Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:21:13.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equal partnership: two trematode species, not one, manipulate the burrowing behaviour of the New Zealand cockle, Austrovenus stutchburyi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

C. Babirat
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
K.N. Mouritsen
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
R. Poulin*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +64 3 479-7584, Email , [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Metacercariae of the trematode Curtuteria australis (Echinostomatidae) accumulate in the foot of the New Zealand cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi, severely impairing the cockle's ability to burrow under the sediments. This results in increased predation by birds on cockles, and thus enhanced transmission rates of the parasite to its bird definitive hosts. This host manipulation by the trematode is costly: fish regularly crop the tip of the foot of cockles stranded on the sediment surface, killing any metacercariae they ingest. A second, previously undetected trematode species (characterized by 23 collar spines) co-existing with C. australis, has been found in the foot of cockles in the Otago Harbour, South Island, New Zealand. The relative abundance of the two species varies among localities, with the identity of the numerically dominant species also changing from one locality to the next. Both C. australis and the new species have a strong preference for encysting in the tip of the cockle's foot, where their impact on the burrowing ability of the host is greatest, and where they both face the risk of cropping by fish. Results indicate that these two species are ecological equivalents, and their combined numbers determine how the cockle population is affected.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

References

Adema, C.M. & Loker, E.S. (1997) Specificity and immunobiology of larval digenean–snail associations. pp. 230253 in Fried, B. & Graczyk, T.K. (Eds) Advances in trematode biology. Boca Raton, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Allison, F.R. (1979) Life cycle of Curtuteria australis n. sp. (Digenea: Echinostomatidae: Himasthlinae), intestinal parasite of the South Island pied oystercatcher. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A.D. (2001) Dynamics of aggregations of a gastropod predator/scavenger on a New Zealand harbour beach. Journal of Molluscan Studies 67, 329341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A.O., Heard, R.W. & Overstreet, R.M. (1993) Intermediate hosts as source communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 13581363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, C. (1991) Ethological aspects of parasite transmission. American Naturalist 138, 866880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, C. (2001) Parasitism: the ecology and evolution of intimate interactions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, S.W.B. (1997) Excystation and cultivation of trematodes. pp. 5786 in Fried, B. & Graczyk, T.K. (Eds) Advances in trematode biology. Boca Raton, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, S.W.B., McKerr, G., Judge, B.C. & Moran, I. (1984) Studies on metacercarial excystment in Himasthla leptosoma (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) and newly emerged metacercariae. International Journal for Parasitology 14, 415421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, K.D., Thomas, F. & Poulin, R. (2000) Evolution of host phenotype manipulation by parasites and its consequences. pp. 117127 in Poulin, R., Morand, S. & Skorping, A. (Eds) Evolutionary biology of host-parasite relationships: theory meets reality. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lauckner, G. (1983) Diseases of Mollusca: Bivalvia. pp. 477961 in Kinne, O. (Ed.) Diseases of marine animals, vol. 2. Hamburg, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland.Google Scholar
Lepitzki, D.A.W., Scott, M.E. & McLaughlin, J.D. (1994) Influence of storage and examination methods on the recovery and size of metacercariae of Cyathocotyle bushiensis and Sphaeridotrema pseudoglobulus (Digenea). Journal of Parasitology 80, 454460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcfarland, L.H., Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003) From first to second and back to first intermediate host: the unusual transmission route of Curtuteria australis (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Journal of Parasitology 89, 625628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. (2002) Parasites and the behavior of animals. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, K.N. (2001) Hitch-hiking parasite: a dark horse may be the real rider. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 14171420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouritsen, K.N. (2002) The parasite-induced surfacing behaviour in the cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi: a test of an alternative hypothesis and identification of potential mechanisms. Parasitology 124, 521528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003a) The risk of being at the top: foot-cropping in the New Zealand cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 497498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003b) Parasite-induced trophic facilitation exploited by a non-host predator: a manipulator's nightmare. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 10431050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003c) The mud flat anemone–cockle association: mutualism in the intertidal zone? Oecologia 135, 131137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (1995) "Adaptive" changes in the behaviour of parasitized animals: a critical review. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 13711383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (1998) Evolutionary ecology of parasites: from individuals to communities. 212 pp. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. & Poulin, R. (1998) Manipulation of a mollusc by a trophically transmitted parasite: convergent evolution or phylogenetic inheritance? Parasitology 116, 431436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, F., Mete, K., Helluy, S., Santalla, F., Verneau, O., de Meeüs, T., Cézilly, F. & Renaud, F. (1997) Hitch-hiker parasites or how to benefit from the strategy of another parasite. Evolution 51, 13161318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, F., Renaud, F. & Poulin, R. (1998) Exploitation of manipulators: ‘hitch-hiking’ as a parasite transmission strategy. Animal Behaviour 56, 199206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed