Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:56:30.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Hymenolepis sinensis n. sp. ; a New Cestode from the Grey Sand-Hamster (Cricetulus griseus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2010

J. N. Oldham
J. N. Oldham
Affiliation:
(Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The material upon which this study is based was obtained from a Grey Sand-Hamster (Cricetulus griseus) which died in captivity at the experimental farm of the Institute of Agricultural Parasitology. Several examples of two species of hamster were received from Dr. Hindle on his return from China, the specimen furnishing the worms being one of these. On death a post-mortem examination of the animal was made and the cestodes removed and preserved in dilute formalin. Some weeks subsequently the parasites were examined and found to differ from the descriptions of other species of Hymenolepis encountered in hamsters and the present study was entered upon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1929 , pp. 235 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

Acharius, E., 1782.—“Animadversioncs quædam physico-medicæ de Tania.” Diss., p. 25, Lundæ.Google Scholar
Batsch, A. J. G. C., 1786.—“Naturgeschichte der Bandwurmgattung überhaupt und ihrer Arten insbesondere, nach den neuern Beobachtungen in einem systemalischen Auszuge.” pp. 188–189. Halle.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1922.—“Observations on Certain Cestodes of Rats, with an Account of a New Species of Hymenolepis.” Parasitology, Vol. xiv, No. 1, pp. 1–8. (W.L. 16035.)Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1929.—“A Manual of Helminthology Medical and Veterinary,” pp. 102–110. London.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1891.—“Histoire zoologique et médicale des téniadés du genre Hymenalepis Wieuland.” Bibliothéque générale du Médicine, pp. 65–66. Paris.Google Scholar
Bose, L. A. G., 1827.—“Histoire Naturelle des Vers, contenant leur Description et leurs Mœurs.” Seconde Édition, T. I, p. 353. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G., 1791.—“Tableau encyclopédique el méthodique des trois règnes de la nature contenant l'Helminthologie, ou Les vers infusoires, Les vers intestins, Les vers mollusqucs, etc.” Vol. vii, pl. 43, figs. 15–17. Paris.Google Scholar
Cholodkovsky, N., 1912.—“Explanatory Catalogue of the Collection of Parasitic Worms in the Zoological Cabinet of the Imperial Military Academy of Medicine.” Part I, Cestodes (Cyclophyllidea), p. 49. Petrograd (in Russian).Google Scholar
Cholodkovsky, N., 1913.—“Cestodes nouveaux ou peu connus. Dcuxiéme série.” Annu. Mus. zool. Acad. St. Pétersb., T. xviii, No. 2, pp. 230–231. (W.L. 8168.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1879.—“Parasites : a treatise on the entozoa of man and animals, including some account of the ectozoa,” pp. 315–316. London.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1850.—“Systema helminthum.” Vol. I, p. 520. Vindobonæ.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire naturelle des helminths ou vers intestinaux,” p. 593. Paris.Google Scholar
Flower, S. S., 1929.—“List of the Vertebrated Animals exhibited in the Gardens of the Zoological Society of London, 1828–1927.” Vol. i, Mammals, pp. 189–190. London.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., 1924.—“Hymenolepis macracanthos (v. Linstow) Considerations sur le Genre Hymenolepis.” J. Parasit., Vol. xi, No. 1, pp. 33–43. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gmelin, J. F., 1790.—“Caroli à Linné … Systema naturœ, etc.” Vol. i, Pt. 6, p. 3069. Lipsiæ.Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E., 1782.—“Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer thierischer Körper,” pp. 357–359. Blankenburg.Google Scholar
v. Janicki, C., 1904.—“Zur Kenntnis einiger Säugetiercestoden.” Zool. Am., Bd. xxvii. No. 25, p. 780. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
v. Janicki, C., 1906.—“Studien an Säugetiercestoden.” Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. lxxx., Nos. 2 u. 3, pp. 546, 556–557. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Joyeux, Ch., and Kobozieff, N.-I, 1928.—“Recherches sur l'Hymenolepis microstoma (Dujardin, 1845).” Ann. Parasit., T. vi., No. 1, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., 1894.—“Studya helmintologiczne, I. (Helminthologische Studien, I).” Bull. int. Acad. Cracovie, Cl. d. sc. math, et nat. (9), p. 279. (W.L. 4346.)Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., 1895.—“Studya helmintologiczne. I.” Rotpr. Akad. Um., Vol. xxix, p. 357. (W.L. 19543.)Google Scholar
v. Linstow, O. F. B., 1878.—“Compendium der Helminthologie,” p. 20. Hannover.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. L., 1925.—“Studies on the Avian Species of the Cestode Family Hymenolepididæ.” Illinois Biol. Monog., Vol. x. No. 1, 125 pp. (W. L. 9822.)Google Scholar
v. Olfers, I. F. M., 1816.—“De vegetativis el animatis corporibus in corporibus animatis reperiundis commentarius,” p. 37. Berolini.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1809.—“Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis.” Vol. ii (1), p. 41. Amstelædami.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1810.— Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis, Vol. ii. (2), pp. 181–182.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—“Entozoorum synopsis cui acccdunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi,” p. 165. Berolini.Google Scholar
Schrank, F. v. P., 1792.—“Verzeichniss einiger noch unbeschriebener Eingeweidewürmer.” N. Abh. K. schwed. Akad. Wiss., Vol. xi, p. 37.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1803.—“Anleitung zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer,” pp. 348–349. Bamberg.Google Scholar