Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:32:08.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of antigen capture assays for detecting active filarial antigens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2014

R. Ravishankaran ,
N.S. Radhika ,
L. Ansel Vishal ,
S. Meenakshisundaram ,
A.A. Karande  and
P. Kaliraj
R. Ravishankaran
Affiliation:
Center for Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
N.S. Radhika
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
L. Ansel Vishal
Affiliation:
Center for Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Meenakshisundaram
Affiliation:
Center for Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
A.A. Karande*
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
P. Kaliraj*
Affiliation:
Center for Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
*
*Fax: +91 80 2360 0814 (A.A.K) E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +91 044-22350299 (P.K.) E-mail: [email protected]
*Fax: +91 80 2360 0814 (A.A.K) E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +91 044-22350299 (P.K.) E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lymphatic filariasis is a parasitic disease of tropical countries. This is a disfiguring and painful disease contracted in childhood, but the symptoms become apparent only in later years. Diagnosis of filarial infection is very crucial for the management of the disease. The main objective of this study was to develop a filarial antigen-based immunological assay for the diagnosis and surveillance of the disease. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were raised to the recombinant protein Brugia malayi vespid allergen homologue (VAH). Capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was standardized utilizing various combinations of antibodies and evaluated with serum samples of endemic normal (EN, n= 110), microfilaraemic (MF, n= 65), chronic pathology (CP, n= 45) and non-endemic normal (NEN, n= 10) individuals. Of the 230 samples tested, VAH capture assay detected circulating antigen in 97.91% of bancroftian and 100% of brugian microfilaraemic individuals, and 5% of endemic normal individuals, comparable to the earlier reported SXP-1 antigen detection assay. However, the combination of VAH and SXP-1 (VS) capture ELISA was found to be more robust, detecting 100% of microfilaraemic individuals and with higher binding values. Thus an antigen capture immunoassay has been developed, which can differentiate active infection from chronic infection by detecting circulating filarial antigens in clinical groups of endemic areas.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 352 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaru, D.E. & Denham, D.A. (1976) Laboratory evaluation of a new technique for counting microfilariae in blood. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70, 333–334.Google Scholar
Anand, S.B., Gnanasekar, M., Thangadurai, M., Prabhu, P.R., Kaliraj, P. & Ramaswamy, K. (2007) Immune response studies with Wuchereria bancrofti vespid allergen homologue (WbVAH) in human lymphatic filariasis. Parasitology Research 101, 981–988.Google ScholarPubMed
Baskar, L.K., Srikanth, T.R., Suba, S., Mody, H.C., Desai, P.K. & Kaliraj, P. (2004) Development and evaluation of a rapid flow-through immuno filtration test using recombinant filarial antigen for diagnosis of brugian and bancroftian filariasis. Microbiology and Immunology 48, 519–525.Google Scholar
Bennuru, S., Semnani, R., Meng, Z., Ribeiro, J.M., Veenstra, T.D. & Nutman, T.B. (2009) Brugia malayi excreted/secreted proteins at the host/parasite interface: stage- and gender-specific proteomic profiling. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, e410.Google Scholar
Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.Google Scholar
Chularerk, P. & Desowitz, R.S. (1970) A simplified membrane filtration technique for the diagnosis of microfilaremia. Journal of Parasitology 56, 623–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desowitz, R.S. & Hitchcock, J.C. (1974) Hyperendemic bancroftian filariasis in the Kingdom of Tonga: the application of the membrane filter concentration technique to an age-stratified blood survey. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 23, 877–879.Google Scholar
Friguet, B., Chaffotte, A.F., Djavadi-Ohaniance, L. & Goldberg, M.E. (1985) Measurements of the true affinity constant in solution of antigen-antibody complexes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of Immunological Methods 77, 305–319.Google Scholar
Gangatirkar, P., Gangadharan, S., Narendranath, A., Nagpal, S., Salunke, D.M. & Karande, A.A. (2002) Monoclonal antibodies to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) inhibit binding of the hormone to its receptor. Hybridoma and Hybridomics 21, 281–286.Google Scholar
Harlow, E. & Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: a laboratory manual. 2nd edn. 100 pp. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Janardhan, S., Pandiaraja, P., Thirugnanam, S., Balamurali, M.N., Fernando, K., Mody, H.C., Desai, P.K., Meenakshisundaram, S. & Kaliraj, P. (2007) Production, purification and diagnostic application of filarial recombinant protein WbSXP-1 expressed in salt inducible Escherichia coli . Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 34, 675–683.Google Scholar
Kluber, S., Supali, T., Williams, S.A., Liebau, E. & Fischer, P. (2001) Rapid PCR-based detection of Brugia malayi DNA from blood spots by DNA Detection Test Strips. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 95, 169–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalitha, P., Eswaran, D., Gnanasekar, M., Rao, K.V., Narayanan, R.B., Scott, A., Nutman, T. & Kaliraj, P. (2002) Development of antigen detection ELISA for the diagnosis of brugian and bancroftian filariasis using antibodies to recombinant filarial antigens Bm-SXP-1 and Wb-SXP-1. Microbiology and Immunology 46, 327–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCall, J.W., Malone, J.B., Hyong-Sun, A. & Thompson, P.E. (1973) Mongolian jirds (Meriones unguiculatus) infected with Brugia pahangi by the intraperitoneal route: a rich source of developing larvae, adult filariae, and microfilariae. Journal of Parasitology 59, 436.Google Scholar
Michael, E. & Bundy, D.A. (1997) Global mapping of lymphatic filariasis. Trends in Parasitology 13, 472–476.Google ScholarPubMed
More, S.J. & Copeman, D.B. (1990) A highly specific and sensitive monoclonal antibody-based ELISA for the detection of circulating antigen in bancroftian filariasis. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 41, 403–406.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, J., Gregory, W.F., Gomez-Escobar, N., Atmadja, A.K. & Maizels, R.M. (2001) Expression and immune recognition of Brugia malayi VAL-1, a homologue of vespid allergens and Ancylostoma secreted proteins. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 118, 89–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Pandey, V., Madhumathi, J., Karande, A.A. & Kaliraj, P. (2011) Antigen detection assay with parasite specific monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis of lymphatic filariasis. Clinica Chimica Acta 412, 1867–1873.Google Scholar
Pani, S.P., Hoti, S.L., Elango, A., Yuvaraj, J., Lall, R. & Ramaiah, K.D. (2000) Evaluation of the ICT whole blood antigen card test to detect infection due to nocturnally periodic Wuchereria bancrofti in South India. Tropical Medicine and International Health 5, 359–363.Google Scholar
Rahmah, N., Nurulhasanah, O., Norhayati, S., Zulkarnain, I. & Norizan, M. (2010) Comparison of conventional versus real-time PCR detection of Brugia malayi DNA from dried blood spots from school children in a low endemic area. Tropical Biomedicine 27, 54–59.Google Scholar
Ramaiah, K.D., Das, P.K., Michael, E. & Guyatt, H. (2000) The economic burden of lymphatic filariasis in India. Parasitology Today 6, 251–253.Google Scholar
Rao, K.V., Eswaran, M., Ravi, V., Gnanasekhar, B., Narayanan, R.B., Kaliraj, P., Jayaraman, K., Marson, A., Raghavan, N. & Scott, A.L. (2000) The Wuchereria bancrofti orthologue of Brugia malayi SXP1 and the diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 107, 71–80.Google Scholar
Weil, G.J., Lammie, P.J. & Weiss, N. (1997) The ICT Filariasis Test: A rapid-format antigen test for diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. Parasitology Today 13, 401–404.Google Scholar
WHO. (2010) WHO GPELF progress report 2000–2009 and strategic plan 2010–2020. Geneva, WHO.Google Scholar