Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:08:21.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovery of Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus (Cobb, 1919) Goodey, 1960 from Coconut Tissues*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

D. W. Fenwick
D. W. Fenwick
Affiliation:
Trinidad and Tobago Coconut Research Station, Eastern Main Road, Champs Fleurs, Trinidad W.I
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Early literature on Red Ring disease of coconuts, caused by the nematode Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus (Cobb, 1919) Goodey, 19C0, has been reviewed by the writer (Fenwick 1957). Little information is available however on the techniques used, and investigation has shown that the extraction of these nematodes from different types of coconut tissue presents problems which are not dealt with in Goodey's (1957) review of nematological technique. It is felt that the techniques developed by the writer for this worm might be of interest to other workers who are concerned with the extraction of very slender active nematodes from hard plant tissues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 37 , Issue 1-2 , March 1963 , pp. 11 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cobb, N. A., 1919.—“A newly discovered nematodc Aphelenchus cocophihts n. sp. connected with a serious disease of the coconut palm.” W. Ind. Bull., 17, 203–210.Google Scholar
Fallis, A. M., 1943.—“Use of the Waring blender to separate small parasites from tissues.” Canad. publ. Hlth. J., 34, 44.Google Scholar
Fenwick, D. W., 1951.—“A new modification of the McMaster slide for use in potato-root celworm investigations.” J. Helminth., 25, 173–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, D. W., 1957.—“Red Ring Disease of Coconuts in Trinidad and Tobago.” Col. Office Report (40617–1).Google Scholar
Goodey, J. B., 1957.—“Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes.” H.M. Stationery Office, Tech. Bull., 2.Google Scholar
Goodey, J. B., 1960.—“Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus (Cobb, 1919) n.comb., the nematode associated with ‘Red Ring’ disease of Coconut.” Nematologica, 5, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1952.—“Toxicity tests with vinegar eelworm (1) Counting and Culturing.” J. Helminth., 26, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiniiorst, J. W., 1950.—“De betekenis van de toestand van de grond voor het optreden van aantasting door het stengelaaltje (Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kühnn) Filipjev).” Tijdschr. PtZiekt., 58,103–108.Google Scholar
Seiniiorst, J. W., 1956.—“Een eenvoudige methode voor het afscheidcn van aaltjes uit grond.” Tijdschr. PtZiekt., 61, 188–190.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. L. and Loegering, W. Q., 1953.—“Nematodes associated with root lesions in Abaca.” Turrialba, 3, 8–13.Google Scholar