Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:09:40.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first record of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on Crenimugil buchanani (Teleostei: Muglidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2018

W. Pakdee Open the ORCID record for W. Pakdee [Opens in a new window] ,
K. Ogawa ,
S. Pornruseetriratn ,
U. Thaenkham  and
T. Yeemin
W. Pakdee*
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand Marine Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, Thailand
K. Ogawa
Affiliation:
Meguro Parasitological Museum, Shimomeguro 4-1-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0064, Japan
S. Pornruseetriratn
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand
U. Thaenkham
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand
T. Yeemin
Affiliation:
Marine Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, Thailand
*
Author for correspondence: W. Pakdee, Fax.: +66-2643-5600 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ligophorus satunensis n. sp. was collected from the bluetail mullet, Crenimugil buchanani (Bleeker, 1853), caught off Satun, Thailand, representing the first report of the Ligophorus species in Thailand. The new species is most similar to Ligophorus fenestrum Soo & Lim, 2012 in its fenestrated dorsal hamuli, a ventral bar with a long, bifurcated anteromedian protuberance (AMP) without lateral pieces, and a non-sclerotized vagina. However, it differs from the latter in its dorsal hamuli (up to two layers of fenestrations of the dorsal hamuli in L. satunensis n. sp. vs six layers in L. fenestrum), ventral hamuli (nonfenestrated vs fenestrated), penis (turning a full circle before reaching the genital pore vs turning less than half a circle), and its accessory piece (non-grooved basally and grooved distally vs simply grooved along its entire length). A single specimen, very similar to L. satunensis n. sp., obtained from the same host fish, which can be differentiated from the latter by a considerably shorter AMP of the ventral bar and a smaller and slender dorsal hamuli, is tentatively designated here as Ligophorus sp. Moreover, the phylogenetic trees constructed from the concatenated sequences of partial large-subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (28S) and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) regions support that L. satunensis n. sp. is a new species closely related to L. fenestrum.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 93 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 752 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdallah, VD, de Azevedo, RK and Luque, JL (2009) Four new species of Ligophorus (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) parasitic on Mugil liza (Actinopterygii:Mugilidae) from Guandu River, Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Parasitology 95, 855–864.Google Scholar
Blasco-Costa, I et al. (2012) Molecular phylogeny of species of Ligophorus (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) and their affinities within the Dactylogyridae. Parasitology International 61, 619–627.Google Scholar
Crosetti, D and Blaber, S (2015) Biology, Ecology and Culture of Grey Mullets (Mugilidae). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, EV and Gerasev, PI (1996) Monogenean of the genus Ligophorus (Ancyrocephalidae) parasites of the Black Sea mullets (Mugilidae). Parazitologiya 30, 440–449.Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, EV, Gerasev, PI and Pron'kina, NV (2007) Ligophorus llewellyni n. sp. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from the redlip mullet Liza haematocheilus (Temminck & Schlegel) introduced into the Black Sea from the Far East. Systematic Parasitology 67, 51–64.Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, EV et al. (2012) Descriptions of eight new species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Red Sea mullets. Systematic Parasitology 81, 203–237.Google Scholar
El Hafidi, F et al. (2013a) New species of Ligophorus (Monogenea, Ancyrocephalidae), parasite of Liza spp. (Teleostei, Mugilidae) off the Northwestern African coast. Zoosystema 35, 215–225.Google Scholar
El Hafidi, F et al. (2013b) Ligophorus species (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Mugil cephalus (Teleostei: Mugilidae) off Morocco with the description of a new species and remarks about the use of Ligophorus spp. as biological markers of host population. Folia Parasitologica 60, 433–440.Google Scholar
Euzet, L and Sanfilippo, D (1983) Ligophorus parvicirrus n. sp. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) parasite de Liza ramada (Risso, 1826) (Teleostei, Mugilidae). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 58, 325–335.Google Scholar
Euzet, L and Suriano, DM (1977) Ligophorus n. g. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) parasite des Mugilidae (Téleostéens) en Méditerranée. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Série 3, Zoologie 472, 799–821.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Bargiela, J (1987) Los parasitos de la lisa Mugil cephalus L., en Chile: Sistematica y aspectos poblacionales (Perciformes: Mugilidae). Gayana Zoologica 51, 3–58.Google Scholar
Gusev, AV (1985) Order Dactylogyridea. In Bauer, ON (ed.), Key to Parasites of Freshwater Fish of the Fauna of the USSR. Vol. 2. Parasitic Metazoans. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 15–251.Google Scholar
Hall, TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 4, 95–98.Google Scholar
Hu, Z and Li, D (1992) Two new species of monogenetic trematodes of marine fishes Mugil cephalus from the Chongming Island, Shanghai, China. Journal of Shanghai Teachers University (Natural Sciences) 21, 67–70.Google Scholar
Khang, TF et al. (2016) Monogenean anchor morphometry: systematic value, phylogenetic signal, and evolution. PeerJ 4, e1668.Google Scholar
Kritsky, DC, Khamees, NR and Ali, AH (2013) Ligophorus spp. (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae) parasitizing mullets (Teleostei:Mugilformes: Mugilidae) occurring in the fresh and brackish waters of the Shatt Al-Arah River and Estuary in southern Iraq, with the description of Ligophorus sagmarius sp. n. from the greenback mullet Chelon subviridis (Valenciennes). Parasitology Reseach 112, 4029–4041.Google Scholar
Littlewood, DTJ, Curini-Galletti, M and Herniou, EA (2000) The interrelationships of Proseriata (Platyhelminthes: seriata) flatworms tested with molecules and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16, 449–466.Google Scholar
Lockyer, AE, Olson, PD and Littlewood, DTJ (2003) Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (Platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the cercomer theory. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78, 155–171.Google Scholar
McGinnis, S and Madden, TL (2004) BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 20–25.Google Scholar
Marcotegui, PS and Martorelli, SR (2009) Ligophorus saladensis n. sp. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Mugil platanus Gunther in Samborombón Bay, Argentina. Systematic Parasitology 74, 41–47.Google Scholar
Mariniello, L et al. (2004) Morphometric variability between and within species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Systematic Parasitology 57, 183–190,Google Scholar
Pan, J (1999) Monogenea of marine fishes from Hainan Island V. One new species of the genus Ligophorus from the South China Sea. Zoological Research 20, 186–188.Google Scholar
Posada, D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 1253–1256.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-González, A et al. (2015) Phenotypic plasticity in haptoral structures of Ligophorus cephali (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on the flathead mullet (Mugil cephalus): a geometric morphometric approach. International Journal for Parasitology 45, 295–303.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-González, A et al. (2016) Evolutionary modularity and morphological integration in the haptoral anchor structures of Ligophorus spp. (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae). Parasitology Research 115, 3519–3533.Google Scholar
Rohde, K (1991) Intra- and interspecific interactions in low density populations in resource-rich habitats. Oikos 60, 91–104.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539–542.Google Scholar
Rubtsova, NY et al. (2006) Description and morphometrical variability of a new species of Ligophorus and of Ligophorus chaubaudi (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on Mugil cephalus (Teleostei) from the Mediterranean Basin. Journal of Parasitology 92, 486–495.Google Scholar
Rubtsova, NY, Balbuena, JA and Sarabeev, VL (2007) Three new species of Ligophorus (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on the gills of Mugil cephalus (Teleostei: Mugilidae) from the Japan Sea. Journal of Parasitology 93, 772–780.Google Scholar
Sarabeev, V and Balbuena, JA (2004) Ligophorus pilengas n. sp.from the introduced so-iuy mullet, Mugil soiuy (Teleostei: Mugilidae), in the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea. Journal of Parasitology 90, 222–228.Google Scholar
Sarabeev, VL, Balbuena, JA and Euzet, L (2005) Taxonomic status of Ligophorus mugilinus (Hargis, 1955) (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae), with a description of a new species of Ligophorus from Mugil cephalus (Teleostei: Mugilidae) in the Mediterranean basin. Journal of Parasitology 91, 1444–1451.Google Scholar
Sarabeev, V and Desdevises, Y (2014) Phylogeny of the Atlantic and Pacific species of Ligophorus (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae): morphology vs. molecules. Parasitology International 63, 9–20.Google Scholar
Sarabeev, V et al. (2013) Taxonomic revision of the Atlantic and Pacific species of Ligophorus (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) from mullets (Teleostei, Mugilidae) with the proposal of a new genus and description of four new species. Vestnik Zoologii 28, 1–112.Google Scholar
Siquier, FG and Nunez, OM (2009) Ligophorus uruguayense sp. nov. (Monogenea, Ancyrocephalidae), a gill parasite from Mugil platanus (Mugiliformes, Mugilidae) in Uruguay. Acta Parasitologica 54, 95–102.Google Scholar
Soo, OYM and Lim, LHS (2012) Eight new species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from mugilids off Peninsular Malaysia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 60, 241–264.Google Scholar
Soo, OYM and Lim, LHS (2015) A description of two new species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Malaysian mugilid fishes using principal component analysis and numerical taxonomy. Journal of Helminthology 89, 131–149.Google Scholar
Soo, OYM, Tan, WB and Lim, LHS (2015) Three new species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Moolgarda buchanani (Bleeker) off Johor, Malaysia based on morphological, morphometric and molecular data. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 63, 49–65Google Scholar
Swofford, D (2001) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods), version 4.0 beta. Sinauar Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Tamura, K et al. (2014) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 2725–2729.Google Scholar
Thompson, JD et al. (1997) The Clustal_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24, 4876–4882.Google Scholar
Turan, C et al. (2011) Systematic status of nine mullet species (Mugilidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 11, 315–321.Google Scholar
Zhang, JY, Yang, TB and Liu, L (2001) Monogeneans of Chinese Marine Fishes. Beijing, China: Agriculture Press.Google Scholar