Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:42:24.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Goezia bangladeshi n. sp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from an anadromous fish Tenualosa ilisha (Clupeidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

M. Akther ,
A. Alam ,
J. D'Silva ,
A.I. Bhuiyan ,
G.A. Bristow  and
B. Berland
M. Akther
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh:
A. Alam
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh:
J. D'Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh:
A.I. Bhuiyan
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh:
G.A. Bristow*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007, Bergen, Norway
B. Berland
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007, Bergen, Norway
*
*Author for correspondenceFax: 55 58 96 73 Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 1432 hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (=Hilsa ilisha) from 11 fresh water, brackish water and marine localities in Bangladesh yielded 13 adult Goezia bangladeshi n. sp., all specimens being found in the intestine of a single fish host caught in the lower Ganges. A total of 2372 Goezia juveniles were recovered from 490 infected fish (prevalence 34.2%). This is the first Goezia species recorded from Bangladesh, and it differs from other valid species by the number of caudal papillae (pre 7–9, para 3, post 6); encircled by tiny spines, the position of double papillae, the arrangement of body spines, and the length ratio of the intestinal caecum and the ventricular appendix (1: 3.33–4.72). Juveniles were free in the gut, embedded in the gut wall and encapsulated in mesenteries. Tenualosa ilisha serves as the definitive host, but the predominance of juveniles may indicate that piscivorous hosts may also serve as such. A list of the nominal Goezia species with important characters is provided.

Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 105 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

References

Ali, M.Y. (1968) Investigation of fish diseases and parasites in East Pakistan. Bulletin de l'Office International des Epizooties 69: 1517–1521.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R.C. (1988) Nematode transmission patterns. Journal of Parasitology 74: 30–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arya, S.N. (1980) A new nematode parasite of the genus Goezia Zeder, 1800 from a marine fish of India. Indian Journal of Helminthology 30: 96–99.Google Scholar
Bashirullah, A.K.M. (1973) A brief survey of the helminth fauna of certain marine and freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Zoology 1: 63–81.Google Scholar
Berland, B. (1961) Nematodes from some Norwegian marine fishes. Sarsia 2: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berland, B. (1998) Biology of Hysterothylacium species. pp. 373–378 in Tada, I., Kojima, S. & Tsuji, M. (Eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Parasitology, Makuhari Messe, Chiba, Japan, August 24–28, 1998. Bologna, Italy, Monduzzi Editore.Google Scholar
Bhuiyan, A.I. (2002) Parasites of hilsa shad, Tenualosa hilsa: taxonomy, epidemiology and as biological tags. 163 pp. PhD thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Bilqees, F.M., Fatima, H. Rehana, R. (1977) Marine fish nematodes of Pakistan. VIII. Goezia pakistanica sp. n. (Heterocheilidae) from Parastromateus niger (Bl) of Karachi coast. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 20: 270–274.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.C. (1935) Parasites of fishes of Galveston Bay. Proceedings of the US National Museum 83: 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, N.C. Day, J. (1992) A new species of the genus Goezia Zeder, 1800 (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from the fish, Mastacembelus armatus (Lacep.) from West Bengal, India. Systematic Parasitology 22: 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, T.L. Overstreet, R.M. (1979) Goezia lacerticola sp. n. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Alligator mississippiensis from Florida. Journal of Helminthology 53: 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, T.L. Overstreet, R.M. (1980) Taxonomy and biology of North American species of Goezia (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from fishes, including three new species. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 47: 192–217.Google Scholar
Diesing, K.M. (1839) Neue Gattungen von Binnenwürmern nebst einem Nachträge zur Monographie der Amphistomen. Annalen des Wiener Museums der Naturgeschichte 2: 219–242.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R.P. (1935) Nématodes du genre Goezia chez une truite arc-en-ciel (Salmo irideus W. Gibbons) d'élevage. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 60: 244–265.Google Scholar
Gibson, D.I. (1979) Materials and methods in alpha-taxonomy. Parasitology 79 xxxvi.Google Scholar
Gibson, D.I. (1983) The systematics of ascaridoid nematodes – a current assessment. pp. 321–338 in Stone, A.R., Platt, H.M. & Khalil, L.F. (Eds) Concepts in nematode systematics. x + 388 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goeze, J.A.E. (1782) Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer thierischer Körper. xi+471 pp. Blakenburg.Google Scholar
Hartwich, G. (1974) Keys to genera of the Ascaridoidea. CIH keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates no. 2. iv+15 pp. Slough, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Hartwich, G. (1975) Parasitische Rundwürmer von Wirbeltieren. I, Rhabditida und Ascaridida. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands , 62. Teil, 256 pp.Google Scholar
Hsü, H.F. (1933) Remarks on some morphological characters of parasitic nematodes of man and dogs together with description of a new Goezia species from Yangtze beaked sturgeon. Chinese Medical Journal 47: 1289–1297.Google Scholar
Johnston, T.H. Mawson, P. (1940) Some nematodes parasitic in Australian freshwater fish. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 64: 340–352.Google Scholar
Kaur, J. Khera, S. (1991) Goezia (Goezia) alli sp. n. (Nematoda) from a freshwater fish, Channa striatus (Bloch), from Ludhiana (Punjab, India), and revision of the genus. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 36: 51–54.Google Scholar
Khan, D. Yaseen, T. (1969) Helminth parasites of the fishes of East Pakistan 1. Nematodes. Bulletin Department of Zoology, University of the Panjab University (New Series) 4: 1–33.Google Scholar
Køie, M. (1993) Aspects of the life cycle of and morphology of Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802) (Nematoda, Ascaridoidea, Anisakidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 1289–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lèbre, C. Petter, A.J. (1983) Deux nouvelles especes d'Ascarides (Nematoda) parasites de Poissons Téléostéens: Raphidascaris mediterraneusi n. sp. et Goezia anguillae n. sp.: complément de description de Cucullanus micropapillatus Törnquist, 1931 (Nematoda, Cucullanidae). Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris 5: 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maplestone, P.A. (1930) Parasitic nematodes obtained from animals dying in the Calcutta Zoological Gardens. Parts 1–3. Records of the Indian Museum 32: 385–412.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1859) Prospectus helminthum, quae in parte secunda prodromi faunae helmithologicae venetae continentur. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschafte in Wien, mathematisch–naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 38: 287–302.Google Scholar
Moravec, F. (1994) Parasitic nematodes of freshwater fishes of Europe, 473 pp. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Moravec, F., Kohn, A. Fernandes, B.M.M. (1994) Two species of the genus Goezia, G. brasiliensis sp. n. and G. brevicaeca sp. n. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from fresh water fishes in Brazil. Folia Parasitologica 41: 271–278.Google Scholar
Mozgovoy, A.A., Shakmatova, V.I. Semenova, M.K. (1971) On the life cycle of Goezia ascaroides (Ascaridata: Goeziidae), a nematode of freshwater fish. Sbornik rabot po gel'mintologii, Moscow, 259–265 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Osmanov, S.U. (1940) Studies on the parasitology of the Black Sea fishes. Uchenge Zapiski Leningradskogo Gosudarstrenvogo Pedagogicheskogo Instituta Imeni I. I. Gertsena 30: 187–263 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Osorio-Sarabia, D. (1982) Descripción de una nueva especie del génerio Goezia Zeder, 1800 (Nematoda: Goeziidae) en peces de agua dulce de México. Anales del Instituto de Biologia Universidad National Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Zoologia 52: (1981) 71–87.Google Scholar
Punt, A. (1941) Recherches sur quelques nématodes parasites de poissons de la Mer du Nord. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique Mémoire no. 98, 1–110.Google Scholar
Rasheed, S. (1965) On a remarkable new nematode Lappetascaris lutjani gen. et sp. nov. (Anisakidae: Ascaridoidea) from marine fishes of Karachi and an account of Thynascaris inquies (Linton, 1901) n. comb. and Goezia intermedia n. sp. Journal of Helminthology 39: 313–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehana, R. Bilqees, F.M. (1972) Goezia pseudoascaroides n. sp. (Nematoda: Heterocheilidae) from a fresh water fish Mastacembalus pancalus (Ham.) of Kalri lake, Sind area, West Pakistan. pp. 87–91 in Bilqees, F.M., Saeed, R., Rehana, R., Khatoon, A. & Kaikabad, S.H. (Eds) Helminth parasites of some vertebrates chiefly from fishes of West Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan. 110 pp. Agricultural Research Council, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
Soota, T.D. (1983) Studies on nematode parasites of Indian vertebrates. I. Fishes. Records of the Zoological Survey of India . Miscellaneous Publications and Occasional Paper No. 54: 10–353.Google Scholar
Sprent, J.F.A. (1978) Ascaridoid nematode of amphibians and reptiles: Goezia . Journal of Helminthology 52: 92–98.Google Scholar
Stefanski, W. (1938) Goezia sigalasi n. sp., parasite d'une vive (Trachinus draco). Livro Jubilar L Travassos, Rio de Janerio, 447–454.Google Scholar
Zaidi, D.A. Khan, D. (1975) Nematode parasites from fishes of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 7: 51–73.Google Scholar
Zeder, J.G.H. (1800) Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer, mit Zusätzen und Anmerkungen herausgegeben. xx+320 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar