Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:23:31.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative study on polypeptide patterns of larvae of Trichinella isolates by two-dimensional electrophoresis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. Garate  and
L. Rivas
T. Garate
Affiliation:
Departmento de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040-Madrid, Spain
L. Rivas
Affiliation:
Unidad de Biomembranas, Instituto de Immunología y Biología Microbiana, Velázquez, 144, 28006–Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The two-dimensional patterns (isoelectrofocusing-IEF/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulphate-SDS) of S3 fractions of muscle larvae of four Trichinella isolates were compared. The comparative study concerned six groups of polypeptides. It was observed that the Garkavi isolate of Trichinella pseudospiralis was clearly different from the other isolates, and it showed the simplest IEF/SDS polypeptide pattern. The C-76 isolate of T. nelsoni had only four of the six groups, distinguishing it from the GM-1 isolate of T. spiralis and the Boev isolate of T. nativa that showed all the indicated groups.

Keywords

Trichinella spiralisTrichinella nelsoniTrichinella nativaTrichinella pseudospiralispolypeptideselectrophoresis
Type
Research Note
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 225 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almond, N. M., Mclaren, D. J. & Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1985) A comparison of the surface and secretions of Trichinella spiralis and T. pseudospiralis. In: Trichinellosis (editor, Kim, C. W.) pp. 151–156. The State University of New York Press: Albany.Google Scholar
Britov, V. A. & Boev, S. N. (1972) Taxonomic rank of various strains of Trichinella and their circulation in nature. Vestnik Akademya Nauki. SSSR, 28, 27–32.Google Scholar
Cellis, J. E. & Bravo, R. (1984) Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins. Methods and Applications. Academic Press. Inc: New York. pp. 487.Google Scholar
Despommier, D. D. & Laccetti, A. (1981) Trichinella spiralis: Proteins and antigens isolated from a large-particle fraction derived from the muscle larva. Experimental Parasitology, 51, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick, T. A. & Chadee, K. (1983) Interbreeding and gene flow in the genus Trichinella. Journal of Parasitology, 69, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dulley, J. R. & Griere, P. A. (1975) A simple technique for eliminating interference by detergents in the Lowry method of protein determination. Analytical Biochemistry, 64, 136–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garkavi, B. L. (1972) Species of Trichinella isolated from wild animals. Veterinariya, 10, 90–91.Google Scholar
Martinzez-Fernandez, A. R., Boev, S. N., Sanmartin-Duran, M. L., Barcena, F. & Arias, C. (1978) Presencia en España de Trichinella nelsoni Britov et Boev, 1972. II Reunión Anual de Parasitólogos Españoles, Madrid, pp 56.Google Scholar
Martinez-Fernandez, A. R. (1978) Algunos efectos de los corticosteroides sobre el ciclo biologico endógeno de Trichinella spiralis. Trabajos compostelanos de Biología, 7, 181–219.Google Scholar
Merril, C. R., Goldman, D. & Van Keuren, M. L. (1982) Simplified silver protein detection and image enhancement methods in polyacrilamide gels. Electrophoresis, 3, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberstein, D. S. & Despommier, D. D. (1984) Antigens from Trichinella spiralis that induce a protective response in the mouse. Journal of Immunology, 132, 898–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed