Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:34:16.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological comparison and identification of metacercariae in the ‘pygmaeus’ group of microphallids, parasites of seabirds in western palaearctic regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

D.H. Saville ,
K.V. Galaktionov ,
S.W.B. Irwin  and
I.I. Malkova
D.H. Saville
Affiliation:
School of Applied Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, County Antrim, Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB:
K.V. Galaktionov
Affiliation:
Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, Research Academy of Sciences Kola Scientific Centre, 17 Vladimirskaya Street, 18301, Murmansk, Russia
S.W.B. Irwin*
Affiliation:
School of Applied Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, County Antrim, Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB:
I.I. Malkova
Affiliation:
Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, Research Academy of Sciences Kola Scientific Centre, 17 Vladimirskaya Street, 18301, Murmansk, Russia
*
*Author for correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study compares the metacercariae of a ‘pygmaeus’ microphallid discovered in Littorina saxatilis from the coast of Northern Ireland with the metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes and M. pygmaeus from the same species of gastropod mollusc from Arctic Russia. Light and scanning electron microscopy were used to provide morphometric and surface details for descriptions of the organisms concerned. Comparison and statistical analysis of the results established that the species from Northern Ireland was M. piriformes and not M. pygmaeus as had previously been assumed. It dearly indicates the need for critical assessment of the accuracy of literature dealing with the occurrence of ‘M. pygmaeus’ in both intermediate and final hosts.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 167 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belopolskaya, M.M. (1949) Life cycle of Spelotrema pygmaeus. Doklady Akademii Nauk USSR 66, 133–135. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Belopolskaya, M.M. (1952) Trematode genitalia of Microphallidae Travassos, 1920. Trematoda Zhivotnykht, USSR 4, 618–756. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Ching, H.L. (1961) Three trematodes from the harlequin duck. Canadian Journal of Zoology 39, 373–376.Google Scholar
Deblock, S. (1971) Contribution ` l'étude des Microphallidae Travassos, 1920 (Trematoda). XXIV. Tentative de Phylogénie et de taxonomie. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 3 éme Série, Zoologie 7, 353–468. [In French]Google Scholar
Galaktionov, K.V. (1980) Four types of metacercarial species in molluscs, Littorina saxatilis and L. obtusata from the Barents and White Seas. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta Ser. 3, 21–28. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Galaktionov, K.V. (1983) Description species Microphallus pygmaeus (Levinsen, 1881) nee Odhner, 1905 & M. piriformes (Odhner, 1905) nom.nov. (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta Ser. 15, 20–30. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Galaktionov, K.V. (1984) Microphallidae group “pygmaeus”. II. Microphallus triangulatus sp. nov., (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta Ser. 3, 5–11. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Galaktionov, K.V. (1996) Impact of seabird helminths on host populations and coastal ecosystems. Bulletin of the Scandinavian Society for Parasitology 6, 50–64.Google Scholar
Irwin, S.W.B. & Saville, D.H. (1988) Cultivation and development of Microphallus pygmaeus (Trematoda: Microphallidae) in fertile chick eggs. Parasitology Research 74, 396–398.Google Scholar
Irwin, S.W.B., McKerr, G., Judge, B.C. & Moran, I. (1984) Studies on metacercarial excystment in Himasthla leptosoma (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) and newly excysted metacercariae. International Journal for Parasitology 14, 415–421.Google Scholar
James, B.L. (1964) The life cycle of Parvatrema homoeotecnum sp. nov. (Trematoda: Digenea) and a review of the family Gymnophallidae Morozov, 1955. Parasitology 54, 1–41.Google Scholar
James, B.L. (1967) The Digenea of the intertidal prosobranch, Littorina saxatilis (Olivi). Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionforschung 7, 273–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, B.L. (1968) Studies on the life-cycle of Microphallus pygmaeus (Levinsen, 1881) (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Journal of Natural History 2, 155–172.Google Scholar
Kulachkova, V.G. (1960) Death of the common eider ducklings and the reasons determining it. Proceedings of the Kandalaksha Nature Reserve 3, 91–106. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Kulachkova, V.G. (1979) Helminthes as a cause of common eider's death in the top of Kandalaksha Bay. pp. 119–125 in Ecology and morphology of eiders in the USSR. Moscow, Nauka Press. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Levinsen, G.M.R. (1881) Bidrag hi Kundskab om Gronlands Trematodfauna. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 52–84. [In Danish]Google Scholar
Lauckner, G. (1985) Diseases of Aves (marine birds). pp. 627–643in Kinne, O. (Ed.) Diseases of marine animals, Vol. IV, Part 2. Hamburg, Biologishe Ansatalt Helgoland.Google Scholar
Martorelli, S.R. & Ivanov, V.A. (1996) Host-induced and geographical variation in Levinseniella cruzi Travassos, 1920 (Digenea: Microphallidae). Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 63, 130–135.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1905) Die Trematoden des arkrischen gebietes. in Romer u. Schaudinn, Fauna Arctica 4, 192–372. [In German]Google Scholar
Persson, L., Borg, K. & Falt, H. (1974) On the occurrence of endoparasites in eider ducks in Sweden. Viltrevy (Swedish Wildlife) 9, 1–24.Google Scholar
Rice, W.R. (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skorping, A. (1996) Why should marine and coastal bird ecologists bother about parasites? Bulletin of the Scandinavian Society for Parasitology 6, 98–102.Google Scholar