Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:10:52.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heterodera schachtii (Schmidt) and Soil Acidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

B. G. Peters
B. G. Peters
Affiliation:
From the Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The possibility of correlating the acidity of the soil with the distribution of cysts of Heterodera schachtii is investigated by a colorimetric method of hydrogen ion determination. The variety of this eelworm which infests potatoes is alone considered, the material being derived from South Lincolnshire—in particular from Kirton and the district around Boston. The samples, general notes and cyst-concentration data are due to Morgan, to whom the writer is greatly indebted.

2. A brief account of the life-history of H. schachtii is given, and also:

3. A note on the theoretical aspect of hydrogen ions and of the colorimetric methods for determining their concentrations.

4. The technique involved is fully discussed, and after various tests is standardized as follows : 2 grams of dry, finely-sieved soil are shaken up with 10 c.c. of twice-distilled water for ¼ hour. The mixture is centrifuged for 5 minutes and diluted with water in the ratio 1:9. A suitable indicator is added, aeration of the solution follows, and the pH-value is read by comparison with indicator-standards in a Walpole Comparator.

It is pointed out that at most the results give the pH-value of the solutions. The pH-value of the soil itself, in situ, is not determined, so that the results are only of relational value.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , August 1926 , pp. 87 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chandler, A. C, 1925.—“Soil Acidity find the Survival of Hookworm Larvæ” Ind. Med. Gazette, vol. LX., p. 10.Google Scholar
Clark, W. M., 1925.—“The Determination of Hydrogen Ions.” Williams & Wilkins Co. (Baltimore), 2nd Edit.Google Scholar
Crowther, E. M., 1922.—“Soil Acidity in its Physico-chemical Aspects.” Trans. Farad. Soc., vol. XVII., No. 2., p. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, E. A., 1921.—“Studies on Soil Reaction.” I. & II. Jour. Ag. Science, vol. XI., No. 1., p. 19.Google Scholar
Gimingham, C. T., 1924.—“The Colorimetric Hydrogen Ion Determination of Soils.” Jour. Ag. Science, vol. XIII., No. 1., p. 69.Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1923.—“Eelworm Disease of Potatoes caused by Tylenchus dipsaci.” Jour. Helm., vol. I., No. 5., p. 197.Google Scholar
Guide to Experiments and Demonstrations on the Kirton Agricultural Institute Farm, 1924.Google Scholar
SirHall, A. D., 1920.—“The Soil.” John Murray (London), 3rd Edit.Google Scholar
Joseph, A. T. & Martin, F. J., 1923.—“The Hydrogen Ion Concentration of Heavy Alkaline Soils.” Jour. Ag. Science, vol. XIII., No. 3., p. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. O., 1925.—“Investigations on Eelworm in Potatoes in South Lincolnshire.” Jour. Helm., vol. III., No. 5., p. 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, C. O. and Fieger, E. A., 1924.—“The Effect of Drying upon the Acidity of Soil Samples.” Science, No. 60., p. 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, H. B.—“The Sugar Beet Nematode and its Control.“ Undated Reprint from ”Sugar” (Chicago).Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1925.—“The Problem of Host Selection and Host Specialization of certain Plant-infesting Nemas and Its Application in the Study of Nemic Pests” Phytopathology, vol. XV., No. 9. p. 499.Google Scholar
Thomas, B., 1925.—“Lime and Liming.“ Reprint from The Fertilizer, Feeding-Stuffs and Farm Supplies Journal,” 02 11th.Google Scholar