Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T00:22:04.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology of Toxascaris leonina infection post-weaning within a colony of dogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

M.A. Fisher
Affiliation:
Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, Kent, CT13 9NJ, UK
M.G. Murphy
Affiliation:
RBK House, Irishtown, Athlone, Co. West Meath, Ireland
E.M. Siedek*
Affiliation:
RBK House, Irishtown, Athlone, Co. West Meath, Ireland
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +44 (01304) 65 62 57 Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This communication reports incidental observations on Toxascaris leonina infections in a beagle breeding colony. Regular faecal monitoring demonstrated that T. leonina was endemic in the adult dam population within this colony. Small numbers of T. leonina eggs were also detected in the faeces of weaned pups from eight weeks of age possibly produced by a patent infection. This would mean a pre-patent period for T. leonina of 56 days or less. Worm counts on 10 pups showed that 60% of pups had acquired a T. leonina infection by 12 weeks of age. Since prenatal and lactogenic transmission do not occur and as the pups were kept in an environment which reduced chances of infection with T. leonina and there was no apparent source of paratenic hosts, the source of infection must have been embryonated T. leonina eggs from the whelping environment. These observations on T. leonina demonstrate that, if pups are exposed to an infected environment, patent infections may be seen in a younger age group than is normally associated with T. leonina infections.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

References

Georgi, J.R. & Georgi, M.E. (1991) Canine clinical parasitology. 227 pp. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D.E., Pilkington, J.G. & Reid, J.F.S. (1988) Evaluation of the efficacy of oxfendazole against larval and adult Toxascaris leonina in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Practice 29, 525530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okoshi, S. & Usui, M. (1968) Experimental studies on Toxascaris leonina V. Experimental infection of dogs and cats with eggs of canine, feline and Felidae strains. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 30, 8191.Google ScholarPubMed
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982) Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. London, Balliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Sprent, J.F.A. (1959) The life history and development of Toxascaris leonina (von Linstow 1902) in the dog and cat. Parasitology 49, 330371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J.F.A. & English, P.B. (1958) The large roundworms of dogs and cats–a public health problem. Australian Veterinary Journal 35, 161171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar