Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:27:37.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Specific Identity of Trichostrongylus longispicularis Gordon, 1933

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

R. I. Sommerville
R. I. Sommerville
Affiliation:
McMaster Laboratory, C.S.I.R.O., Sydney, N.S.W.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nematode Trichostrongylus longispicularis was described by Gordon (1933) from a single male recovered from a sheep in New South Wales. Gordon considered that the male of this species could be readily distinguished from the males of other species of the genus recorded from ruminants by an asymmetrical dorsal ray of the bursa and by the length and form of the spicules. The dorsal ray is described as being bifid, one bifurcation being simple and the other possessing secondary branches, one situated internally and the other externally. The slender spicules were 184·6 microns long, and terminated in fine sickle-shaped structures.

Andrews (1934 and 1935) recorded the species from cattle in the United States. In his first description (Andrews, 1934) he noted that his specimens agreed very closely with the description published by Gordon (1933), but he referred to hook-like projections on the spicules. However, he failed to find these projections in the specimen discussed in his record of 1935. As he made no reference to the dorsal ray of the bursa, it is presumed that this agreed with the description and figure published by Gordon (1933). T. longispicularis was subsequently reported by Roberts (1938 and 1939) from cattle in Queensland, but no comments were made on its morphology.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , June 1956 , pp. 21 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. S., 1934.— “Trichostrongylus longispicularis collected from cattle in United States.” Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash., 1, 13. (W.L. 16747a).Google Scholar
Andrews, J. S., 1935.—“A second report of the occurrence of Trichostrongylus longispicularis in cattle in the United States”. Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash., 2, 90.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL., 1933.—“Some ovine Trichostrongylids reported from Australia for the first time, with a description of Trichostrongylus longispicularis sp.nov., from a sheep”. Aust. Vet. J., 9, 34–37. (W.L. 2254).Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L., 1950.—“Trichoslrongylus leiperi sp.nov., a parasite of the Eland (Taurotragus oryz) in Northern Rhodesia.” J. Helminth., 24, 23–27. (W.L. 11224b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mönnig, H. O., 1933.—“Wild antelopes as carriers of nematode parasites of domestic ruminants. Part III”. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci., 1, 77–92. (W.L. 15681a).Google Scholar
Nagaty, H. F., 1932.—“The genus Trichostrongylus Looss, 1905”. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit., 26, 457–518. (W.L. 1063).Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1938.—“The gastro-intestinal helminths of cattle in Queensland: their distribution and pathogenic importance”. Proc. Roy. Soc. Qd., 50, 46–54. (W.L. 16903).Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1939.—“The occurrence and prevalence of gastro-intestinal helminths in apparently healthy cattle in Queensland, Australia”. J. Comp. Path., 52, 160–165. (W.L. 11136).Google Scholar