Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T04:28:35.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870) in Dogs in Lahore, West Pakistan*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Martin S. Wolfe
Affiliation:
University of Maryland International Centre for Medical Research and Training—Pakistan Medical Research Centre, Lahore, West Pakistan
M. Aslamkhan
Affiliation:
University of Maryland International Centre for Medical Research and Training—Pakistan Medical Research Centre, Lahore, West Pakistan
M. Sharif
Affiliation:
University of Maryland International Centre for Medical Research and Training—Pakistan Medical Research Centre, Lahore, West Pakistan
E. Pervez
Affiliation:
University of Maryland International Centre for Medical Research and Training—Pakistan Medical Research Centre, Lahore, West Pakistan

Extract

Twenty-three (9%) of 255 domesticated dogs surveyed in Lahore, West Pakistan, were blood positive for microfilariae. Twenty-one (8·2%) had either pure or mixed infections with Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides. Dirofilaria repens microfilariae were present in 4 dogs and one had Dirofilaria immitis microfilariae. A single adult A. dracunculoides was found from the hind leg of an autopsied dog with A. dracunculoides microfilariae. Microfilariae had a diurnal periodicity in this animal. There is only one previous documented report of A. dracunculoides adult worms from a dog in the Indian subcontinent, but it is possible that microfilariae earlier described from India under other names may also have represented this species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azevedo, J. F. De, 1943.—“On the presence of Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870) among dogs in Portugal: contribution to the study of its morphology.” Ann. Inst. Med. Trop., Lisbon, 1, 105114.Google Scholar
Durrani, M. Z., Chaudhry, N. I., and Chaudhry, M. N., 1965.—“Survey of microfilariae in Lyallpur dogs.” Proceedings of the 17th Pakistan Science Conference,Karachi, Abstract p. A62.Google Scholar
Jayewardene, L. G., 1962.—“On Two filarial parasites from dogs in Ceylon, Brugia ceylonensis n.sp. and Dipetalonema sp. inq.” J. Helminth., 36, 269280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korke, V. T., 1924.—“On a new microfilaria from the dog, Microfilaria lewisi (N.S.).” Indian J. Med. Res., 11, 12311237.Google Scholar
Lindsey, J. R., 1961.—“Diagnosis of filarial infections in dogs. I. Microfilarial surveys.” J. Parasit., 47, 695702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, J. R., 1962.—“Diagnosis of filarial infections in dogs. II. Confirmation of microfilarial identifications.” J. Parasit., 48, 321326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., 1963.—“Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870), from the dog in Kenya: with a note on its development in the louse-fly, Hippobosca longipennis.” J. Helminth., 37, 235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, W. L. and Wright, W. H., 1956.—“The occurrence of a dog filariid other than Dirofilaria immitis in the United States.” J. Parasit., 42, 246258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, M. A. N., 1923.—Imp. Inst. Agri. Res. Bull. No. 144.Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N., 1938.—“Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870).” Indian J. vet. Sci., 8, 127130.Google Scholar
Sadighian, A., 1969.—“Helminth parasites of stray dogs and jackals in Shahsavar area, Caspian Region, Iran.” J. Parasit., 55, 372374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, T. K., Weinstein, P. P., and Block, J., 1963.—“Canine filariasis: the influence of method of treatment on measurements of microfilariae in blood samples.” Am. J. vet. Res., 24, 395401.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, D., Krishnaswami, A. K., and Raghavan, N. G. S., 1958.—“A new microfilaria in the dog.” Indian J. Malar., 12, 8992.Google ScholarPubMed