Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:56:58.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Favored RLE for Axenic Culture of Neoaplectana glaseri

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Norman R. Stoll
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller Institute, New York

Extract

Favored RLE for use in promoting growth and development of Neoaplectana glaseri in axenic cultures include those made from the livers of rabbits sacrificed late in pregnancy or early postpartum, and used after subsequent refrigerated storage periods of 15–90 days.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glaser, R. W., 1940.—“The bacteria-free culture of a nematode parasite.Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., 43, 512514. (W.L. 16913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1951.—“Axenic Neoaplectana glaseri in fluid cultures.J. Parasit., 37, 18. (W.L. 11428).Google Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1953a.—“Axenic cultivation of the parasitic nematode, Neoaplectana glaseri, in a fluid medium containing raw liver extract.Ibidem, 39, 422444.Google Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1953b.—“Continued infectivity for Japanese beetle grubs of Neoaplectana glaseri (Nematoda) after seven years axenic culture.” Thapar Commemoration Volume, Lucknow, 259268.Google Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1954a.—“Improved yields in axenic fluid cultures of Neoaplectana glaseri (Nematoda).J. Parasit., 40, 14. (W.L. 11428).Google Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1954b.—“Further progress in the axenic cultivation in fluid media of Neoaplectana glaseri, a parasitic nematode.Anat. Rec., 120, 745746. (W.L. 763).Google Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1959.—“Conditions favoring the axenic culture of Neoaplectana glaseri, a nematode parasite of certain insect grubs.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 77, 126136. (W.L. 1051).CrossRefGoogle Scholar