Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:40:49.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hymenolepis citelli, H. diminuta and H. microstoma: immunoglobulin-containing cells in the lamina propria of the mouse gut during primary and secondary infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Sidi T. O. Alghali
Affiliation:
M. R. C. Experimental Parasitology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, England

Abstract

The indirect immunofluorescent technique was used to determine the occurrence of IgA, IgM and IgG1 immunoglobulin-containing cells in local intestinal mucosal immune responses to Hymenolepis citelli, H. diminuta and H. microstoma infections in mice. In the intestinal lamina propria of H. citelli and H. diminuta infected mice there was no increase in the mean numbers of immunoglobulin-containing cells when compared with uninfected control mice, but there was in H. microstoma infected mice. The numbers of IgG1 – positive cells in both infected and uninfected mice were very small relative to IgA and IgM immunocytes. The distribution of immunocytes in the lamina propria of infected and uninfected mice was essentially similar and the localization of isotypes in duodenal sections showed no immunoglobulins in the villous epithelial cells. There was also no marked difference between primary and secondary infections indicating that immunoglobulin-containing cells play no major role in functional immunity against hymenolepid infections in the mouse. The presence of IgA and IgM was also demonstrated on the tegument of the tapeworms, although the distribution was patchy and more abundant on H. microstoma than on H. diminuta or H. citelli. The time of appearance of both isotypes was latest on H. citelli.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alghali, S. T. O. (1980) Intestinal immunity to tapeworms: The rejection of Hymenolepis citelli by mice and rats. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Andre, C., Vaerman, J. P. & Heremans, J. F. (1978) Oral immunization of rats with human serum albumin: interference with intestinal absorption and tolerogenic effect. In: Antigen Absorption by the Gut (editor Hemmings, W. A.), pp. 6580. M. T. P. Press: Lancaster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrew, W. & Hall, J. G. (1982) IgA antibodies in the bile of rats. 1. Some characteristics of the primary response. Immunology, 45, 169175.Google ScholarPubMed
Befus, A. D. (1975a) Secondary infections of Hymenolepis diminuta in mice: effects of varying worm burdens in primary and secondary infections. Parasitology, 71, 6175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Befus, A. D. (1975b) Intestinal immune responses of mice to the tapeworms Hymenolepis diminuta and H. microstoma. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Befus, A. D. (1977) Hymenolepis diminuta and H. microstoma: mouse immunoglobulins binding to the tegumental surface. Experimental Parasitology, 41, 242251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beh, K. J. (1980) Antibody-containing cell response of sheep to intestinal infusion of killed Brucella abortus cells. Cellular Immunology, 54, 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beh, K. J. (1985) The antibody-cell response of the lamina propria of the sheep and the uptake of soluble antigen into afferent ileal lymph following intra-intestinal infusion of soluble or particulate antigen. Immunology, 54, 479485.Google ScholarPubMed
Bland, P. (1976) The immune response of the mouse to the tapeworm Hymnolepis diminuta. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Brandtzaeg, P. (1982) Review and discussion of IgA transport across mucosal membranes: In: Recent Advances in Mucosal Immunity, (editor Strober, W., Hanson, L. A. & Sell, K. W.), p. 267. Raven Press: New York.Google Scholar
Cebra, J. J., Kamat, R., Gearheart, P., Robertson, S. & Tseng, J. (1977) The secretory IgA system of the gut. In: Immunology of the Gut, Ciba Foundation Symposium 46, p. 522. Elsevier, Excerpta Medica, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Crandall, R. B., Cebra, J. J. & Crandall, C. A. (1967) The relative proportions of IgG-, IgA- and IgM-containing cells in rabbit tissues during experimental trichinosis. Immunology, 12, 147158.Google ScholarPubMed
Crandall, R. B., Crandall, C. A. & Franco, J. A. (1974) Heligmosomoides polygyrus (=Nematospiroides dubius): Humoral and intestinal immunologic responses to infection in mice. Experimental Parasitology, 35, 275287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deslauriers, N., Neron, S. & Mourad, W. (1985) Immunobiology of the oral mucosa in the mouse. Immunology, 55, 391397.Google ScholarPubMed
Geldof, A. A., Runhart, P., Van DE ENDE, M. B., Kors, N. & Langevoort, H. L. (1984) Morphology, kinetics and secretory activity of antibody forming cells. Immunobiology, 166, 296307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. (1979) Lymphocyte recirculation and the gut: The cellular basis of humoral immunity in the intestine. Blood Cells, 5, 479492.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A. (1980) Immunity and Hymenolepis diminuta. In: Biology of the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta (editor Arai, H. P.), pp. 551614. Academic Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. J. (1976) The growth of secondary infections of Hymenolepis microstoma in mice: the effect of various primary infection regimes. Parasitology, 72, 317323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, J. H. (1982) The fate of antigens. In: Clinical Aspects of Immunology (editors Lachmann, P. J. & Peters, D. K.), 4th edn, p. 161. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford.Google Scholar
Husband, A. J. (1978) An immunization model for the control of infectious enteritis. Research in Veterinary Science, 25, 173177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husband, A. J. (1982) Kinetics of extravasation and redistribution of IgA-specific antibody-containing cells in the intestine. Journal of Immunology, 128, 13551359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husband, A. J. & Dunkley, M. L. (1985) Lack of site of origin effects on distribution of IgA antibody-containing cells. Immunology, 54, 215221.Google ScholarPubMed
Husband, A. J., Monie, H. J. & Gowans, J. L. (1977) The natural history of cells producing IgA in the gut. In: Immunology of the Gut, Ciba Foundation Symposium 46, p. 2954. Elsevier. Excerpta Medica, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. D. & Holborow, E. J. (1973) Immunofluorescence. In: Handbook of Experimental Immunology. (editor Weir, D. M.), Vol. 1, p. 18. 1–18.20. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kagnoff, M. F. (1980) Effects of antigen feeding on intestinal and systemic immune responses. III. Antigen specific serum-mediated suppression of humoral antibody responses after antigen-feeding. Cellular Immunology, 40, 186203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawanashi, H., Saltzman, L. & Strober, W. (1983) Mechanisms regulating IgA class specific immunoglobulin production in murine gut-associated lymphoid tissue. II. Terminal differentiation of post-switch sIgA-bearing Peyer's patch B cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 158, 649669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamm, M. E. (1976) Cellular aspects of IgA. Advances in Immunology, 22, 223290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, J. A. & Waksman, B. H. (1978) Immunologic suppression after oral administration of antigen. I. Specific suppressor cells formed in rat Peyer's patches after oral administration of sheep erythrocytes and their systemic migration. Journal of Immunology, 121, 18781883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcdermott., M. R. & Biennenstock, J. (1979) Evidence for a common mucosal immunologic system. 1. Migration of B immuno-blast into intestinal, respiratory and genital tissues. Journal of Immunology, 122, 18921898.Google Scholar
Miller, H. R. P. (1984) The protective mucosal response against gastro-intestinal nematodes in ruminants and laboratory animals. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 6, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1984) Parasite evasion of the immune response. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, Vol. 21. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richman, L. K., Chiller, J. M., Brown, W. R., Hanson, D. G. & Vaz, N. M. (1978) Enterically induced immunologic tolerance. I. Induction of suppressor T lymphocytes by intragastric administration of soluble proteins. Journal of Immunology, 121, 24292434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sainte-MARIE, G. (1962) A paraffin embedding technique for studies employing immunofluorescence. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 10, 250256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, J. G. & Parrott, D. M. V. (1985) Appearance of delayed-type hypersensitivity effector cells in murine gut mucosa. Immunology, 54, 771776.Google ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1969) Parasites as biological models. Parasitology, 59, 7391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobel, S., Mowat, A., Drummond, H. E., Pickering, G. M. & Ferguson, A. (1983) Immunological responses to fed protein antigens in mice. II. Oral tolerance for CMI is due to activation of cyclophosphamide-sensitive cells by gut-processed antigen. Immunology, 49, 451456.Google ScholarPubMed
Threadgold, L. T. & Befus, A. D. (1977) Hymenolepis diminuta: ultrastructural localization of immunoglobulin-binding sites on the tegument. Experimental Parasitology, 43, 169179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassom, D. L., Dewitt, C. W. & Grundmann., A. W. (1974) Immunity to Hymenolepis citelli by Peromyscus maniculatus: genetic control and ecological implications. Journal of Parasitology, 60, 4752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. F. (1979) Recent advances in the immunology of cestode infections. Journal of Parasitology, 65, 337349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed