Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:48:01.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphometric and molecular analyses of Skrjabinolecithum pyriforme n. sp. (Digenea: Haploporidae) in mullet fish from the Primorsky Region, Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2016

V.V. Besprozvannykh ,
D.M. Atopkin ,
A.V. Ermolenko  and
A.Yu. Beloded
V.V. Besprozvannykh
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
D.M. Atopkin*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia
A.V. Ermolenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
A.Yu. Beloded
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
*
*Fax: +7 4232310193 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species of Skrjabinolecithum (Digenea: Waretrematinae), Skrjabinolecithum pyriforme n. sp., has been found in the intestines of Liza haematocheila and Mugil cephalus from the Primorsky Region, Russia. These worms differ from S. vitellosum and S. lobolecithum by the presence of two caeca, as do S. spasskii, S. indicum and S. bengalensis. These species differ morphologically from S. pyriforme n. sp. by a number of features, including body width, oral sucker, pharynx, eggs and ratio of length and width of the body. The most similar species to S. pyriforme n. sp. is Platydidymus flecterotestis (Zhukov, 1971) with some differences in maximal body length, testis and egg sizes. The results of molecular analysis confirmed that this new species belongs to Skrjabinolecithum on the basis of close relationships with S. spasskii-type species.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 91 , Issue 5 , September 2017 , pp. 625 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, M.J., Pulis, E.E., Cribb, T.H. & Overstreet, R.M. (2014) Erection of the haploporid genus Litosaccus n.g. and its phylogenetic relationship within the Haploporidae Nicoll, 1914. Systematic Parasitology 89, 185–194.Google Scholar
Andres, M.J., Curran, S.S., Fayton, T.J., Pulis, E.E. & Overstreet, R.M. (2015) An additional genus and two additional species of Forticulcitinae (Digenea: Haploporidae). Folia Parasitologica 62, 025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atopkin, D.M., Beloded, A.Yu., Ngo, H.D., Ha, N.V. & Tang, N.V. (2015) Molecular genetic characterization of the Far Eastern trematode Skrjabinolecithum spasskii Belous, 1954, (Digenea, Haploporidae), a parasite of mullets. Molecularnaya Biologya 49, 422–429 (in Russian).Google ScholarPubMed
Belous, E. (1954) Contribution to the systematics of trematode Family Haploporidae Nicoll, 1914. Trudy Hel'mintologitscheskoi laboratorii Akademija Nauk SSSR 7, 277–281 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Besprozvannykh, V.V., Atopkin, D.M., Ermolenko, A.V. & Nikitenko, A.Yu. (2015a) Restoration of the genus Parasaccocoelium Zhukov, 1971 (Digenea: Haploporidae) and a description of two new species from mugilid fish in the Far East of Russia. Journal of Helminthology 89, 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besprozvannykh, V.V., Atopkin, D.M., Ngo, H.D., Beloded, A.Yu., Ermolenko, A.V., Ha, N.V. & Tang, N.V. (2015b) Skrjabinolecithum spasskii Belous, 1954 (Digenea: Haploporidae), parasite of mullets (Mugilidae) from Primorsky Region (Far East of Russia) and Tonkin Bay (North Vietnam): morphology and molecular data. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 41, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasco-Costa, I., Balbuena, J.A., Kostadinova, A. & Olson, P.D. (2009) Interrelationships of the Haploporinae (Digenea: Haploporidae): a molecular test of the taxonomic framework based on morphology. Parasitology International 58, 263–269.Google Scholar
Curran, S.S., Tkach, V.V. & Overstreet, R.M. (2006) A review of Polylekithum Arnold, 1934 and its familial affinities using morphological and molecular data, with description of Polylekithum catahoulensis sp. nov. Acta Parasitologica 51, 238–248.Google Scholar
Darriba, D., Taboada, G.L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012) jModeltest2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9, 772.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J.P. (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 2310–2314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luton, K., Walker, D. & Blair, D. (1992) Comparisons of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers from two congeneric species of flukes (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 56, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madhavi, R. (1979) Digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Waltair Coast, Bay of Bengal. Families Haplosplanchnidae and Haploporidae. Rivista di Parassitologia 40, 237–248.Google Scholar
Overstreet, R. & Curran, S. (2005) Family Haploporidae Nicoll, 1914. pp. 129–165 in Gibson, D.I., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (Eds) Keys to the Trematoda, vol. 2. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Pulis, E. & Overstreet, R. (2013) Review of haploporid (Trematoda) genera with ornate muscularisation in the region of the oral sucker, including four new species and a new genus. Systematic Parasitology 84, 167–191.Google Scholar
Pulis, E., Fayton, T., Curran, S. & Overstreet, R. (2013) A new species of Intromugil (Digenea: Haploporidae) and redescription of Intromugil mugilicolus . Journal of Parasitology 99, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 2725–2729.Google Scholar
Tavare, S. (1986) Some probablistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 17, 57–86.Google Scholar
Tkach, V.V., Littlewood, D.T.J., Olson, P.D., Kinsella, J.M. & Swiderski, Z. (2003) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Ward, 1901 (Trematoda: Digenea). Systematic Parasitology 56, 1–15.Google Scholar
Truett, G.E. (2006) Preparation of genomic DNA from animal tissues. pp. 33–46 in Kieleczawa, J. (Ed.) The DNA book: Protocols and procedures for the modern molecular biology. Sudbury, Massachusetts, Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
Yiu, S., Peng, W. & Liu, S. (2005) Carassotrema flecterotestis (Zhukov, 1917) comb. nov. and observation of its miracidial development in vitro. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait 24, 97–103 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhukov, E. (1971) New representatives of the trematodes from marine and freshwater fishes in Japan Sea and Yellow Sea basins. Parasitologya 5, 155–161 (in Russian).Google Scholar