Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:47:03.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the Infectivity and Pathogenicity of six species of African Schistosomes and their Hybrids 2. Baboons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

M. G. Taylor ,
G. S. Nelson ,
Mary Smith  and
B. J. Andrews
M. G. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, St. Albans, Herts.
G. S. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, St. Albans, Herts.
Mary Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, St. Albans, Herts.
B. J. Andrews
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, St. Albans, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The behaviour of six species of African schistosomes and their hybrids has been compared qualitatively and quantitatively in baboons, with a view to finding a schistosome of high infectivity but low pathogenicity to the baboon for use in heterologous immunity experiments. This study, which includes the first comparative study of the pathogenicity of these six species in primates, is complementary to earlier studies in rodents in which these schistosomes and their hybrids were compared in terms of egg morphology, snail infectivity, and infectivity and pathogenicity. In rodents, statistically significant differences were detected in the behaviour of each pair of sibling species with regard to percentage worm recovery, rate of egg production and percentage distribution of the eggs in the tissues, and the hybrids also differed significantly from their “parental” species.

Even greater differences were found in baboons. For example, although all the strains studied produced mature egg-laying adults in rodents, no worms, eggs, or histopathological changes resulted from exposure of baboons to S. rodhaini or S. bovis. With regard to prepatent period, S. mansoni was the shortest (5–6 weeks), S. haematobium the longest (12–14 weeks), while S. mattheei and S. intercalatum occupied intermediate positions (7–9 weeks). The hybrids all matured in 7–9 weeks except the S. bovis/S. mattheei hybrid (11–16 weeks). S. haematobium similarly had a much longer maturation time in rodents. Complete or partial “self-cure” occurred in 3 baboons but was not observed in rodents. The percentage worm recovery of S. mansoni was higher than for the S. mansoni/S. rodhaini hybrids while with the S. haematobium group of species, worm recovery was highest with S. mattheei followed by S. intercalatum and S. haematobium, the same order as in rodents. With the S. haematobium-group hybrids, worm recovery was generally high except with the S. bovis/S. haematobiuun hybrid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 1973 , pp. 455 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amin, M. A., Nelson, G. S. and Saoud, M. F. A., 1968.—“Studies on heterologous immunity in schistosomiasis II. Heterologous immunity in rhesus monkeys.” Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 38, 10–27.Google Scholar
Bell, D. R., 1969.—“A new method for counting Schistosoma mansoni eggs in faeces.” Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 29, 525–530Google Scholar
Cheever, A. W., 1969.—“Quantitative comparison of the intensity of Schistosoma mansoni infection in man and experimental animals. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 63, 781–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheever, A. W., AND Powers, K. G., 1968.—“Counting of Schistosoma mansoni eggs in faeces. Comparison of a filtration technique and a dilution technique.” J. Parasit., 54, 632–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheever, A. W., AND Powers, K. G. 1969.—“Schistosoma mansoni infection in rhesus monkeys: changes in egg production and egg distribution in prolonged infections in intact and splenectomised monkeys.” Ann. trop.Med. Parasit., 63, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheever, A. W., AND Powers, K. G., 1971.—“Rate of destruction of Schistosoma mansoni eggs and adult worms in the tissues of rhesus monkeys.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 20, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheever, A. W., AND Powers, K. G., 1972.—“Schistosoma mansoni infection in rhesus monkeys: comparison of the course of heavy and light infections.“ Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 46, 301–309.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheever, A. W.Kirschstein, P. L. and Reardon, L. V., 1970.—“Schistosoma mansoni infection of presumed natural origin in Cercopithecus monkeys from Tanzania and Ethiopia.” Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 42, 486–490.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, E. E. and Mccullouch, F. S., 1954.—“Studies on the life-cycles of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni in the Gold Coast.” Ann. trop.Med. Parasit., 48, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, D. G., Sadun, E. H., Lucia, H. L. and Von Lichtenberg, F., 1971a.—“Schistosoma haematobium infections in five species of primates.” Expl. Parasit., 29, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, D. G., Von Lichtenberg, F., Sadun, E. H., Lucia, H. L. and Hickman, R. L. 1971b.—“Comparison of Schistosoma haematobium, S. mansoni and S. japonicum infections in the owl monkey Aotus trivirgatus.” J. Parasit., 57, 543–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, R. and Broomfield, K. E., 1971.—“Preliminary studies on the development of Schistosoma mansoni in rhesus monkeys following different regimens of infection.” Ann. trop. Hed. Parasit., 65, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fripp, P. J., 1968.—“Some observations on the behaviour of the Kampala strain of S. rodhaini in the laboratory.” S. Afr. J. Med. Sci., 33, 21–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillet, J. and Wolfs, J., 1954.—“Les bilharzioses humaines au Congo Belge et au Ruanda-Urundi.” Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 10, 315–419.Google ScholarPubMed
Hsu, S. Y. L., Hsu, H. F., Chu, K. Y., Tsni, C. T. and Eveland, L. K., 1966.—“Immunisation against Schistosoma haematobium in rhesus monkeys by administration of cercariac of Schistosoma bovis.” Z. tropenined. Parasit., 17, 407–412.Google Scholar
Jordan, P. and Goatly, K. D., 1966.—“Experimental schistosomiasis in primates in Tanzania. I. A preliminary note on the susceptibility of Cercopithecus aethiops centralis to infection with Schistosoma haematobium. and Schislosoma mansoni.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 60, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P., Von Lichtenberg, F. and Goatly, K. D., 1967.—“Experimental schistosomiasis in primates in Tanzania. Preliminary observations on the susceptibility of the baboon Papio anubis to Schislosoma haematobium and Schislosoma mansoni.” Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 37, 393–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuntz, R. E. and Malakatis, G. M., 1955.—“Susceptibility studies in schistosomiasis. III Infection of various experimental hosts with Schistosonma haematobium in Egypt.” Expl. Parasit., 4, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuntz, R. E., Myers, B. J., Moore, J. A. and Huang, T. C., 1971.—“Schistosoina haematobium: experimental infection in Capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella.” Expl. Parasit, 29, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massoud, J. and Nelson, G. S., 1972.—“Studies on heterologous immunity in schistosomiasis. VI. Observations on cross-immunity to Ornithobilharzia turkestanicum, Schistosoma bovis, S. massoni and S. haematobium in mice, sheep and cattle in Iran.”Bull. Wid Huh. Org., 47, 591–600.Google Scholar
Myers, B. J., kuntz, R. E., Huang, T. C. and Moore, J. A.,—1970.—“Urinary bladder involvement in the langur (Presbytes) infected with Schistosoma haematobim (Bilharz, 1852) Weinland, 1858.” Proc. Heinz. Soc., Nash., 37, 189–192.Google Scholar
Muller, R. L. and Taylor, M. G., 1972.—“Use of the Zichl-Neclsen technique for specific identification of schistosome eggs.” J. Helininth., 46, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., Teesdale, C. and Highton, R. B., 1962.—“The role of animals as reservoirs of bilharziasis in Africa” in CIBA Foundation Symposium on Bilharziasis (ed. Wolstenholme, G. E. W. and O' Connor, M.) pp. 127–149. Churchill: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. S. and Saoud, M. F. A., 1966.—“The daily egg output of Schistosoma mansoni in rhesus monkeys.” (Demonstration) Trans. R. Soc. trop. Hied. Hyg., 60, 420–430.Google Scholar
Obuyu, C. K. A., 1970.—“Preliminary communication on gross pathological lesions in the genito-urinary systems of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus acthiops) experimentally infected with Schistosoma haematobium.” Ann. trop. Hed. Parasit., 64, 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obuyu, C. K. A. 1972.—“Experimental S. haematobium infections in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops centralis).” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 66, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitchford, R. J., 1950.—“Cattle schistosomiasis in man in the Eastern Transvaal.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 53, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitchford, R. J., 1905.—“Differences in the egg morphology and certain biological characteristics of some African and Middle Eastern schistosomes, genus Schistosoma, with terminal-spined eggs.” Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org., 32, 105–120.Google Scholar
Powers, K. G. and Cheever, A. W., 1972.—“Comparison of geographical strains of Schistosoma massoni in the rhesus monkey.” Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 46, 205–300.Google Scholar
Powers, K. G., Cheever, A. W., Sadun, E. H., vor Lichitekberg, F. and Bruce, J. L., 1966 —“Susceptibility and comparative pathology of ten species of primates exposed to infection with Schistosoma mansoni.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 15, 705–718.Google Scholar
Powers, K. G., Cheever, A. W., Cheever, A. W. and Erickson, D. G., 1970a.—“Schisto somiasis mansoni in the chimpanzee. The natural history of chronic infections after single and multiple exposures.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 19, 258–77.Google Scholar
Powers, K. G., Cheever, A. W., Cheever, A. W., Erickson, D. G. and Hickman, R. L., 1970b.—“Experimental infection with Schislosoma haematobium in chimpanzees. Parasitologie, clinical, serologic and pathologic observations.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 19, 427–458.Google Scholar
Smithers, S. R. and Terry, R. J., 1965.—“The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of the adult worms.” Parasitology, 55, 605–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. G., 1970.—“Hybridisation experiments on five species of African schistomes.” J. Helminth., 44, 253–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. G., 1972a.—In “What is Schislosoma intercalatum Fisher, 1934?” by Wright, C. A., Southgate, V. R., Knowles, R. J.. (Discussion). Trans. R. Soc. trop Med. myg., 66, 57–59.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G., 1972b.—“Comparative parasitological observations on African schistosomes and their hybrids in experimental infections.” CompiesRendus ler multicolloque de parasitologie Rennes-1 au 4 Septembre, 1971. Rennes, 1972.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G., AND Andrews, B. J., 1973.—“Comparison of the infectivity and pathogenicity of six species of African schistosomes and their hybrids I. in mice and hamsters.” J. Helminth., 47, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. G., AND Saeed, A. A., 1968.—“Schistosoma mansoni and S. matlheei in Cercopithecus aethiops.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. lfed. Hyg., 62, 8.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G., Amin, M. B. A. and Nelson, G. S., 1960.—“‘Parthenogenesis’ in Schislosoma mattheei.” J. Helminth., 43, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. G.Nelson, G. S. and Andrews, B. J., 1972.—“A case of natural infection of S. haematobium in a Senegalese baboon (Paplo sp.)” (Demonstration). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 66, 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, P. E., Meisenhelder, J. E. and Najarian, H. H., 1962.—“Laboratory studies on the effects of tris, p-aminophenyl carboniuxn salts, tris, p-aminophenyl, methanol, and lucanthone hydrochloride against Schislosoma mansoni.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 11, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, H., 1967.—“Experimentelle Infektionen mit Schislosoma haemalobiuns an Mangaben und Schimpansen.” Ann. Soc. Delg. Med. trop. 47, 107–116.Google Scholar
Webbe, G., Nelson, G. S., James, C., Furse, H. and Blackie, E. J., 1972.“Intravenous pyelograms and associated histopathology of baboons infected with Schistosoma haematobium (Nigerian strain)” (Demon.. strations). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 66, 15–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed