Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:43:30.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of the prevalence of Heligmosomum costellatum (Heligmosomidae: Trichostrongyloidea) in a common vole population in southern Moravia, Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2010

E. Janova ,
M. Skoric ,
M. Heroldova ,
F. Tenora ,
P. Fictum  and
I. Pavlik
E. Janova
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Kvetna 9, 603 65Brno, Czech Republic
M. Skoric
Affiliation:
Institute of Pathological Morphology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackeho 1/3, 612 42Brno, Czech Republic
M. Heroldova
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Kvetna 9, 603 65Brno, Czech Republic
F. Tenora
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Kvetna 9, 603 65Brno, Czech Republic
P. Fictum
Affiliation:
Institute of Pathological Morphology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackeho 1/3, 612 42Brno, Czech Republic
I. Pavlik*
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00Brno, Czech Republic
*
*Fax: +420 5 4121 1229 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study of nematode (Heligmosomum costellatum) prevalence in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) population was performed in 2002 and 2003 in an agricultural region of southern Moravia, Czech Republic. The influence of the trapping date, body weight, age, gender and reproduction of the common vole on the prevalence of the larvae of H. costellatum encapsulated in the stomach wall was examined. Of 503 common voles examined, 27.6% were H. costellatum positive. The prevalence of H. costellatum in the common vole population was influenced mainly by the weight, trapping date, year and reproductive state, as well as by the interactions between year and gender and between year and reproductive state. The influence of age was weak. The most infected common vole groups were the older, heavier and already reproducing females captured from April to August and all voles captured in 2002. In general, parasite prevalence seems to be dependent on the population parameters of the host species. However, the H. costellatum prevalence study in a single common vole population was not sufficient to fully describe and explain the nematode–host interactions.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 84 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 410 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyce, C.C.K. & Boyce, J.L. (1988a) Population biology of Microtus arvalis. III. Regulation of numbers and breeding dispersion of females. Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 737–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, C.C.K. & Boyce, J.L. (1988b) Population biology of Microtus arvalis. I. Lifetime reproductive success of solitary and grouped breeding females. Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E.D., Macdonald, D.W., Tew, T.E. & Todd, I.A. (1994) Apodemus sylvaticus infected with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in an arable ecosystem: epidemiology and effects of infection on the movements of male mice. Journal of Zoology 234, 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, G. (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. 234 pp. London, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Erhardova, B. (1958) [Parasitic worms of Czechoslovakian rodents]. Ceskoslovenska Parasitologie 5, 27–103(in Czech).Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (1972) The incidence of the nematode Heligmosomum mixtum Schultz, 1954 in Czechoslovakia. Vestnik Ceskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke 3, 179–180.Google Scholar
Heroldova, M., Janova, E., Bryja, J. & Tkadlec, E. (2005) Set-aside plots – source of small mammal pests? Folia Zoologica 54, 337–350.Google Scholar
Holisova, V. & Kocis, M.K. (1955) Recognition of endoparasitic worms in murine rodents in Moravia. Acta Academiae Scientiarum Cechoslovaca Brunensis 10, 483–498.Google Scholar
Janova, E., Nesvadbova, J. & Tkadlec, E. (2007a) Is the eye lens method of age estimation reliable in voles? Folia Zoologica 56, 119–125.Google Scholar
Janova, E., Havelkova, D. & Tkadlec, E. (2007b) Does reproduction accelerate the growth of eye lens mass in female voles? Belgian Journal of Zoology 137, 85–88.Google Scholar
Janova, E., Heroldova, M. & Bryja, J. (2008) Conspicuous demographic and individual changes in a population of the common vole in a set-aside alfalfa field. Annales Zoologici Fennici 45, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisielewska, K. & Zubczewska, Z. (1973) Intestinal helminths as indexes of reproduction dynamics in the host population – common vole. Acta Theriologica 18, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackin-Rogalska, R. (1979) Elements of the spatial organization of a common vole population. Acta Theriologica 24, 171–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, J. (1980) Morphometric variability in a population of the root vole. Acta Theriologica 25, 155–211.Google Scholar
N'Zobadila, G., Boyer, J. & Durette-Dess, M.C. (1996) Morphogenèse d'Heligmosomoides polygyrus polygyrus (Dujardin, 1845) (Trichostrongylina, Heligmosomoidea) chez Apodemus flavicollis en France. Comparaison avec les espèces proches: Heligmosomoides laevis (Dujardin, 1845) et Heligmosomum mixtum Schulz, 1954, parasites d'Arvicolidae. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 18, 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopic, J. (1972) Biocenotical study on Cestodes of small mammals in various biotopes. Acta Scientiarum Naturae Brunensis 6, 1–68.Google Scholar
Prokopic, J. (1973) Biocenotic relationship among helminths of Microtus arvalis and their changes in various biotopes and seasons. Vestnik Ceskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke 37, 37–55.Google Scholar
Rosicky, B. (1959) [Parasites in common vole in Czechoslovakia]. pp. 180–195in Kratochvil, J. (Ed.) [Common vole Microtus arvalis]. Prague, ČSAV (in Czech).Google Scholar
Tenora, F. (1972) Notes on the analysis of helmintho-fauna of the common vole Microtus arvalis (Pall.). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Brunensis, series A 20, 655–666.Google Scholar
Tenora, F. (1976) [Composition of helmintho-fauna of Microtus arvalis in various biotopes]. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne 22, 399–401(in Polish).Google Scholar
Tenora, F. & Zejda, J. (1974) The helminth synusy of Clethrionomys glareolus in a lowland forest and its changes. Acta Scientiarum Naturae Brunensis 8, 1–48.Google Scholar
Tenora, F., Barus, V., Hildebrand, J. & Prokes, M. (2002) The species of genus Heligmosomum Railliet et Henry, 1909 (Nematoda, Heligmosominae) parasitizing Rodentia in Europe. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis L5, 7–14.Google Scholar
Zejda, J. (1971) Differential growth of three cohorts of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus, Schreb. 1780. Zoologicke Listy 20, 229–245.Google Scholar
Zejda, J. (1992) The weight growth of the water vole (Arvicola terrestris) under natural conditions. Folia Zoologica 41, 213–219.Google Scholar
Zejda, J., Zapletal, M., Pikula, J., Obdrzalkova, D., Heroldova, M. & Hubalek, Z. (2002) [Rodents in agricultural and forestry practice]. 284 pp. Prague, Agrospoj Press (in Czech).Google Scholar