Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:35:38.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Two Geographical Strains of Schistosoma mansoni in Rhesus Monkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

G. S. Nelson  and
M. F. A. Saoud
G. S. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
M. F. A. Saoud
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Six rhesus monkeys were exposed to 750 cercariae of a Puerto Rican strain of S. mansoni and six to the same dose of a Tanzanian strain.

2. The Puerto Rican strain proved to be much more pathogenic and during the early stages of the infection the animals infected with this strain were obviously more severely affected than the Mwanza strain animals; two died only two weeks after eggs appeared in the faeces.

3. With the Puerto Rican strain there was a shorter prepatent period and a highly significant difference in the infectivity as determined by the worm recovery. The mean maturation rate was 81% in the two fatal infections and 63·5% in the four remaining monkeys as compared with a mean of 45·9% in the 6 monkeys infected with the Tanzanian strain.

4. There were also differences in the pattern of egg output in the faeces with higher densities with the Puerto Rican strain in the initial stages but lower densities in the later stages of the infection. But it was noted that faecal egg output was a poor index of the severity of the infection. In the severely ill monkeys the faecal egg output expressed as the total egg output in 24 hours was very misleading because the affected animals had poor appetites and they passed very small quantities of blood stained mucus containing very little faecal material.

5. Tissue egg counts were far more reliable as was shown in a preliminary experiment where during a period of one week approximately 100,000 eggs were excreted in the faeces as compared with more than a million eggs retained in the tissues.

6. Details are given of the egg densities in the various organs of the monkeys. The most important difference between the two strains was the number of eggs in the liver with a mean of 1,222 eggs per g. in the Puerto Rican strain monkeys as compared with only 158·5 eggs per g. with the Mwanza strain.

7. Both groups of monkeys developed a marked lowering of the haemoglobin levels but this was not a strain characteristic and the severity was not related to the tissue egg densities. There was raised white count which reached the highest level at the time when the haemoglobin levels were at their lowest. There was an increase in the eosinophilic count in some of the animals but again this was not a strain characteristic. There was no eosinophilia in the two animals that died.

8. Fluorescent antibody levels were recorded at different stages of the infection together with the blood protein levels. The F.A. titres were at the highest levels in the acute stages of the disease. There was a significant correlation between the peak F.A. titres and the eosinophil levels in the blood. The percentage of gamma globulins in the sera showed a peak at the end of the period of observation when the F.A. titres were decreasing.

9. These observations support the clinical impression of the relatively low pathogenicity of S. mansoni in Tanzania and other parts of Central and East Africa as compared with Egypt and South America. However, the inherent pathogenicity of the strain may not be the most important factor in accounting for the differences in the epidemiology. Differences in the reaction of the human population and in the intensity of transmission are probably equally important. In Africa there is also the possibility that in some areas worm loads are reduced due to the heterologous immunity that is acquired as a result of repeated exposure to the prevalent “nonpathogenic” schistosomes of domestic and wild animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 42 , Issue 3-4 , September 1968 , pp. 339 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aly, A. M., 1961.—“Hypersplenism and bilharziasis.” J. Egypt. med. Ass., 44, 800–805.Google ScholarPubMed
Amin, M. A.Nelson, G. S. and Saoud, M. F. A., 1968.—“Studies on heterologous immunity in schistosomiasis. II. Heterologous immunity in rhesus monkeys.” Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 38, 19–27.Google Scholar
Awny, A. Y., 1944.—“On anaemia in bilharzial cirrhosis with splenomegaly.” J. roy. Egypt. med. Ass., 27, 303–314.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. I., Warren, K. S. and Sadun, E. H., 1963.—“Observations on the pathophysiology of Schistosomiasis mansoni in monkeys.” Expl Parasit., 13, 194–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheever, A. W., 1965.—“A comparative study of Schistosoma mansoni infections in mice, gerbils, multimammate rats and hamsters.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 14, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, D. E., 1965.—“Anaemia in mice infected with gamma-irradiated Schistosoma mansoni.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 14, 996–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farid, Z., Bassily, S., Schulert, A. R., Raasch, F., Zeind, A. S., Booby, A. S. El, and Sherif, M., 1967.—“Blood loss in chronic Schistosoma mansoni infection in Egyptian farmers.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 61, 621–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Files, V. S., 1951.—“A study of the vector-parasite relationships in Schistosoma mansoni.” Parasitology, 41, 264–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girges, R., 1934.—“Schistosomal anaemia in Egypt.” J. med. Ass., Egypt, 17, 273–284.Google Scholar
Hsu, H. F. and Hsu, S. Y. L., 1956.—“On the infectivity of the Formosan strain of Schistosoma japonicum in Macaques.” Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 5, 136–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, H. F. and Hsu, S. Y. L., 1960.—“Distribution of eggs in different geographic strains of Schistosoma japonicum in the viscera of infected hamsters and mice.” Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 9, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jachowski, L. A. Jr., Anderson, R. I. and Sadun, E. H., 1963.—“Serologic reactions to Schistosoma mansoni. I. Quantitative studies on experimentally infected monkeys (Macaca mulatta).” Am. J. Hyg., 77, 137–145.Google Scholar
Jamra, M., Maspes, V. and Meira, D. A., 1964.—“Types and mechanisms of anaemia in Schistosomaisis mansoni.” Rev. Inst. Med. trop. Sao Paulo, 6, 126–136.Google Scholar
Jordan, P., 1961.—“Schistosoma haematobium infection in a Sukuma village, Tanganyika.” Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 25, 695–699.Google Scholar
Jordan, P., and Goatly, K. D., 1966.—“Experimental schistosomiasis in primates in Tanzania. I. A preliminary note on the susceptibility of Cercopithecus aethiops centralis to infection with Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma mansoni.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 60, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloetzel, K. and Lewart, R. M., 1966.—“Pigment formation in S. mansoni infection in white mouse.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 15, 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisenhelder, J. E. and Thompson, P. E., 1963.—“Comparative studies on experimental Schistosoma mansoni infections in African green and rhesus monkeys.” J. Parasit., 49, 567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, R. and Pons, J., 1936.—“Hematological studies on Schistosoma mansoni in Puerto Rico.” Puerto Rico J. Publ. Hlth trop. Med., 11, 369–400.Google Scholar
Nasser, S. S. H., 1967.—The inter-relationship between protein-calorie deficiency, parasitic infestation and anaemia. Thesis submitted in part fulfilment for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Medicine, University of London. Human Nutrition Research Unit, Mill Hill and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. London. June, 1967. 1–239.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S., 1958.—“Schistosoma mansoni infection in the West Nile District of Uganda. Part IV. Anaemia and S. mansoni infection.” E. Afr. med. J., 35, 581–585.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S., 1959.—“Schistosoma mansoni infection in the West Nile District of Uganda. V. Host-parasite relationships.” E. Afr. med. J., 36 29–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., and Saoud, M. F. A., 1966.—“The daily egg output of Schistosoma mansoni in rhesus monkeys.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 60, 429–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. S., Amin, M. A., Saoud, M. F. A. and Teesdale, C., 1968.—“Studies on heterologus immunity in schistosomiasis. I. Heterologous schistosome immunity in mice.” Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 38, 9–17.Google Scholar
Pessoa, S. B. and de Oliveira Coutinho, J., 1952.—“Contribution to the study of the blood picture in schistosomiasis mansoni. I. Anemia.” Folia clin. Biol., 18, 189–191.Google Scholar
Pessoa, S. B. and de Oliveira Coutinho, J., 1952.—“Contribution to the study of the blood picture in schistosomiasis mansoni. II. White blood cell count.” Folia clin. Biol., 18, 199–205.Google Scholar
Sadun, E. H., 1963.—“Seminar on immunity to parasitic helminths. VII. Fluorescent antibody technique for helminth infections.” Expl Parasit., 13, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadun, E. H., Anderson, R. I. and Williams, J. S., 1962.—“The nature of fluorescent antibody reactions in infections and artificial immunizations with Schistosoma mansoni.” Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 27, 151–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Sadun, E. H., Williams, J. S. and Anderson, R. I., 1960.—“Fluorescent antibody technic for sero-diagnosis of schistosomiasis in humans.” Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 105, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saif, M., 1959.—“The hemoglobin level in parasitic disease.” J. Egypt. med. Ass., 42, 578–582.Google Scholar
Saoud, M. F. A., 1964.—“Susceptibilities of some planorbids to infection with two strains of Schistosoma mansoni from Aden and St. Lucia.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 58, 288–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saoud, M. F. A., 1965.—“Susceptibilities of various snail intermediate hosts of Schistosoma mansoni to different strains of the parasite.” J. Helminth., 39, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saoud, M. F. A., 1966.—“The infectivity and pathogenicity of geographical strains of Schistosoma mansoni.” Trans. R. Soc. trop Med. Hyg., 60, 585–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithers, S. R. and Terry, R. J., 1965.—“Naturally acquired resistance of Schistosoma mansoni in the rhesus monkey.” Parasitology, 55, 701–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithers, S. R. and Terry, R. J., 1965a.—“The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of adult worms.” Parasitology, 55, 701–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirewalt, M. A. and Fregeau, W. A., 1965.—“Effect of selected experimental conditions on penetration and maturation of Schistosoma mansoni in mice. I. Environmental.” Expl Parasit., 17, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, H., 1941.—“Infektionsversuche an verschiedenen Bilharzia-Zwischenwirten mit einem einzelnen Mirazidium von Bilharzia mansoni und B. japonica.” Zbl. Bakt., 148, 29–35.Google Scholar
Vogel, H., and Minning, W., 1953.—“The acquired resistance of Macaca rhesus to Schistosoma japonicum.” Z. Tropenmed. Parasit., 4, 418–505.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, A. R. P., Fletcher, D. C. and Traill, V., 1954.—“An investigation of the hemoglobin concentration and of blood loss in stools in adult South African Bantu infested with intestinal Schistosoma mansoni.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 48, 501–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, K. S., 1967.—“A comparison of Puerto Rican, Brazilian, Egyptian and Tanzanian strains of Schistosoma mansoni in mice: penetration of cercariae, maturation of schistosomes and production of liver disease.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 61, 795–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodruff, A. W., Shafei, A. Z., Awwad, H. K., Pettitt, L. E. and Abaza, H. H., 1966.—“Anaemia in patients with schistosomiasis and gross splenomegaly.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 60, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, C. A. and Bennett, M. S., 1966.—“Studies on Schistosoma haematobium in the laboratory. I. A strain from Durban, Natal, South Africa. II. A strain from South Arabia.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg.. 61, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar