Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T04:27:10.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Occurrence of Contracaecum bancrofti larvae in fish in the Murray–Darling Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2018

S. Shamsi Open the ORCID record for S. Shamsi [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Stoddart ,
L. Smales  and
S. Wassens
S. Shamsi*
Affiliation:
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
A. Stoddart
Affiliation:
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
L. Smales
Affiliation:
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, Australia
S. Wassens
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: S. Shamsi, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a paucity of information on the diversity and occurrence of freshwater fish parasites in Australia. This study investigates the distribution and occurrence of a parasitic nematode of the genus Contracaecum in freshwater fish from south-eastern Australia. Fish (n = 508) belonging to nine species and eight families were collected from eight wetlands associated with the Murrumbidgee River floodplain in the southern Murray–Darling Basin and subjected to laboratory examination. Third-stage nematode larvae were found in eight of the nine fish species. The exception was the fly-specked hardeyhead (Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum), although only one specimen of this species was examined. Nematode larvae were identified as Contracaecum bancrofti using a combined morphological and molecular approach. The parasite was most prevalent in weather loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus; 34.8%) and Australian smelt (Retropinna semoni; 21.4%), followed by carp (Cyprinus carpio; 9.5%), of which the former and latter are non-native species. Contracaecum prevalence differed between locations, with Two Bridges having the highest number of infected fish. This may be due to the higher number of suitable host species collected at these localities. Contracaecum spp. are parasites with low host specificity that have also been reported in Australian marine fish, humans and piscivorous birds. The high parasite prevalence in the two abundant non-native fish species in the region suggests that they act as a suitable host for this endemic parasite, resulting in the increase in the parasite population. It would be interesting to study host–parasite interactions in this area, especially if introduced fish populations declined dramatically in the attempt to eradicate them or control their population.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 93 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 574 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, RC (2000) Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Cannon, LRG (1977) Some larval ascaridoids from south-eastern Queensland marine fishes. International Journal for Parasitology 7, 233–243.Google Scholar
Christidis, L and Boles, W (2008) Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds. Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Hooper, JNA (1983) Parasites of estuarine and oceanic flathead fishes (family Platycephalidae) from northern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series 31(90), 1–69.Google Scholar
Horbowy, J, Podolska, M and Nadolna-Ałtyn, K (2016) Increasing occurrence of anisakid nematodes in the liver of cod (Gadus morhua) from the Baltic Sea: does infection affect the condition and mortality of fish? Fisheries Research 179, 98–103.Google Scholar
Hudson, PJ, Dobson, AP and Lafferty, KD (2006) Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 381–385.Google Scholar
Johnston, TH and Mawson, PM (1940) Some nematodes parasitic in Australian freshwater fish. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 64, 340–352.Google Scholar
Lymbery, AJ et al. (2002) Larvae of Contracaecum sp. among inshore fish species of southwestern Australia. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 51, 157–159.Google Scholar
Lymbery, AJ et al. (2014) Co-invaders: the effects of alien parasites on native hosts. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 3, 171–177.Google Scholar
Marohasy, J and Abbot, J (2015) Restoring native fish populations in Australia's Murray Darling Basin. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 10, 487–498.Google Scholar
Mawson, PM, Angel, M and Edmonds, SJ (1986) A checklist of helminths from Australian birds. Records of the South Australian Museum 19, 219–325.Google Scholar
Roy, HE and Handley, L-JL (2012) Networking: a community approach to invaders and their parasites. Functional Ecology 26, 1238–1248.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S and Butcher, AR (2011) First report of human anisakidosis in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 194, 199–200.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S and Suthar, J (2016) A revised method of examining fish for infection with zoonotic nematode larvae. International Journal of Food Microbiology 227, 13–16.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S, Gasser, RB and Beveridge, I (2011) Mutation scanning-coupled sequencing of nuclear ribosomal DNA spacers (as a taxonomic tool) for the specific identification of different Contracaecum (Nematoda: Anisakidae) larval types. Molecular and Cellular Probes 25, 13–18.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S, Turner, A and Wassens, S (2017) Description and genetic characterization of a new Contracaecum larval type (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from Australia. Journal of Helminthology 92, 216–222.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S et al. (2008) Contracaecum pyripapillatum n. sp. and a description of C. multipapillatum (von Drasche, 1882) from the Australian pelican, Pelecanus conspicillatus. Parasitology Research 103, 1031–1039.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S et al. (2009) Redescription and genetic characterization of selected Contracaecum spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from various hosts in Australia. Parasitology Research 104, 1507–1525.Google Scholar
Smales, LR and Weaver, HJ (2015) An annotated checklist of Acanthocephala from Australian fish. Zootaxa 3985, 349–374.Google Scholar
Smales, LR et al. (2018) A review of the Acanthocephala parasitising freshwater fishes in Australia. Parasitology 145, 249–259.Google Scholar
Thompson, JD et al. (1997) The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24, 4876–4882.Google Scholar
Zuo, S et al. (2018) Contracaecum osculatum and other anisakid nematodes in grey seals and cod in the Baltic Sea: molecular and ecological links. Journal of Helminthology 92, 81–89.Google Scholar