No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
No. 4. The Helminth parasites of Deer
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2009
Extract
In the course of searching for references to helminth infections in a species of deer, at the request of one of the Bureau's correspondents, it became apparent that the great majority of the helminths either were parasites of sheep and cattle also, or were closely related thereto. In view of the further fact that some deer are of considerable economic importance and are widely scattered over the surface of the earth, it was decided to extend the scope of the search so as to include all deer from which helminthic parasites have been recorded. This information has here been tabulated, with the addition of some necessary comments and a list of the relevant references.
- Type
- Imperial Bureau of Agricultural Parasitology: Notes and Memoranda
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931
References
Baylis, H. A., 1925.—“On the species of Gongylonema (Nematoda) parasitic in ruminants,” J. Comp. Path., xxxviii, (1), 46–55, 5 figs., 8 refs. (W.L. 11136.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., & Daubney, R., 1922.—“Report on the parasitic nematodes in the collection of the Zoological Survey of India,” Mem. Ind. Mus., vii, (4), 263–347, 75 figs. (W.L. 13401.)Google Scholar
Bederke, O., 1931.—“Kamel-und Renntierfleisch auf dem Sowjetmarkt,” Deutstierãrztl.Wschr., xxxix, (28), 438–439, 5 refs. (W.L. 7323.)Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. V., 1861.—“Mémoire sur les vers intestinaux,” C. R. Acad. Sri. Paris, Suppl., 376 pp., 27 p1. (W.L. 6628.)Google Scholar
Blair, W. R., 1903.—“Cysticerci in wild ruminants,” Rep. N. Y. Zool. Soc. (7th Annual Report for 1902), 137–144, 2 figs. (W.L. 1407.)Google Scholar
Blei, R., 1921.—“Drei neue Schafzestoden,” Zbl. Bakt., Abt. I, LXXXVII, (5) 365–387, 17 figs., 18 refs. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Brumpt, E., 1911.—“Les cerfs de la forêt de Chantilly sont décimés par les helminthes,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLII, 906–909. (W.L. 6628.)Google Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1927.—“Studies on three new genera and some little-known species of the nematode family Protostrongyliæ Leiper, 1926,” J. Helm., v (1), 1–24, 14 figs., 8 refs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M. 1931.—“On two new species of nematodes from the Scottish Red Deer,” J. Helm., ix, (4), 213–216, 6 figs., 1 ref.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, E. A., 1925.—“New nematodes from North American mammals,” J. Agric. Res., XXX, 677–681, 4 figs. (W.L. 10965.)Google Scholar
Christiansen, M., 1927.—“Muskelfinnen beim Reh (Cereus capreolus L).” Vidensk. Medd. naturh. Foren. Kjøb., LXXXIV, 251–279, 2 figs. I p1., 21 refs. (W.L. 22535.)Google Scholar
Dikmans, G., 1930.—“A new oxyurid from the deer,” Note presented to the Helminthological Society of Washington. ‘ Society Proceedings” in J. Parasit., XVII, (1), 52. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Dikmans, G., 1931A.—“Two new species of nematode worms of the genus Ostertagia from the Virginia deer, with a note on Ostertagia lyrata,” Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., LXXIX, (Art. 6), 1–6, 1 text-fig., 2 P 10 refs. (W.L. 16944.)Google Scholar
Dikmans, G., 1931B.—“Two new lungworms from North American ruminants and a note on the lungworms of sheep in the United States,” Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., LXXIX, (Art. 18), 1–4, 2 p1., 5 refs. (W.L. 16944.)Google Scholar
Dikmans, G., & Skinker, M. S., 1931.—“Cysticercus from the leg muscles of a mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus hemionus.” Note presented to the Helmintho logical Society of Washington. “Society Proceedings,” in J. Parasit., xvi (1), 55. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Ditlevsen, H., 1914.—“Conspectus faunæ Grcœn1andicæ Cestoder,” Medd. Grønland, xxiii, 1121–1140. (W.L. 12862.)Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—Histoire naturelle des Helminthes ou vers intestinaux, Paris, xvi + 654 + 15 pp., 12 p1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischoeder, F., 1901.—“Die Param phistomiden der Säugethiere,” Zool. Anz., xxiv, 367–375. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Fukui, T., 1929.—“Studies on Japanese amphistomatous parasites with revision of the group,” Jap J. Zool., ii, (1928–29), 219–351, 45 figs.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. G. A., 1866.—“Die im zoologischen Museum der Universität Halle aufgestellten Eingeweidewürmer nebst Beobachtungen über dieselben,” Z. ges. Naturw., xxviii, 253–278.Google Scholar
Grüner, S. A., 1910.—“Die Finnenkrankheit des Rennentieres,” Arkh. vet. Nauk., XL, 952. (W.L. 1999.)Google Scholar
Hadwen, , 1922.—Discussion in “Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington,” J. Parasit., ix, (1), 38–39. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1919.—“The adult tænioid cestodes of dogs and cats, and of related carnivores in North America,” Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., LV, 1–94. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kholodkovsky, N., 1902.—“Contributions à la connaissance des Ténias des ruminants,” Arch. Parasit. Paris, vi, 145–148, 1 fig. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. V., 1899.—“Nematoden aus der Berliner Zoologischen Sammlung,” Mitt, zool. Sammi. Mus. Naturk. Berl., i, (2), 3–28, 6 p 78 fIgs. (W.L. 14245.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. V., 1901.—“Entozoa des zoologischen Museums der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu St. Petersburg,” Bull. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersb., xv, (3), 271–292, 2 p1., 42 figs. (W.L. 10286.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. V., 1906.—“Neue und bekannte Helminthen,” Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst., xxiv, (1), [Reprint, 20 pp.], 1 p1., 18 figs. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A., 1923.—“A revision of the Amphistomata of Mammals,” Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit., xvii, 113–212, 32 figs., p1. 5–8, 28 refs. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molin, R., 1857.—“Notizie elmintologiche,” Atti. Ist. veneto, ii, 146–152, 216–223. (W.L. 2176.)Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1858.—“Versuch einer Monographie der Filarien,” SitzBer. Akad. Wiss. Wien., xxviii, (5), 365–461, p1. 1–2. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1860.—“Una monografia del genere Spiroptera,” SitzBer. A kad. Wiss. Wien., xxxviii, (28), 911–1005. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1861.—“II sottordine degli acrofalli…” Mem. Ist. veneto (1860), ix, 427–633., pl 25–33. (W.L. 13507.)Google Scholar
Moniez, R., 1879.—“Note sur le Tænia krabbei espèce nouvelle de Tænia; armé,” Bull. sci. Nord., 161–163.Google Scholar
Moniez, R. 1880.—“Essai monographique sur les cysticerques,” Trav. Inst. zool. Lille (Paris), iii, (1), 1–190., 3 pl.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1923.—“Présence d'Ascaris ovis chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus),” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., i 265–268., 5 figs., 7 refs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W., 1923.—“A reference list of the trematode parasites of British mammals,” Parasitology, xv, 236–252 (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J., 1924.—“On a collection of helminths from Dutch Guiana,” J. Helm., ii, (1), 15–40, 14 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railliet, A., 1886.—Eléments de zoologie médicale et agricole, Paris, xv + 1053 pp., 705 figs.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., & Henry, A., 1907.—Sur les variations des Strongles de l'appareil respiratoire des mammifères,” C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, LXIII, 751–753. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A., & Henry, A., 1909.—Footnote to a review in Rec. Méd. vét., LXXXVI, p. 128. (W.L. 17759.)Google Scholar
Rajewsky, S. A., 1929.—“Zwei bisher unbekannte Nematoden (Setarien) von Rangifer tarandus und von Cervus canadensis asialicus,” Z. InfektKr., xxxv, 40–52, 11 figs. (W.L. 23460.)Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H., 1911.—“The nematodes parasitic in the alimentary tract of cattle, sheep, and other ruminants.” Bull. U. S. Bur. Anim. ind., No. 127, 132 pp., 152 figs. (W.L. 5642.)Google Scholar
Romanovitch, M., 1915.—“Quelques helminthes du Renne (Tarandus rangifer),” C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, LXXVIII, 451–453. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1809.—Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis, Amstelædami, II, Pt. 1, 458 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi, Berolini, x + 811 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., 1927.—“A new parasitic nematode from the stomach of an unknown member of the Cervidæ,” J. Parasit., XIII, 25–28, 1 p1., 5 figs., 12 refs. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E., 1903.—“Some parasites from Ceylon,” Spolia zeylan., I (3), [Reprint, 11 pp.], 1 pl., 17 figs. (W.L. 20491.)Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., & Mizkewitsch, W., 1930.—“Skrjabinema tarandi nov. sp. eine neue Oxyuride des nordischen Renntieres,” Deuts. tierärzil. Wschr., XXXVIII, (12), 183–185., 4 figs. (W.L. 7323.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., 1906.—“Illustrated key to the cestode parasites of man,” Bull. U. S. Hyg. Lab., No. 25, 1–104, 166 figs. (W.L. 4295.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., & Goldberger, J., 1910.—“A study of the anatomy of Watsonius (n.g.) watsoni of man,” Bull. U. S. Hyg. Lab., No. 60, 264 pp., 205 figs. (W.L. 4295.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., & Hassall, A., 1893.—“A revision of the adult cestodes of cattle, sheep and allied animals,” Bull. U. S. Bur. Anim. Ind., No. 4, 134 pp., 16 p1., 75 refs. (W.L. 5642.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., & Hassall, A., 1901.—“Notes on Parasites, 55–57.” (57: “A new host for Strongylus contortus and Cysticercus tenuicollis ”),Circ. U. S. Bur. Anim. Ind., No. 34, pp. 1–4. (W.L. 6347.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., & Hassall, A., 1908.—“Index Catalogue of medical and veterinary zoology: Trematoda and trematode diseases,” Bull. U. S. Hyg. Lab., No. 37, 401 pp. (W.L. 4295.)Google Scholar
Stroh, G., 1930.—“Zur Distomatose beim Wild (Reh, Gemse, Hase, Rot- und Damwild),” Münch. tierärztl. Wschr., LXXXI, (31), 385–389., 1 pl., figs. (W.L. 14676.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1921.—“Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica basileira; xiii Ensaio monografico da familia Trichostrongy1id Leiper, 1909,” Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz.,, x (1), 5–135., 56 p1. (In French: “Translations,” pp. 3–82.) (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, F., 1925.—“On a nematode of the genus Ostertagia,” J. Comp. Path., xxxviii, 38–41., 3 figs., 3 refs. (W.L. 11136.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedl, C., 1856.—“Über einige Nematoden,” SitzBer. Akad. Wiss. Wien. (Math. naturw. Cl.), xix, 122–134., 1 pl. figs. 1–18 (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Weidman, F. D., 1913.—“A study of metazoan parasites found in the Philadelphia zoological gardens,” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., LXV, 126–151., 11 tabs., p1. IV, 9 figs. (W.L. 16590.)Google Scholar
Yorke, W., & Maplestone, P. A., 1926.—“The nematode parasites of vertebrates, London, xi + 536 pp., 307 figs., 684 refs.Google Scholar