Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T07:50:08.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of the Common Poultry Ascarid by Treating the Soil with Sodium Pentachlorophenate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

G. C. Shelton ,
J. M. Magner  and
P. H. Santmyer
G. C. Shelton*
Affiliation:
Columbia, Missouri
J. M. Magner
Affiliation:
Columbia, Missouri
P. H. Santmyer*
Affiliation:
Columbia, Missouri
*
* Department of Veterinary Bacteriology and Parasitology. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri.
** Organic Division, Monsanto Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Chicken pens previously infested with eggs of Ascaridia lineata were sprayed with formulations containing sodium pentachlorophenate, an alkyl polyamine, and 2-benzyl-4-chlorophenol.

Six-week-old chickens were placed in the treated pens for eight days, then sacrificed. The larval ascarids recovered from the intestines were counted.

The ovicidal activity of sodium pentachlorophenate was manifest by almost 65% reduction of worm burden which developed in susceptible young chickens. The other compounds investigated appeared to be relatively ineffective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 32 , Issue 1-2 , August 1958 , pp. 45 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackert, J. E. and Nolf, L. O., 1929.—“The new technique for collecting intestinal roundvvorms.” Science, 70, 310–311. (W.L. 19938).Google Scholar
Alicata, J. E., 1953.—“Observations on the lethal action of polyborate on swine kidney worm (Stephamirus dentattts) larvae in soil.” Amer. J. vet. Res., 14, 563–570. (W.L. 028a).Google Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1952.—“The Parasites of Domestic Animals.” 2nd Ed., J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Edgar, S. A., AND King, D. F., 1955.—“The effectiveness of methyl bromide in sterilizing poultry litter.” Poult. Sci., 34, 595–597. (W.L. 16421).Google Scholar
Farr, M. M., 1956.—“Survival of the protozoan parasite Histomonas meleagridis, in feces of infected birds.” Cornell Vet., 46, 178–187. (W.L. 6888).Google Scholar
Hoerlein, B. F., 1951.—“Further studies on the chemical treatment of soil infected with larvae of the dog hookworm.” Vet. Med., 46, 350–355. (W.L. 22520).Google Scholar
Izumi, Seiichi, 1953.—“Biological studies on Ascaris eggs. IV. Ascaris ontogenesis observed by nucleic acid stainings, and distribution of fat or glycogen following the development of Ascaris eggs.” Jap. J. med. Sci. Biol., 6, 371–383.Google Scholar
Izumi, Seiichi, 1953.—“Biological studies on Ascaris eggs. V. On the staining reactions of Ascaris eggs to Phosphor, Calcium and some other substances in the process of their oögenesis.” Jap. J. med. Sci. Biol., 6, 385–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaskoski, B. J., 1953.—“Age resistance of swine Ascarid eggs.” Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 72, 179–184. (W.L. 21400).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Takeshi, 1952.—(Distribution and behaviour of eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides in the nature. o I. Report. The occurrence of eggs in the farm soil their various seasons, with a reference to an experimental investigation on their development therein.) Osaka Daigoku Igakiu Zassi, 4, 125–132 (In Japanese : English summary p. 125).Google Scholar
Taylor, A. L., Andrews, J. S., AND Swanson, L. E., 1943.—“Fumigation of soil with methyl bromide as a means of destroying infective stages and intermediate hosts of some internal parasites of mammals.” Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 10, 4–6. (W.L. 16747a).Google Scholar