Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:37:49.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Helminths collected from Equines in Edinburgh and in London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

P. L. le Roux
P. L. le Roux
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology, University of Edinburgh, and the Department of Helminthology, London School of Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the beginning of October, 1923, the writer had the opportunity of collecting helminths from 25 horses slaughtered in Edinburgh, and from 20 horses and one donkey slaughtered in London.

The Edinburgh material was collected during the months October, November and December from aged horses, the London material during February, March and April, likewise from aged horses and from a very old donkey. The donkey was found to harbour at least 26 species of nematodes, 15 of which have not hitherto been recorded from England.

From the horses examined in London, 38 species of helminths were obtained, 19 of which are new to England, and in Edinburgh 38 species, 11 of which have not hitherto been recorded from Scotland.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1924 , pp. 111 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelmann, 1908.—“Das aneurysma verminosum equivon pathologisch—anatomischen, statischen, klinischen und zoologischen standpunkte.” Archiv. f. wiss. it. prakt. Tierheilk., Bd. xxiv., No. 3, pp. 297–342.Google Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1914.—“A list of Nematode Parasites observed in the alimentary canal of sheep in England.” Parasitology, vii., pp. 240–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1916.—“Sclerostome parasites of the horse in England. I. The genera Triodontophorus and Œsophagodontus.” Parasitology, VIII., pp. 420–438.Google Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1917.—“Sclerostome parasites of the horse in England. II. New species of the Genus Cylichnostomum.” Parasitology, ix., pp. 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1920 a.—“Sclerostomes of the donkey in Zanzibar and East Africa.” Parasitology, XII., pp. 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1920 b.—“On some Nematode parasites of the Zebra.” Parasitology, XII., pp. 98–107.Google Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1921.—“Strongylid parasites of horses in the Punjab.” Parasitology, XII, pp. 315–326.Google Scholar
Gobbold, T. Spenser, 1874.—“Observations on rare parasites from the Horse (Trichonema arcuata.)” Veterinarian, XLVII., pp. 84–87.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. Spenser, 1874.—“Further remarks on rare parasites of the Horse.” Veterinarian, XLVII., pp. 218–246.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. Spenser, 1875.—“Epizooty in the horse; more especially in relation to the ravages produced by the four-spined Strongyle (Strongylus tetracan thus). Veterinarian, XLVII., pp. 237–238.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. Spenser, 1879.—“Parasites; Entozoa of Man and Animals.”Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. Spenser, 1884.—“New parasites from the Horse and Ass.” Veterinarian, LVII., pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. Spenser, 1886.—“Description of Strongylus arnfieldi (Cobb.) with observations on Strongylus tetracanthus (Mehl.)” Journ. Linn. Soc. Zool., XIX., pp. 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, C. M., 1851.—“Systema Helminthum.” vol.II pp. 303–305.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire naturelle des Helminthes ou vers intestinaux.” pp. 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedoelst, L., 1911.—“Synopsis de parasitologie dc l'homme et des animaux domestiques.” pp. 119 and 126–128.Google Scholar
Gedoelet, L., 1916.—“Notes sur la faune parasitaire du Congo Belge.” Rev. Zool. Africaine, pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
Giles, G. M. J., 1892.—“Some observations on the life-history of Scicrostomum tetracanthutn Diesing, and Scicrostomiasis in equine animals; in connection with a so-called outbreak of Surra at Shillong.” Scient. Mem. by Med. Officers of the Army of India. Part VII., pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Giles, G. M. J., 1892.—“On a new Scicrostome from the large intestine of Mules.” Scient. Mem. by Med. Officers of the Army of India, VII., pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E., 1787.—“Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewurmer thierescher Körper,” Tab., IX., B. 10–11, p. 137.Google Scholar
Gurlt, E. F., 1831.—“Lehrbuch der pathologischen Anatomic der Haus-saugel hiere,” Berlin, 1831, pp. 355–356, Tab. vi., Figs. 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1924.—“Developments in Veterinary Parasitology during the past fifteen years.” Veterinary Medicine XIX., No. 3, p. 191.Google Scholar
Hoare, E. W., 1910.—“Parasitic gastritis in a Marc.” Vet. Record, XXIII., No. 1163, p. 251.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1919.—“Cylicostomum nanum, cen nieuwe Strongylide van het paard.” Tijdschr. v. Diergeneesk. Dl. XLVI.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1920 a.—“Hexodontostomum Markusi n. gen., n. sp., cinc neuc Strongylide des Pferdes.” Centralbl. f. Bakt. abt. I. Orig. Bd. LXXXIV., pp. 43–46.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1920 b—. ”Eine neue Cylicostome—Art (C. mucronatum) aus dem darm des Pferdes.” Centralbl. f. Bakt. abt. I. Orig. Bd., LXXXIV., pp. 132–134.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1920 c.—“Een nieuwc Cylicostome—soort (C. brevicapsulatum) uit den darm van het paard.” Tijdsch. v. Diergeneesk., Dl., XLVII., pp. 562–565.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1920 d.—“Cylicostomum ultrajectinum, cen nieuwe Strongylide uit den darm van het paard.” Tijdsch. v. Diergeneesk., Dl., XLVII., p. 279.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1920 e.—“Cylicostomum brevicapsulatum n. sp., eine neue Strongylide aus dem darm des Pferdes.” Centralbl. f. Bahr. Abt. I. Orig., Bd., LXXXIV.. pp. 562–565.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1920 f.—“Bemerkungen uber die Gattungen Cylicostomum, Poterios tomum and Craterostomum.” Centralbl. f. Bahr. Abt. I. Orig., Bd., LXXXV., pp. 267–275.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1921 a.—“Das Mānnchen von Cylicostomum ultrajectinum.” Centralbl. f. Bahr. Abt. I. Orig., Bd., LXXXV., pp. 372–374.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1921 b.—“On the genus Cylicostomum.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasitology XI., pp. 397–402.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1922 a.—“Over de verdeeling van het geslacht Cylicostomum.” Tijdsch. v. Diergeneesk. Dl. XLIX., pp. 135–136.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., 1922 b.—“De in de dikken darm van het paard levende volwassen Strongyliden (Sclerostomen).” Rapport der Commissie voor het Sclerostomiasis-ondergoekin Nederland. I. Zool. Gedeelte.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E. W., AND Van Oordt, G. J., 1920.—“The larval development of Oxyuris equi (Schrank).” Konink Akad. van Wetensch. to Amsterdam, XXIII., pp. 603, etc.Google Scholar
Ihle, J. E.W., AND Van Oordt, G. J..1923.—“On some Strongylid larvae in the horse, especially those of Cylicostomum.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit, XVII., pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
Kötlan, A., 1919.—“Beitrage zur Helminthologie Ungarns. I. Neue Sclerostotmiden aus dem Pferd. Vorlaufige Mitteilung.” Centralbl f.. Bak. Abt. I. Orig., Bd., LXXXIII., pp. 557–560.Google Scholar
Kötlan, A., 1921.—“Two new Cylicostomum species from the Horse.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., No. 3., pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1910 a.—“Exhibition of a series of specimens of Entozoa.” Proc. Zool. Soc., London. Part 1, p. 147.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. 1910 b.—Veterinary Record, XXIII No. 1166, p. 326.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1913.—“A new Cylicostome worm from the Horse in London.” Veterinary Journal, LXXIX., pp. 460–462.Google Scholar
Leuchart, R., 1876.—“Die menschlichen Parasiten und die vou ihnen herruhrenden Krankheiten.” Band II., pp. 433–454.Google Scholar
Looss, A., 1902.—“The Sclerostomidm of horses and donkeys in Egypt.” Rec. Egypt. Govern. School of Medicine, 1901.Google Scholar
Mehlis, E., 1831.—“(Discussion of F. C. H. Creplin's,” “Novæ observations de Entozois.”) Isis von Oken, 1831, pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
Mettam, A. E., 1910 a.—“A new (?) Sclerostome of the Horse.” Veter. Record, XXIII., No. 1161, pp. 209–210.Google Scholar
Mettam, A. E., 1910 b.—“The so-called new Sclerostomes.” Veter. Record, XXIII. No. 1164, p. 289.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F., 1780.—“Icones Zoologicæ Danicæ,” Vol. II., Tab. Fig. 12.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F., 1788.—“Zoologica Danica—Descriptiones et Historia.” Vol. II. 2 and 3, Tab. XLII., Fig. 12.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1912.—“Parasitologie des Animaux Domestiques.” Paris pp. 716–717.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1918.—“Contribution à l'ètude des organes reproducteurs ct de la reproduction chez les Strongyles depouvous de capsule buccale (Metastrongylidæ). Mem. Soc. Zool. de France, Tome XXVII., p. 18.Google Scholar
Penberthy, , 1897.—“Gastritis due to a small Strongyle.” Vet. Record, IX., p. 598.Google Scholar
Pillers, A. W. N., 1910.—“The so-called Sclerostomes.” Vet. Record, XXIII pp. 249–251.Google Scholar
Pillers, A. W. N., 1915.—“Parasites and Parasitic Diseases.” Hoare's System of Veterinary Medicine, London, pp. 1533–1540.Google Scholar
Quiel, G., 1919 a.—“Poteriostomum n.g., eine neue, beim Pferde parasitierende Nematodengattung.” Centralbl. f. Bakt, Abt. 1, Orig. Bd., LXXXIII.. pp. 466–472.Google Scholar
Quiel., G., 1919 b.—“Eine neuer pferdeparasit, Pseudosclerostomum, n.g. (Nema tode),” Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunder, Berlin, Jhrg. 1919.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1917.—“L'Oxyurose des Equides.” Rec. de Med. Veterinaire. Tome XCIII., No. 19, pp. 517–541.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1923 a.—“Les Strongles (Anciens Sclerostomes) et les Strongyloses proprement dites.” Rec. de Med. Veterinaire, Tome XCIX., No. 13, pp. 376–395.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1923 b.—“Le Veritable Strongylus tetracanthus Mehlis et son role pathogens.” Annales de Parasitologie. Tome I., No. 1, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., AND Henry, A., 1902.—“Sur les Sclerostomiens des Equides.” C. R. Soc. Biol., France, LIV., p. 256.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., AND Henry, A.. 1903.—“Une forme larvaire de l'Oxyure du cheval.” Archives de Parasitologie, VII., p. 133.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., AND Henry, A., 1909 a.—“Sur la classification des Strongyliæ: I. Metastrongylidæ” C. R. Soc. Biol. LXVI., pp. 85–88.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., AND Henry, A., 1909 b.—“Sur la classification des Strongyliæ: II. Ankylostominæ.” C. R. Soc. Biol., LXVI., pp. 168–171.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., AND Henry, A., 1916.—“Sur Ics Oxyurides.” C. R. Soc. Biol., LXXIX., pp. 113–115.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1808.—Entoz. sive Vertu. Intcstinalium Historia Naturalis. Vol. I., pp. 319 and 325.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1809.—Entoz. sive Vertu. Intcstinalium Historia Naturalis, Vol. II., pp. 35 and 204–209.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—Entoz. Synopsis, pp. 30 and 259–260.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., 1866.—Monographie der Nematoden. pp. 133–134.Google Scholar
Smit, H. J., AND Notosoediro, R., 1923.—“Nog eenige Strongyliden van het paard op Java.” Veearsenijkundige Meedeling, Nos. 43 and 44.Google Scholar
Theiler, A., 1918.—“Nodes and Nodules in the lungs of South African Equines.” The Seventh and Eighth Reports of the Directors of Veterinary Research, April, 1918. pp. 180–336.Google Scholar
Theiler, G., 1923.—“The Strongylids and other Nematodes parasitic in the intestinal tract of South African Equines.” Pretoria, 1923.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1921.—“Ensaio Monografico da fam. Trichostrongylidm Leiper.” Memo. do. Inst. Osvaldo Cruz., XIII., pp 13 and 15.Google Scholar
Turner, M., 1920.—“On the Nematode parasites of a Chapman's Zebra.” Proc. 'Zool. Soc. London, 1919, pp. 441–451.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1918 a.—“Strongylidæ in Horses. I. Cylicostomum longibursatum sp. n., II. Cylicostomum minutum sp. n., III. Cylicostomum nassatum Looss var. parvum.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XI., pp. 399–416.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1918 b.—IV. Gyalocephalus capitatus Looss. V. Gyalocephalus equi sp. n. Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XI., pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1919 a.—“VI. Cylicostomum pseudo-catinatum.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XIII., pp. 273–278.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1919 b.—“VII. Cylicostomum pateratum sp. n.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XIII., pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1919 c.—“VIII. Species found in American horses.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XIII., pp. 137–148.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1920.—“IX. Cylicostomum tridentatum sp. n., X. On the genus Poteriostomum Quiel. XIII. Cylicostomum triramosum sp. n.” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XIV., pp. 153–157 and 159–163.Google Scholar
Yorke, W., AND Macfie, J. W. S., 1923.—“Trichonema tetracanthum Mehlis of Looss, 1900,” Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit., XVII., p. 439.Google Scholar