Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:29:00.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Density-dependent effects on the survival and growth of the rodent stomach worm Protospirura muricola in laboratory mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

F.M. Lowrie
Affiliation:
School of Biology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
J.M. Behnke*
Affiliation:
School of Biology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
C.J. Barnard
Affiliation:
School of Biology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 0115 951 3252 Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The spirurid nematode, Protospirura muricola, is of intrinsic interest as a rodent model of gastric nematode infections. Since worm burdens can be very heavy in nature, density dependent processes may constrain parasite growth. Laboratory mice (BKW) were exposed to varying doses of infective larvae of P. muricola in the range 5 to 40 third-stage larvae (L3), in four separate experiments in which progressively higher doses were utilized. All mice were culled 60 days after infection and a total of 518 worms (226 male and 292 female worms) was recovered, measured and weighed. Overall survival was 58.9%, but survival declined significantly with increasing dose by approximately 21% (from 66% at 5 L3 per mouse to 52% at 40 L3 per mouse). The length and weight of worms correlated positively in both sexes. Total worm biomass increased linearly with increasing numbers of worms. However, whilst the length and weight of male worms declined with increasing worm burden (8.4 and 24.6% respectively), female worms were less affected, only length showing a significant reduction with increasing parasite burden (16.0%). Therefore, increasing worm burdens impeded growth of P. muricola, but reduction in length and weight were relatively small in relation to the overall size of this nematode. Increasing worm burdens were associated with loss of host weight and reduction in stomach weight and worm burdens in excess of 20 exerted a measurable cost to the host, which in the field, may be associated with loss of overall host fitness.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

References

Anderson, R.M. May, R.M. (1978) Regulation and stability of host–parasite population interactions I. Regulatory processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 219247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreassen, J., Bennet-Jenkins, E.M. Bryant, C. (1999) Immunology and biochemistry of Hymenolepis diminuta . Advances in Parasitology 42: 223275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnard, C.J., Sayed, E., Barnard, L.E., Behnke, J.M., Abdel Nabi, I., Sherif, N., Shutt, A. Zalat, S. (2003) Local variation in helminth burdens of Egyptian spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus dimidiatus) from ecologically similar sites: relationships with hormone concentrations and social behaviour. Journal of Helminthology 77: 197209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baylis, H.A. (1928) On a collection of nematodes from Nigerian mammals (chiefly rodents). Parasitology 20: 280304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, J.M., Barnard, C.J., Mason, N., Harris, P.D., Sherif, N.E., Zalat, S. Gilbert, F.S. (2000) Intestinal helminths of spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus dimidatus) from St Katherine's Protectorate in the Sinai, Egypt. Journal of Helminthology 74: 3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A.O. Lotz, J.M. (2000) The ecology of “crowding”. Journal of Parasitology 86: 212213.Google ScholarPubMed
Campos, M.Q. Vargas, M.V. (1977) Biologia de Protospirura muricola Gedoelst, 1916 y Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790) (Nematoda: Spiruridae), en Costa Rica, I. Huespedes intermediarios. Revista de Biologia Tropical 25: 191207.Google Scholar
Campos, M.Q. Vargas, M.V. (1978) Biologia de Protospirura muricola Gedoelst, 1916 y Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790) (Nematoda: Spiruridae), en Costa Rica, II. Huespedes definitivos. Revista de Biologia Tropical 26: 199211.Google Scholar
Castro, G.A. (1990) Intestinal pathology. pp. 283316 in Behnke, J.M. (Ed.) Parasites: immunity and pathology. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.C. (1939) The effect of number and age of worms on development of primary and secondary infections with Hymenolepis diminuta in rats and an investigation into the nature of premunition in tapeworm infections. American Journal of Hygiene 29: 105114.Google Scholar
Foster, A.O. Johnson, C.M. (1939) A preliminary note on the identity, life cycle and pathogenicity of an important nematode parasite of captive monkeys. American Journal of Tropical Medicine 19: 265277.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.R. & Behnke, J.M. (2001) Intraspecific competition in the cestode, Hymenolepis diminuta in rats. pp. 161165 in Halton, D.W., Behnke, J.M. & Marshall, I. (Eds) Practical exercises in parasitology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymer, A. (1982) Density dependent mechanisms in the regulation of intestinal helminth populations. Parasitology 84: 573587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, E. Bundy, D.A.P. (1989) Density dependence in establishment, growth and worm fecundity in intestinal helminthiasis: the population biology of Trichuris muris (Nematoda) infection in CBA/Ca mice. Parasitology 98: 451458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, G.E. (1971) The nature of the immune response of the mouse to the bile duct cestode Hymenolepis microstoma . Parasitology 62: 285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norozian-Amiri, S.M.B. Behnke, J.M. (1994) Density dependent regulation of the growth of the hookworms Necator americanus and Ancylostoma ceylanicum . Parasitology 109: 119128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, S. Viney, M.E. (2002) Host immune responses are necessary for density dependence in nematode infections. Parasitology 125: 283292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quentin, J.C. (1969) Cycle biologique de Protospirura muricola Gedoelst 1916 (Nematoda; Spiruridae). Annales de Parasitologie 44: 485504.Google Scholar
Read, C.P. (1951) The “crowding” effect in tapeworm infections. Journal of Parasitology 37: 174178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L.S. (2000) The crowding effect revisited. Journal of Parasitology 86: 209211.Google ScholarPubMed