Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:35:44.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Ancylostoma paraduodenale, a New Species from Felines, Closely Related to A. duodenale.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

E. Biocca
E. Biocca
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, LondonSchool of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1911 Looss wrote as follows : “ Up to the present time Agchylostoma duodenale is known to occur with certainty only in Man. It is true that the older works and text-books state that it has also been found in various species of animals (some species of apes, the tiger, the dog, the horse, etc.). In opposition to these statements, attempts made on various occasions to infect adult dogs, cats, rabbits, guineapigs, rats, mice, etc., with the parasite yielded entirely negative results. Only with quite young dogs and cats (not more than three or four months old) was the infection partly successful. The results of all these attempts at artificial infection thus support the view that the older statements as to the natural occurrence of Agchylostoma duodenale in animals are founded on a confusion of this species with others …”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 25 , Issue 1-2 , June 1951 , pp. 11 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alessandrini, G.C, 1905—“Su di alcune uncinarie parassite dell'uomo e di altri vertebrati.“ Boll. Soc. zool. ital., 14, 23–48. (W.L. 3389.)Google Scholar
Biocca, E., 1951.—“On Ancylostoma braziliense (de Faria, 1910) and its Morphological Differentiation from A. ceylanicum (Looss, 1911). J. Helminth., 25 (1/2). 1–10 (W.L. 112246.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghe, Van Der L., 1936.—“On the occurrence of a species of Ancylostoma closely related to A. duodenale in an African Lemur.” J.Parasit., 22, 224–226. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubini, A., 1843.—“Nuovo verme intestinale umano (Agchylostoma duodenale) constituente un sesto genere dei nematoidei propii dell'uomo.” Ann. Univ. Med., Milano, 106, 5–13.Google Scholar
Ercolani, G.B., 1859.—Nuovi elementi teorico-pratici di medicina veterinaria. Bologna, 1–550.Google Scholar
Faria, G.DE, 1910.—“Contribution towards the classification of Brazilian Entozoa. III. Ancylostomum braziliense n.sp., parasite of cats and dogs.“ Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz. 2, 286–293. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedoelst, L., 1917.—“Nématodes parasites du Sciurus prevosti de Sumatra.” Rev. zool. Afr., 5 (2), 153–162. (W.L. 19323.)Google Scholar
Lane, C, 1913.—“Agchylostoma ceylanicum, a new human parasite.” Indian med. Gaz., 48, 217–218. (W.L. 9943.)Google ScholarPubMed
Lane, C, 1916.—“The genus Ancylostoma in India and Ceylon.” Indian J. med. Res., 4. 74–92. (W.L. 9940.)Google Scholar
Lane, C, 1922.—“Ancylostoma braziliense.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 16 (4), 347–352. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, Von O., 1906.—“Helminthes from the collection of the Colombo Museum.” Spolia zelan., 3, 163–188. (W.L. 20491.)Google Scholar
Looss, A., 1911.—“The Anatomy and Life History of Agchylostoma duodenale Dub.” Rec. Sch. Med. Cairo, 4, 209. (W.L. 17750.)Google Scholar
Michelbtti, E., 1929.—“Intorno ad una nuova specie di Anchylostoma.“ Ann. Med. nav. colon., 2 (5/6), 246–257. (W.L. 1002.)Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1861.—“II sottordine de§li acrofalli ordinato scientificamente secondo i risultamenti delle indagmi anatomiche ed embriogeniche.” Mem. R. 1st. veneto Sc, 9, 427–633. (W.L. 13507.)Google Scholar
Mönnig, H.O., 1931.—“On a new hookworm, Ancylostoma martinagliai, from a jackal.“ J.S. Afr. vet. med. Ass., 2 (2), 125–127. (W.L. 11554a.)Google Scholar
Monnig, H.O., 1938.—“Ancylostoma hescheleri, n.sp,, from the antbear, Orycteropys afer, with a note on a new variety of A. caninum.” Vjchr. naturf. Ges. Zurich. 83 (3), 1–5. (W.L. 22557.)Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., 1927.—“Description of Ancylostoma pluridentatum, a hookworm of carnivores, and a review of the genus Ancylostoma.” Proc. U.S. not.Mus., 72. 1. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solanet, E., 1911.—Agchylostoma conepati nova species. Parásito del Conepatus suffocans Azara, 1801. (Zorrino.) Buenos Aires, 1–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorke, W. and Maplestone, P.A., 1926.—The Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. London.Google Scholar