Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:46:16.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology of Crassicutis cichlasomae, a parasite of cichlid fishes in Mexico and Central America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. Scholz ,
M.C.F. Pech-Ek  and
R. Rodriguez-Canul
T. Scholz
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitolog, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
M.C.F. Pech-Ek
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Carr. Ant. a Progreso Km 6, A.P.73 “Cordeméx”, C.P. 973 10 Mérida, Yucatán, México
R. Rodriguez-Canul
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Carr. Ant. a Progreso Km 6, A.P.73 “Cordeméx”, C.P. 973 10 Mérida, Yucatán, México
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field study on the biology of Crassicutis cichlasomae Manter, 1936 (Digenea: Homalometridae) was carried out in a small swamp in a limestone factory near Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. Aquatic snails, Littorina (Littoridinopsis) angulifera, harbouring C. cichlasomae rediae, cercariae and metacercariae, served both as the first and second intermediate hosts. Feeding experiments confirmed the conspecificity of metacercariae from naturally infected snails with adults from naturally infected fish. Gravid C. cichlasomae worms were obtained from experimentally infected fish 19 days post exposure at 22–24°C. Examination of fish from the swamp in Mitza and other localities in the Yucatan Peninsula showed that the cichlids Cichlasoma urophthalmus and C. meeki were definitive hosts of C. cichlasomae. There was no pronounced preference of C. cichlasomae adults for the site of their location in the intestine of the definitive host; a slightly higher proportion (41%) of worms was only found in the anterior third of the gut. The time of miracidium development varied from 18.5 to 27.5 days; different temperature (20.1–35.7°C) or light/darkness regimes influenced only slightly the rate of embryonic development, with shorter development times at higher temperature (34.8–35.7°C) and constant darkness and/or light. With the exception of the sporocyst, all developmental stages are described and figured.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 69 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bravo-Hollis, M. & Arroyo, G. (1962) Tremátodos de peces de Costa Rica. Sobre dos especies del gėnero Crassicutis Manter, 1936 (Lepocreadiidae Nicoll, 1914) del intestino de Cichlasoma sp. Revue de Biologie Tropicale 10, 229–235.Google Scholar
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I.E. (1969) Parasitological investigations into fish. 108 pp. Leningrad, Publishing House Nauka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Hopkins, S.H. (1934) The papillose Allocreadiidae. Illinois Biological Monographs 13, 45–124.Google Scholar
Hopkins, S.H. (1937) Anew type of allocreadiid cercaria: the cercaria of Anallocreadium and Microcreadium. Journal of Parasitology 23, 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamothe-Argumedo, R. & Pineda-Lopez, R. (1990) Dos géneros y especies nuevos de trematodos (Cryptogonimidae) parásitos de peces de agua dulce de Tabasco, Méx. Universidad y Ciencia 7, 5–13.Google Scholar
Madhavi, R. (1976) Miracidium ofAllocreadiumfasciatusi Kadaji, 1969 (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae). Journal of Parasitology 62, 410–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madhavi, R. (1978) Life history of Allocreadium fasciatusi Kadaji, 1969 (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae) from the freshwater fish Aplocheilus melostigmas. McLelland. Journal of Helminthology 2, 52–59.Google Scholar
Malek, A.E. (1980) Snail-transmitted parasite diseases. 1120 pp. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Malmberg, G. (1957) Om förekomsten av Gyrodactylus pa svenska fiskar. Skrifter utgivna av Södra Sveriges Fiskerifdrening, Arsskrift 1956,19–76.Google Scholar
Manter, H.W. (1936) Some trematodes of cenote fish from Yucatan, in Pearse, A.P., Creaser, E.P. & Hall, F.G. (Eds) The cenotes of Yucatan: a zoological and hydrographic survey. Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G.W., Homes, J.C., Kuris, A.M. & Schad, G.A. (1982) The use of ecological terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists). Journal of Parasitology 68,131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravec, F. & Barus, V. (1971) Studies on parasitic worms from Cuban fishes. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovacae 35, 56–74.Google Scholar
Osorio-Sarabia, V., Pineda-Lopez, R. & Salgado-Maldonado, G. (1987) Fauna helmintolÓgica de peces dulceacuicolas de Tabasco. Estudio preliminar. Universidad y Ciencia 4 (7), 5–31.Google Scholar
Pineda-Lopez, R. & Andrade-Salas, O. (1989) Un nuevo género y especie de tremátodo parásite de Cichlasoma synspilum en la laguna de Santa Anita, Tabasco, México. Anales de Instituto de Biologia, UNAM, Serie Zoologica 59, 21–28.Google Scholar
Pineda-Lopez, R., Caballero, F., Cruz, V., Fucugauchi-Suarez, M.G. & Garcia-Magana, S.L. (1985a) Metazoarios de peces de importancia comercial en la region de los ríos, Tabasco, México, pp. 197–270. in Usumacinta: Investigacion cientifica en la cuenca del Usumacinta. Villahermosa, Tabasco, México, Secretaría de Educación, Culrura y Recreatión.Google Scholar
Pineda-Lopez, R.F., Osorio-Sarabia, D., Almeyda-Artigas, R.J., Perez-Ponce de Leon, G. & Andrade-Salas, O. (1985b) Estudio del control sanitario de la piscifactoría Benito Juárez y en los vasos de las presas de Malpaso y la Angostura, Chiapas. Memoria, Secretaría de Pesca: México D.F., 309 pp.Google Scholar
Salgado-Maldonado, G. (1993) Ecología de los helmintos parásitos de Cichlasoma urophthalmus (Günther) (Pisces: Cichlidae) en la Península de Yucatán. PhD. thesis, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Mérida, 357 pp.Google Scholar
Smyth, J.D. & Halton, J. (1983) The physiology of trematodes. 446 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H.W. (1964) The morphology, life history and systematics of the digenetic trematodes, Homalometron pallidum Stafford, 1904. Biological Bulletin 126,163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinjoy, M., Prieto, A. & Fajer, E. (1986) Parasitofauna de los peces en aguas interiores. Acuicultura. Boletín Tecnico 27,1–11.Google Scholar
Watson, D.E. (1976) Digenea of fishes from Lake Nicaragua, pp. 251–260 in Thorson, T.B. (Ed.) Investigations of the ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan lakes. School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1971) Synopsis of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Parts I, II. 1074 pp.+347 Plts. Tokyo, Keigaku Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1975) A synoptical review of life histories of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. 590 pp.+219 Plts. Tokyo, Keigaku Publishing Co.Google Scholar