res. Mem. Lond. Sch. Trop. Med. v, No. 7, Addendum, pp. 119–122. (W.L. 18690.)Google Scholar
Vogel, H., 1927.—“Über Mikrofilaria demarquayi und die Mikrofllaria aus Tucuman in Argentinien.” Abh. hamburg. KolInst. xxv D. 2, pp. 573–584. (W.L. 43.)Google Scholar
Waterston, J., 1922.—“A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Biononlics of Sand-flies.” Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. xvi (1), pp. 69–92. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar