Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:02:38.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Renicola glacialis sp. nov., a New Trematode from the North Sea Fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis (L.), with Observations on its Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J. Riley  and
R. Wynne Owen
J. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, The University, Dundee Department of Zoology, The University, Leeds
R. Wynne Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, The University, Dundee Department of Zoology, The University, Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new species Renicola glacialis sp. nov., belonging to the trematode genus Renicola, is described.

The species is distinguished from most other renicolids by its relatively large size. Two other species within this size range have been recorded; while it is easy to separate R. glacialis from one of these species (R. goliath Wright, 1957) the poor description of the other (R. secunda Skrjabin, 1924) renders a detailed comparison meaningless. However, the differences in host and geographic location between this and R. glacialis are considered sufficiently great to justify the erection of a new species.

The pathology of R. glacialis is discussed; recently established worms elicit only a slight host tissue response, but older infections are invested by a thick connective tissue sheath. The latter shows maximum development around dead worms and is accompanied by pronounced eosinophilia.

Attention has been drawn to the use of the excretory vesicle as a diagnostic character. Four distinctly different forms have been described, and it is suggested that this character, together with certain other morphological features, would provide a useful key for the identification of renicolids once such information is available.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , March 1972 , pp. 63 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cohn, L., 1904.—“Helminthologische Mitteilungen. II.”. Arch. Nalurgesch., 1, 229–252.Google Scholar
Dawes, B., 1903.—“Hyperplasia of the bile duct in fascioliasis and its relation to the problem of nutrition in the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L.” Parasitology, 53, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1946.—“Sur un distome du genre Tamerlania K. I. Skrjabin, 1924 avec un catalogue des trematodes des reins d'oiseaux.” Annls. Parasit. hum. comp., 21, 25–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubanov, N. M. 1954.—“Die Helminthenfauna wirtschaftlich venvenbarcr Tiere des Ochtotskischen Meeres und des Stillen Ozeans.” Trudy gel'mint. Lab., 7, 380–381.Google Scholar
Odening, K., 1902.—“Neue Trematoden aus vietnamesischen Volgeln des Berliner Tierparks.” Bijdr. Dierk., 32, 49–63.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., 1924. “Niercntrematoden der VogelRusslands.” Centralbl. Bakt. Parasit., 62, 80–90.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W., 1964.—“Studies on the trematode genus Remcola; observations on the life-history, specificity, and systematic position.” Biol. Bull., 126, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timon-David, J., 1933.—“Sur une nouvelle espece de Renicola trematode parasite du rein des larides.” Bull. Inst, oceanogr. Monaco, 616, 1–16.Google Scholar
Timon-David, J., 1952. “Un Renicola nouveau chez La Pie.” Bull. Soc. tool. Fr., 77, 504–511.Google Scholar
Witenberg, G., 1929. “Parasitische Würmer von Puffinus kuhli”. In Bodenheimer und Theodor, Ergebnisse der Sinai-Expedition, 1927, der Hebräischen Universität, Jerusalem, 118-124. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1954a. “Trematodes of the genus Renicola from birds in British Zoos with descriptions of the two new species.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 124, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1954b.—“Trematodes of the genus Renicola from the kidneys of birds in Brazil.” Rev. Brazil. Biol., 14, 61–64.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1956.—“Studies on the life-history and ecology of the trematode genus Renicola Cohn 1904”. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 126, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1957.—“Two kidney flukes from Sudanese birds, with a description of a new species.” J. Helminth., 31, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed