Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:03:15.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Genera and Species of the Subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky, 1922 (Nematoda): a Nomenclatorial Analysis—including an Addendum on the Composition of the Family Rhabditidae Örley, 1880*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Ellsworth C. Dougherty
Ellsworth C. Dougherty
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine University of California, Berkeley, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Oakland, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nine genera, listed on pages 122–128 are recognized in the subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky, 1922, in place of three genera recognized by Osche (1952) in his recent revision of the genus Rhabditis Dujardin [1844] (sensu lato). Two of the genera—Pelodera Schneider, 1866 and Rhabditis (sensti stricto)—are subdivided into four and five subgenera respectively. One genus—Brevibucca Goodey, 1985—is accepted only provisionally in the Rhabditinae. The genus Neorhabditis Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1954 (syn. Pararhabditis Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1951; non Baylis and Daubney, 1926) is regarded as not belonging in the Rhabditinae

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 1955 , pp. 105 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abuladze, K. I., 1934.— “K obnaruzheniiu dvukh predstavitelei roda Rhabditis v fokaliakh krupnogo rogatogo skota”. Trudy Viat. Gosud. Vet. Inst. 1, 31–38.Google Scholar
Allgén, C. A., 1932.— “Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der marinen Nematoden fauna der Campbellinsel”. Nyt Mag. Naturv., 70, 97–198. (W.L. 15380.)Google Scholar
Allgén, C. A., 1947.— “Pelagonema obtusicaudum Filipjev in the southern hemisphere and notes on two other nematodes from the Campbell Island”. Ark. Zool., 39B, 1–4. (W.L. 2006.)Google Scholar
Allgén, C. A., 1949.— “Über einige sadschwedische Brackwasser- und Erdnematoden”. K. fysiogr. Sallsk. Lund. Forh., 19, 1–19. (W.L. 11866b.)Google Scholar
Allgén, C. A., 1950.— “Über einige schwedische saprobisch lebende Nematoden”. K. fysiogr. Sallsk. Lund. Forh., 20, 24–29.Google Scholar
Allgén, C. A., 1951a.— “Westschwedische marine litorale und terrestrische Nematoden”. Ark. Zool., s. 2. 1, 301–344. (W.L. 2006.)Google Scholar
Allgén, C. A., 1951b.— “Über einige westschwedische terrestrisch lebende Nematoden”. Zool. Anz., 146, 354–357. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Altherr, E., 1938.— “La faune des mines de Bex, avec étude spéciale des nématodes”. Rev. Suisse Zool., 45, 567–720. (W.L. 19288.)Google Scholar
Altherr, E., 1950.— “Les nématodes du Pare National Suisse. (Nématodes libres du sol.)”. Erbegbn. wiss. Unters. schweiz. NatParks, n.s., 3, no. 22, 1–46. (W.L. 7967a.)Google Scholar
Artigas, P., 1927.— “Nematodeos de invertebrados. (V)”. Bol. biol. Fac. Med. S. Paulo (1927). no. 10. 209–210. (W.L. 3061c.)Google Scholar
Baird, W., 1858.— “Descriptio of two new species of Entozoa”. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., s. 3. 2, 306–307. (W.L. 1050.) (Also: Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., (1858), pt. 26, 224–225. (W.L. 16790.))Google Scholar
Barthélemy, A., 1858.— “Éludes sur le déVeloppement et les migrations d'un nématolde parasite de l'oeuf de la limace grise”. Ann. Sci. nat. (6), s. 4, 10, 41–48. pl. 5. (W.L. 915.)Google Scholar
Bassen, J. L., 1940.— “Rhabditis chitwoodi n. sp., a nematode found in diseased Sagittaria corms, with remarks on Rhabditis conica (Reiter), n. comb”. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 7, 98–101. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Bastian, H. C., 1865.— “Monograph on the Anguilhtlidae, or free nematoids, marine, land, and fresh-water; with descriptions of 100 new species”. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., 25, 73–184, pls. 9–13. (Not in W.L.!)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R., 1926.— “A synopsis of the families and genera of Nematoda”. London, xxxvi–277 pp.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R.[A.É.], [1886 “Anguillules, anguillulides”. Grande Encyc. inventaire raisonné…, 2, 1178–1179.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R.[A.É.], 1896.—“Parasites animaux”. In: Bouchard, C. (Ed.), Traité de Pathologie générale, 2, 649–810.Google Scholar
Bovien, P., 1937.— “Some types of association between nematodes and insects”. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh., 101, 1–114. (W.L. 22535.)Google Scholar
Bresslau, E. L. and Schuurmans Stekhoven, J. H., Jr., 1940.— “Marine freilebende Nematoda aus der Nordsee”. Brussels, 74 pp., 14 pls.Google Scholar
Bütschli, O., 1873.— “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der freilebenden Nematoden”. Nova Acta Leop. Carol, 36, 144 pp., pls. 17–27. (W.L. 15318.)Google Scholar
Bütschli, O., 1876.— “Untersuchungen über freilebende Nematoden und die Gattung Chaetonotus”. Z. wiss. Zool., 26, 363–413, pls. 23–26. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1930.— “Studies on some physiological functions and morphological characters of Rhabditis (Rhabditidac, Nematodes)”. J. Morph., 49, 251–275. (W.L. 11373.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1933a.— “Notes on nematode systematics and nomenclature”. J. Parasit., 19, 242–243. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1933b.— “A note on the systematic position of Cruznema cruzrtema Atrigas [sic], 1927”. J. Parasit., 19, 253.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1933c.— “On some nematodes of the superfamily Rhabditoidea and their status as parasites of reptiles and amphibians”. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 23, 508–520. (W.L. 11600.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1935a.— “Nomenclatorial notes, I”. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 2, 51–54. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1935b.— “Nematodes parasitic in, and associated with, Crustacea, and descriptions of some new species and a new variety”. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 2, 93–96. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1950a.— “An outline classification of the Nematoda”. [Appendix to] Chapt. II, General Structure of nematodes. An Introduction to Nematology (Revised Ed.), sect. I, pp. 12–27.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G., 1950b.—Chap. V, Cephalic structures and stoma, An Introduction to Nematology, pp. 56–77.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. and Chitwood, M. B., 1934.— “Daubaylia potomaca, n. sp., a nematode parasite of snails, with a note on other nemas associated with molluscs”. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 1, 8–9. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. and Chitwood, M. B., 1937a.— “Snails as hosts and carriers of nematodes and Nematomorpha”. Nautilus, 50, 130–135. (W.L. 14966.)Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. and Chitwood, M. B., 1937b.— “Outline classification of Nematoda”. [Appendix to] An Introduction to Nematology, sect. I, pt. I, pp. 49–52.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. and Mcintosh, A., 1934.— “A new variety of Alloionema (Nematoda: Diplogasteridae), with a note on the genus”. Proc. helminth. Soc Wash., 1, 37–38. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A., 1930.— “On variations in size of the nematode worm Rhabdilis sttccaris n. sp., produced by different culture media”. J. Helminth., 8, 211–222. (W.L. 11224c.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, C.[F.W.]. 1862.— “Über einige im Humus lebende Anguilluliden”. Zeit. wiss. Zool., 12, 354–359, tab. 35. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1893a.— “Nematodes, mostly Australian and Fijian”. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W., Macleay Mem. Vol., pp. 252–308, pls. 36–12. (W.L. 16790a.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1893b.— “Plant diseases and their remedies”. Agric. Gaz. N. S. W., 4, 777–833. (W.L. 278.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1898.— “Extract from MS. report on the parasites of stock”. Agric. Gaz. N. S. W., 9, 296–321; 419–454.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1913.— “New nematode genera found inhabiting fresh water and non-brackish soils”. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 3, 432–444. (W.L. 11600.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1914.— “The North American free-living fresh-water nematodes. Contributions to a science of nematology, II”. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 33, 69—[133], pls. 2–8. (W.L. 21400a.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1924a.— “Observations on nemas”. J. Parasit., 11, 107–109. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1924b.— “Foods of rhabdites and their relatives, with descriptions of two new rhabdites and a new rhabditoid genus”. J. Parasit., 11, 116–117.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1929.— “Observations on the morphology and physiology of nemas; including notes on new species”. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 19, 283–286. (W.L. 11600.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1884.— “New parasites from the horse and ass”. Veterinarian, Lond., 57 [s. 4, 30], 4–7. (W.L. 22503.)Google Scholar
De Coninck, L. A., 1935.— “Contribution a la connaissancc des nématodes libres du Congo Beige. I.—Les nématodes libres des marais de la Nyamuamba (Ruwenzori) et des sources chaudes du Mont Banze (Lac Kivu)”. Rev. Zool. Dot. afr., 26, 211–232; 249–326. (W.L. 19322.)Google Scholar
De Man, J. G., 1876.— “Onderzoekingen overvrij in de aarde levende Nematoden”. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., 2, 78–196, pls. 3–13. (W.L. 21275.)Google Scholar
De Man, J. G., 1880.— “Die einheimischen, frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebende Nematoden monographisch bearbeitet”. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., 5, 1–104.Google Scholar
De Man, J. G., 1884.— “Die frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebenden Nematoden der niederländischen Fauna. Eine systematisch-faunistische Monographic” Leiden, iv+206 pp., 34 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, J. G., 1895.— “Description of three species of Anguillulidae, observed in diseased pseudo-bulbs of tropical orchids”. Proc. Lpool. biol. Soc., 9, 76–94, pls. 3–5. (W.L. 16792.)Google Scholar
Dewitz, J., 1892.— “Die Eingeweidewürmer der Haussâugetiere”. Berlin, V + 180 pp.Google Scholar
Dougherty, E. C. 1953.— “The genera of the subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky. 1922 (Nematoda)”. Thapar Commemoration Volume 1953, pp. 69–76.Google Scholar
Dougherty, E. C. and Nigon, V., 1949.— “A new species of the free-living nematode genus Rhabditis of interest in comparative physiology and genetics”. J. Parasit., 35 pt. 6, sect. 2, 11. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., [1844].— “Historic Naturellc des Helminthes ou Vers Intestinaux”. Paris, XVI + 654 + 15 pp. + 12 plates (1845).Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. G., 1915.— “Die Naturgeschichte der Nematoden und einiger anderer Parasiten. 1. des Ips typographus L. 2. des Hylobius abietus L”. Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1) 38, 109–222. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. G. 1930.— “Neue an Borken- und Rüsselkäfer gebundene Nematoden, halbparasitische und Wohnungseinmieter. Freilebende Nematoden aus Moos und Walderde in Borken- und Rüsselkäfergängen”. Zool. Jb., 59, 505–646.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. G. 1931.— “Einige neue Rhabditis-Arten”. Zool. Jb., 62, 119–148.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. C, 1937.— “Neue parasitische und halbparasitische. Nematoden bei Borkenkäfern und einige andere Nematoden. I. Teil”. Zool. Jb., 70, 291–380.Google Scholar
Goffart, H., 1935a.— “Rhabditis gracilis n. sp. (Rhabditidae, Nematoda) als Bewohner faulender Kakaofrüchte”. Zool. Anz., 109, 135–138. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Goffart, H., 1935b.— “Bemerkung zu meinem Aufsatz: Rhabditis gracilis n. sp. (Rhabditidae, Nematoda) als Bewohner faulender Kakaofrüchte. Zool. Jb., 111, 223.Google Scholar
Golovin, E., 1901.— “Nabliudeniia nad nematodami. (Okonchanie.)” Uchen. Zap. kazan. Univ., 68, pt. 9 (Chast' Neofiits. Otdel Nauk), 1–50, 3 pls. (W.L. 21992.)Google Scholar
Golovin, E., 1902.— “Nabliudeniia nad nematodami. Prodolzhenie.)” Uchen. Zap. kazan. Univ., 69, pt. 4 (Chast' Neoffits, Otdel Nauk). 71–190; pt. 5/6 (Prilozheniia), pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1927.— “Cylindrogaster coprophaga gen. et sp. nov. A nematode found in a culture of faeces from a wild brown rat”. J. Helminth., 5, 25–32. (W.L. 11224c.)Google Scholar
Goodev, T., 1929.— “On some new and little-known free-living nematodes”. J. Helminth., 7, 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T., 1935.— “Brevibucca saprophaga gen. et sp. nov., a nematode from a rotting lily bulb-scale”. J. Helminth., 13, 223–228.Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1939.— “Cylindrocorpus nom. nov. for Cylindrogaster GOODEY, 1927 (Nematoda)”. J. Helminth., 17, 149–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T., [1943],— “Brevibucca frugicola n. sp., a saprophagous nematode found in a rotting peach fruit”. J. Helminth., 20, 1–5 (1942).Google Scholar
Goodey, T., [1944].— “On Rhabditis curvicaudata (Schneider) and R. paraciliata n. sp”. J. Helminth., 21, 10–17 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T., 1945.— “A note on the subfamily Turbatricinae and the genus Turbator Goodey, 1943”. J. Helminth., 21, 69–70.Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1951.— “Soil and freshwater nematodes. A monograph”. London and New York, xxvi + 390 pp.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, R. O., 1949.— “Nuevo genero y especic de nematode saprobionte”. Rev. Invest agric, B. Aires, 3, 403–412. (W.L. 18870a.)Google Scholar
Hertwig, P., 1922.— “Beobachtungen über die Fortpflanzungsweise und die systematische Einteilung der Regenwurmnematoden”. Z. wiss. Zool., 119, 537–558. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Hirschmann, H., 1952.— “Die Nematoden der Wassergrenze mittelfränkischer Gewässer”. Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1), 81, 313–407. (W.L. 23821.)Google Scholar
Hnatewytsch, B., 1929.— “Die Fauna der Erzgruben von Schneebergen”. Zool. Jb., 56, 174–255.Google Scholar
Holl, F. J., 1928.— “Two new nematode parasites”. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc, 43, 184–185, pl. 28. (W.L. 11179.)Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1951.— “Acanthocephala, Aschelminthes, and Entoprocta. The pseudocoelomate Bilateria”. The Invertebrates, 3, v+572 pp.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoölogical Nomenclature, 1928.— “Opinion 104. 57 generic names placed in the Official List”. Smithson. misc. Coll., 73, pt. 5, 25–28. (W.L. 20256.)Google Scholar
Jagerskiöld, L. A. [K. E.] 1905.— “Bttnonema richtersi n.g. n. sp. Ein eingentümlicher neuer Landnematode aus dem Schwarzwald von Kerguelen und Possession-Island (Crozet-Inseln)”. Zool. Anz., 28, 557–561. (W.L. 23833.).Google Scholar
Janet, C., 1893.— “Sur les nématodes des glandes pharyngiennes des fourmis (Pelodera sp.)”. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 117, 700–703. (W.L. 6628.)Google Scholar
Johnson, G. E., 1913.— “On the nematodes of the common earthworm”. Quart. J. micro. Sci., n. s., no. 232 [58 (4)], 605–652, pl. 37. (W.L. 17510.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1938.— “A census of the free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes recorded as living in Australia”. Trans, toy. Soc. S. Aust., 62, 149–167. (W.L. 21654.)Google Scholar
Körner, H., 1954.— “Die Nematodenfauna des vergehenden Holzes und ihre Beziehung zu den Insekten”. Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1), 82, 245–353. (W.L. 2^831.)Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1929.— “Freilebende terrestrische Nematoden aus der Umgebung von Peking (China). I”. Zool. Anz., 84, 283–294. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1930.— “Freilebende terrestrische Nematoden aus der Umgebung von Peking (China)”. Zool. Jb., 87, 67–87.Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1932a.— “Trionchonema rusticum n. g. n. sp., a parasitic nematode from the land snail, Polygyra espicola Bland (Hehcidae)”. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 51, 48–56. (W.L. 21400a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1932b.— “Beiträge zur Kenntnis pflanzenparasitischer Nematoden”. Z. Parasitenk., 5, 184–194. (W.L. 23536a.)Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A. and Faust, E. C., 1933.— “Two new species of Rhabditis (Rhabditis macrocerca and R. clavopapillata) associated with dogs and monkeys in experimental Strongyloides studies”. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 52, 162–172. (W.L. 21400a.)Google Scholar
Krüger, E., 1913.— “Fortpflanzung und Keimzellenbildung von Rhabditis aberrans, nov. sp”. Zeit. wiss. Zool., 105, 87–124, pls. 3–6. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Leuckart, [K. G. F.] R., 1891.— “Über einen an Aphodius fimentarius sich verpuppenden freilebenden Rundwurm, Rhabditis coarctata n. sp”. Verh. dtsch. zool Ges., 1, 54–56. (W.L. 22270.)Google Scholar
Li, F.,—1951.— “On two species of free-living nematodes from latrines in Peking which may contaminate improperly collected stool specimens”. Peking nat. Hist. Bull. (1950–1951) IV, 363–373. (English with Chinese abstract.) (W.L. 16081b.)Google Scholar
Linné, C. von, 1767.— “Systema naturae”. Holmiae, vol. 1, pt. 2, pp. 533–1327.Google Scholar
Maupas, É.[F.], 1900.— “Modes et formes de reproduction des nematodes”. Arch. Zool. exp. gén., s. 3, 8, 463–624, pls. 16–26. (W.L. 1915.)Google Scholar
Maupas, É.[F.]. 1915.— “Un nouveau Rhabditis”. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Afr. N., 7, 51–52. (W.L. 5131.)Google Scholar
Maupas, É.[F.], 1916.— “Nouveaux Rhabditis d'Algérie”. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 79, 607–613. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Maupas, É.[F.], 1919.— “Essais d'hybridation chez des nématodes”. Bull, biol., 52, 466–498. (W.L. 3919.)Google Scholar
Mengert, H., 1953.— “Nematoden und Schnecken”. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 41, 311–349. (W.L. 23512a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyl, A. H., 1953a.— “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Nematodenfauna vulkanisch erhitzter Biotope. I. Mitteilung. Die terrikolen Nematoden im Bereich von Fumarolen auf der Insel Ischia”. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 42, 67–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyl, A. H., 1953b.— “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Nematodenfauna vulkanisch erhitzter Biotope. II. Mitteilung”. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 42, 159–208.Google Scholar
Meyl, A. H., 1954.— “Die bisher in Italien gefundenen freilebenden Erd und Süsswasser-Nematoden”. Arch. zool. (ital.), Napoli, 39, 161–264. (W.L. 1949.)Google Scholar
Micoletzky, H., 1914.— “Freilebende Süsswasser—Nematoden der Ost-Alpen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Lunzer Seengebietes”. Zool. Jb., (Abt. 1). 36, 331–546, pls. 9–19. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Micoletzky, H., 1915.— “Neue Süsswasser-Nematoden aus der Bukowina”. Mitt, naturw. Ver. Steierm., 51, 445–454. (W.L. 14069.)Google Scholar
Micoletzky, H., 1922.— “Die freilebenden Erd-Nematoden mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Steiermark und der Bukowina, zugleich mit einer Revision sämtlicher nicht mariner, freilebender Nematoden in Form von Genus-Beschreibungenund Bestimmungsschlusseln”. Arch. Naturgesch., (1921), 87, Abt. A. (8), 1–320; (9), 321–650. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Müller, O. F., 1783.— “Anmerkungen beym Durchlesen einiger Aufsätze in den 10 ersten Stücken des Naturforschers”. Naturforscher, 19, 154–176. (W.L. 14913b.)Google Scholar
Nigon, V., 1949.— “Modalités de la reproduction et déterminisme du sexe chez quelques nématodes libres”. Ann. Sci. nat., (b.)., s. 11, 11, 1–132, 15 pls. (W.L. 915.)Google Scholar
Nigon, V. and Dougherty, E. C., 1949.— “Reproductive patterns and attempts at reciprocal crossing of Rhabditis elegans Maupas, 1900, and Rhabditis briggsae Dougherty and Nigon, 1949 (Nematoda: Rhabditidae)”. J. exp. Zool., 112, 485–503. (W.L. 11191.)Google Scholar
Ogren, R. E., 1953.— “A contribution to the life cycle of Cosmocercoides in snails (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae)”. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 72, 87–91. (W.L. 21400a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örley, L., 1880.— “Az anguillulidák magánrajza. A kir. m. természettudom. társulat által a bugat dijjal jutalmazott pályamü. (Monographic der Anguillulidcn. Eine von der k. ung. naturhistorischen Gescllschaft gekronte Prcisschrift)”. Természetr. Fuz., 4, 16–150; (German text): 154–177; pls. 1–7. (W.L. 21105.)Google Scholar
Örley, L., 1885.— “A rhabditisek magánrajza orvosi és természetrajzi szempontoböl. Hat rajzlappa” Math. term. Közl., 21, 1–134. (W.L. 12771.)Google Scholar
Orley, L., 1886.— “Die Rhabditiden und ihre medicinische Bedeutung”. Berlin, 84 pp. + 6 pls.Google Scholar
Osche, G., 1952.— “Systematik und Phylogenie der Gattung Rhabditis (Nematoda)”. Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1), 81, 190–280. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Osche, G., 1954a.— “Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis mariner Rhabditis-Arten”. Zool. Anz., 152, 242–251. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Osche, G., 1954b.— “Über die gegenwärtig ablaufende Entstehung von Zwillings und Komplementarten bei Rhabditiden (Nematodes). (Fötalisation und Artbildung.)” Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1), 82, 618–654. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Paesler, F., 1941.— “Neue freilebende Erdnematoden aus Ostdeutschland”. Zool. Anz., 134, 245–252. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Pereira, C., 1937.— “Rhabditis hambletoni n. sp., nema apparentemente semiparasito da' bróca do algodoeiro’ (Gasterocercodes brasiliensis)”. Arch. Inst. biol. (Def. agric. anim.), S. Paulo, 8, 217–230. (W.L. 1965c.),Google Scholar
Perroncito, E., 1881.— “L'anemia dei contadini, fornaciai e minatori in rapporto coll'attuale epidemia negli operai del Gottardo”. Ann. Accad. Agric. Torino (1880), 23, 219–410, 6 pls. (W.L. 977.)Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1927.— “On the nomenclature of the vinegar eelworm”. J. Helminth., 5, 133–142. (W.L. 11224c.)Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., 1948.— “Land Mollusca of North America (north of Mexico), Vol. II, part 2”. Monogr. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 3 [vol. 2, pt. 2], ix–xlvii, 521–1113. (W.L. 14447c.)Google Scholar
Potts, F. A., 1910.— “Notes on the free-living nematodes”. Quart. J. micr. Sci., n. s. 55, 433–484. (W.L. 17510.)Google Scholar
Rahm, G., 1925.— “Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Moostierwelt der preussischen Rheinlande. I. Systematisch beschreibender Teil”. Arch. Naturgesch., 90, Abt. A (7). 153–214 (1924). (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Rahm, G., 1928.— “Alguns nematodes parasitas e semi-parasitas das plantas culturaes do Brasil”. Arch. Inst. biol. (Def. agric. anim.), S. Paulo, 1, 239–252. (W.L. 1965c.)Google Scholar
Rahm, G., 1929.— “Nematodes parasitas e semi-parasitas de diversas plantas culturaes do Brasil”. Arch. Inst. biol. (Def. agric. anim.), S. Paulo, 2: 67–136, pls. 13–23.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1893.— “Traité de zoologie médicale et agricole”. Paris, 2nd ed. [fasc. 1], 736 pp. (Date usually given as 1895, when entire volume appeared.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1915.— “L'emplo; des médicaments dans le traitement des maladies causées par des nématodes”. Rep. 10. Int. vet. Congr., 3, 733–753. (W.L. 24024.)Google Scholar
Reiter, M., 1928.— “Zur Systematik und Oekologie der zweigeschlechten Rhabditiden”. Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Innsbruck, 3, 93–184. (W.L. 1682.)Google Scholar
Rühm, W., 1954.— “Einige neue, ipidenspezifische Nematodenarten”. Zool. Anz., 153, 221–242. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Sachs, H., 1949.— “Revision der Bunonematinae (Anguillulidae, Nematodes)”. Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1), 78, 323–366. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Sachs, H., 1950.— “Die Nematoden der Rinderexkremente”. Zool. Jb. (Abt. 1), 79, 209–272.Google Scholar
Schneider, A.[F.], 1859.— “Über eine Nematodenlarve und gewisse Verschieden-heiten in den Geschlechtsorganen der Nematoden”. Z. wiss. Zool., 10, 176–178. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Schneider, A.[F.], 1860.— “Über die Muskeln und Nerven der Nematoden”. Arch. Anat. Physiol., Lpx., 1860, 224–242, pls. 5 and 6 (in part). (W.L. 1739.)Google Scholar
Schneider, A.[F.], 1866.— “Monographic der Nematoden”. Berlin, vi + 357 pp. + 28 plates.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., 1938.— “Freilebende Nematoden der Deutechen Limnologischen Sundaexpedition nach Sumatra, Java und Bali”. Arch. Hydrobiol. (Plankt.) Suppl., 15, 30–108. (W.L. 1769).Google Scholar
Schuurmans Stekhoven, J. H., Jr., 1935.— “Nematoda errantia”. In: Grimpe, G.. (Ed.). Die Tierwelt der Nordund Ostsee, Lieferung XXVIII [Teil V. b], 173 pp.; [Teil V. c] (Literatur), 46–47.Google Scholar
Schuurmans Stekhoven, J. H., Jr., 1951.— “Nématodes saprozoaires et libres du Congo beige”. Mém. Inst. Sci. nat. Belg., s. 2, no. 39, pp. 1–77. (W.L. 13251a.)Google Scholar
Schuurmans Stekhoven, J. H., Jr., 1954.— “Néorhabditis, a new name for Pararhabditis Schuurmans Stekhoven”. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 21, 47. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Shingareva, A. I., Demidova, P. N. and Kudriantsev, V. I., 1928.— “Novyi vid nematody Rhabditis gracilis, obnaruzhennyi u chelovelca. (Neue Art der beim Menschen entdeckten Nematode Rhabditis gracilis.)” Shorn. Posv. 30. nauchn.; vrachebn., ped. i obsh. Deiat. Prof. S. A. Brushteina, pp. 178–197. (Not in W.L.)Google Scholar
Skriabin, K. I., Shikhobalova, N. P., Sobolev, A. A., Paramonov, A. A. and Sudarikov, V. E., 1954.— “Kamallanaty, rabditaty, tilenkhaty, trikhotsefaliaty, dioktofimaty i raspredelenie paraziticheskikh nematod po khoziaevam”. In: Skriabin IC. I. (Ed.), Opredelitel' Parazitiche skikh Nematod, 3, 927 pp.Google Scholar
Skriabin, K. I and Shul'Ts, R.-É.S., 1926.— “Novyi vid Rhabditis cheloveka—Rhabditis schachtiella n. sp. (Eine neue Art Rhabditis aus dem Menschen—Rhabditis schachtiella.)” Robot. 25. soiuz. gel'm. Eksped. Artem. Okrug. Donbassa, 69–72. (Not in W.L.)Google Scholar
Skriabin, K. I., Shul'ts, R.-E.S., AND Serbinov, P. I., 1926.— “Novyi vid Rhabditis cheloveka–Rhabditis donbass n. sp. (Eine neue Art Rhabditis aus dem Menschcn-Rhabditis donbass.)” Robot. 25. soiuz. gel'm. Eksped. Artem. Okrug. Donbassa, 73–77.Google Scholar
Skwarra, E., 1921.— “Diagnosen neuer freilebender Nematoden Ostpreussens”. Zool. Anz., 53, 66–74. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Soós, A., 1938.— “Zwei neue tyrphobionte Nematoden-Arten”. Zool. Anz., 121, 281–286.Google Scholar
Soós, A. 1941.— “Rhabditis carpathicits spec, nov., eine neue in Sphagnum Mooren lebende Nematode”. Fragm. faun, hung., 4, 115–119. (W.L. 86906.)Google Scholar
Southern, R., 1909.— “On the anatomy and life-history of Rhabditis brassicae, n. sp”. J. econ. Biol., 4, 91–95, pl. 8. (W.L. 11170.)Google Scholar
Stefański, W., 1916.— “Die freilebenden Nematoden des Inn, ihre Verbreitung und Systematik. (Fortsetzung.)” Zool. Anz., 46, 369–385. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Stefański, W., 1917.— “Contribution á l'étude de l'excrétion chez les nématodes libres”. Biol. Zbl., 37, 294–311. (W.L. 2981.)Google Scholar
Stefański, W., 1922.— “Excrétion chez les nématodes libres. (Zjawiska wydalnicze u nicieni (Nematodes) w wolnym stanic iyjŐcych.)” Arch. Nauk biol., 1, 33 pp. (French with Polish abstract.) (W.L. 1979eGoogle Scholar
Stefański, W., 1954.— “Rhabditis gingivalis, sp. n., parasite dans un granulome de la gencive chez uncheval”. Acta parasit. polonica (1953), 1,329–336. (Not in W.L.).Google Scholar
Steinbuch, J. G., 1799.— “Das Grasalchen, Vibrio agroslis”. Naturforscher, 28, 233–259. (W.L. 149136.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1929a.— “Diphgaster entomophaga n. sp., a new Diplogaster (Diplogasteridae, Nematodes) found on a Pamphilius stellatus (Christ.) (Tenthredinidae, Hymenoptera.)” Zool. Anz., 80, 143–145. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1929b.— “Rhabditis octopleura n. sp., a new Rhdbditis (Rhabditidae, Nematodes) living in the bark of a diseased elm. (Ulmus americana.)” Zool. Anz., 80, 146–148.Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1933.— “The nematode Cylindrogaster longistoma (Stefanski) Goodey and its relationship”. J. Parasit., 20, 66–68. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1934.— “Some remarks about the nematodes Cephalobits contractus (Cephalobidae) and Diplogaster aerivora (Diplogasteridea). Proc. hel- minth. Soc. Wash., 1, 56–58. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1936a.— “Opuscula miscellanea nematologica. III”. Proc. hel- minth. Soc. Wash., 3, 16–22.Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1936b.— “Opuscula miscellanea nematologica, IV”. Proc. hel- minth. Soc. Wash., 3, 74–80.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., 1942.— “On the culturing of Rhabiditis terrestris n. sp”. Parasitology, 34, 246–252. (W.L. 16035.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A., 1905.— “The determination of generic types, and a list of roundworm genera, with their original and type species”. Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., no. 79, 150 pp. (W.L. 5642.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A., 1920.— “Index-catalogue of medical veterinary zoology. Subject: roundworms (Nematoda, Gordiacea, and Acanthocephah) and the diseases they cause”. Bull. U.S. hyg. Lab., no. 114, 1–881. (W.L. 4295.)Google Scholar
Tadano, M., 1950.— “Namckuji ni kisei suru senchu no ichi-shinshu Rhabditis ikedai n. sp. ni tsuite. (Notes on a new species of parasitic nematode, Rhabditis ikedai n. sp. from the slug, Incillaria confusa Cockarell.)” Dobutsugaku Zasshi (Zool. Mag., Tokyo), 59, 289–291. (Japanese with English summary.) (W.L. 23822c.)Google Scholar
Thorne, G., 1937.— “A revision of the nematode family Cephalobidae Chitwood and Chitwood, 1934”. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 4, 1–16. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L.[P.], 1920.— “Esboço de uma chave geral dos nematodes parasitos”. Rev. Vet.. Rio de J., 10, 59–70 vis. (W.L. 18971.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L.[P.], 1925.— “Contribuções para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica dos batraquios do Brasil”. Sci. vied., Rio de J., 3, 673–687. (W.L. 19965d.)Google Scholar
Van Der Linde, W. J., 1938.— “A contribution to the study of nematodes”. Entomol. Mem. (Dept. Agric. and Forest., U.S. Africa), 2, 1–40.Google Scholar
Vernet, H., 1872.— “Quelqucs mots sur la reproduction de deux espèces hermaphrodites du genre Rhabditis”. Arch. Sci. phys. nat., s. 2, 45, 61–75, pl. 1. (W.L. 1907.)Google Scholar
Volz, J., 1950.— “Die Nematoden der Regenwürmer und aasbesuchunden Käfer”. Zool.Jb. (Abt. 1). 79, 1–70. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Volz, P., 1951.— “Untersuchungen über die Mikrofauna des Waldbodens”. Zool.Jb. (Abt. 1), 79, 514–566.Google Scholar
Watanabe, H., 1920.— “Churan baiyo shiken-chu no kanja funben ni arawaretaru rabujichisu no isshu ni tsuite. (Über eine neue Art Rhabditis im Menschenstuhl.) Dobutsugaku Zasshi (Zool. Mag.. Tokyo). 32, 388–395. (Japanese with German summary.) (W.L. 23822c.)Google Scholar
Watanabe, H., 1927.— “Über eine neue Species Rhabditis, welche im Menschen vorkommt”. Trans. Jap. path. Soc., 17, 215–216. (W.L. 21532.)Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O.[F.B.]. 1876.— “Helminthologische Beobachtungen”. Arch. Naturgesch., 42]., 1, 1–18. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O.[F.B.] 1879.— “Helminthologische Studien”. Arch. Naturgesch., 42]., 45J, 1, 165–188.Google Scholar
Wilkie, J. S., 1930.— “Some parasitic nematodes from Japanese Amphibia”. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., s. 10. 6, 606–614. (W.L. 1050.)Google Scholar
Wollenweber, [H.W.], 1921.— “Beiträge zur Alchenfauna der Kartoffel”. Mitt. Biol. Zent. Anst. Berl., 21, 258–266. (W.L. 13873.)Google Scholar
Wülker, G., 1921.— “Zur Kenntnis der Nematodengattungen Allantonema und Bradynema”. Senckenbergiana, 3, 1–9. (W.L. 20092.)Google Scholar