Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:16:09.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public health implications of soil contaminated with helminth eggs in the metropolis of Kaduna, Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

B.V. Maikai ,
J.U. Umoh ,
O.J. Ajanusi  and
I. Ajogi
B.V. Maikai*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
J.U. Umoh
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
O.J. Ajanusi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
I. Ajogi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Environmental and socio-cultural variables influencing the distribution of helminth eggs in 608 soil samples were studied in 14 playgrounds that differ in socio-economic status in Kaduna metropolis, Nigeria, using a modified sieving method and a sucrose flotation medium of specific gravity 1.27. Helminth eggs were found in 62% of the soil samples and the distribution was as follows: Toxocara spp. 50.4%, Taenia spp./Echinococcus spp. 36.9%, Dipylidium caninum 26.3%, Ancylostoma spp. 9.0%, Ascaris spp. 7.2%, Trichuris spp. 3.7% and Ascaridia spp. 1.9%. A higher prevalence (68.1%) was recorded during the dry harmattan period while in the rainy period the rate was 58.1%. Mean egg densities ranged from 1.11 ± 0.32 to 3.92 ± 2.47 in areas moderately rated. Samples from site 14, which was highly rated, were more contaminated (78.1%) than those collected from other sites, while the intensity of contamination (14.0%) was more in moderately rated site 4 than in the rest of the sites. There were significant associations between the prevalence of helminth eggs and rainy period of the study (odds ratio (OR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) on OR: 0.20 < OR < 0.70), presence of dogs (OR = 0.56; 95% CI on OR: 0.37 < OR < 0.85) and grass (vegetation) (OR = 1.44; 95% CI on OR: 1.03 < OR < 2.04) in the sites. On the other hand, there was no association between the prevalence of helminth eggs and the dry period of the study, presence of refuse in the playgrounds, topography of playgrounds, depth of sample collection and socio-economic status of people in playgrounds (P>0.05). This study shows that the period of study, the presence of dogs and vegetation influence the prevalence of helminth eggs in soil in Kaduna metropolis.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 113 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castillo, D., Paredes, C., Zanartu, C., Castilo, G., Mercado, R., Munoz, V. & Schenone, H. (2000) Contaminacion ambiental por huevos de Toxocara spp. en algunas publicos de Santiago de Chile, 1999. Boletin Chileno de Parasitologia 55, 86–91(in Spanish with English abstract).Google Scholar
Childs, J.E. (1985) The prevalence of Toxocara species ova in backyards and gardens of Baltimore, Maryland. American Journal of Public Health 75, 1092–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cifuentes, E., Blumentthal, U., Ruiz-Palacios, G., Bennett, S. & Pesaey, A. (1994) Escenario epidemiologico del uso agricola del agua residualelvalle del mezquital, Mexico salud publica. Mexicana 36, 3–9.Google Scholar
Dean, A.G. (1994) A course in micro computer use for epidemiologist and others who count things using EPI INFO. Atlanta, USA, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program office.Google Scholar
Despommier, D. (2003) Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clinical Microbiology Review 6, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duniya, D. (2000) Prevalence of geohelminth eggs in the stool of selected primary school pupils and soil of the school environment in Zariya. Unpublished MSc thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.Google Scholar
Enesi, A.O. (2001) Effects of multidimensional learning variables on ‘O’ level English under achievers. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.Google Scholar
Etim, S.E. & Akpan, P.A. (1999) Studies on geophagy as risk factor for geohelminthiasis in Calaber, Cross River State, Nigeria. The Nigeria Journal of Parasitology 20, 91–98.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. (2003) Toxocaraa cati: an underestimated zoonotic agent. Trends in Parasitology 19, 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garavelli, P.L. & Scaglione, L. (1989) Blastocytosis. An epidemiological study. Microbiologica 12, 349–350.Google ScholarPubMed
Habluetzel, A., Traldi, G., Ruggieri, S., Attili, A.R., Scuppa, P., Marchetti, R., Menghini, G. & Esposito, F. (2003) An estimation of Toxocara canis prevalence in dogs, environmental egg contamination and risk of human infection in the Marche region of Italy. Veterinary Parasitology 113, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrix, C.M., Bruce, H.S., Kellman, N.J., Harrelson, G. & Bruhn, B.F. (1996) Cutaneous larva migrans and enteric hookworm infection. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 209 (10), 1763–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrar, Z.A. & Rahim, K.A. (1995) Prevalence and risk factors of parasitic infections among under five Sudanese children. A community based study. The East African Medical Journal 72 (2), 103–109.Google ScholarPubMed
Katakura, K., Hamada, J. & Kobayashi, A. (1986) The fate of Ascaris eggs applied to the soil under various conditions. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 35, 1–9.Google Scholar
Laborde, C., Bussieras, J. & Chemette, R. (1980) Reserche des oeufs de Toxocara spp. des jardins publics de Paris. Prophylaxie des infestations humaines. Recueil de Medicine Veterinaire 15, 733–738.Google Scholar
Mahdi, N.K. & Ali, H.A. (1993) Toxocara eggs in the soil of public places and school in Basrah, Iraq. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 87, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malgor, R., Oku, Y., Gallardo, R. & Yarzabal, I. (1996) High prevalence of Ancylostoma spp. infection in dogs, associated with endemic focus of human cutaneous larva migrans, in Tacuarembo, Umguay. Parasite (3/2), 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, J. & Nakashio, S. (2005) Prevalence of faecal contamination in sandpits in public parks in Sapporo city, Japan. Veterinary Parasitology 128 (1–2), 115–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minvielle, M.C., Pezzani, B.C. & Basualdo Farjat, J.A. (1993) Frequency of finding helminth egg in canine stool samples collected in public places in La Plata city, Argentina. Boletin Chileno de Parasitologia 48, 63–65.Google Scholar
Mizgajska, H. (2001) Eggs of Toxocara spp. in the environment and their public health implications. Journal of Helminthology 75, 147–151.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrison, G. (2001) Zoonotic infections from pets, understanding the risks and treatment. Postgraduate Education 110, 24–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motazedian, H., Mehrabani, D., Tabatabaee, S.H.R., Pakniat, A. & Tavalali, M. (2006) Prevalence of helminth ova in soil samples from public places in Shiraz. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 12 (5), 562–563.Google ScholarPubMed
NIMET (Nigerian Meteorological Agency) (2005) Meteorological data for year 2005. Kawo, Kaduna, Federal Secretariate.Google Scholar
NIMET (Nigerian Meteorological Agency) (2006) Meterological data for year 2006. Kawo, Kaduna, Federal Secretariate.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Ybanez, M.R., Garijo, M.M., Goyena, M. & Alonso, F. (2000) Improved methods for recovering eggs of Toxocara canis from soil. Journal of Helminthology 74, 349–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz de Ybanez, M.R., Garijo, M.M. & Alonso, F.D. (2001) Prevalence and viability of eggs of Toxocara spp. and Toxascaris leonina in public parks in eastern Spain. Journal of Helminthology 75, 25–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Sam-Wobo, S.O. & Mafiana, C.F. (2004) The effects of surface soil exchangeable cations on the prevalence of Ascris Iumbricoides in Ogun State, Nigeria. The Nigerian Society for Parasitology 25, 25–31.Google Scholar
Schantz, P.M. (1991) Parasitic zoonosis in perspective. International Journal of Parasitology 21, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schantz, P.M. (1994) Of worms, dogs, and human host: continuing education for veterinarians in prevention of human disease. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 204, 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.E., Hagstad, H.V. & Beard, G.B. (1984) A risk assessment in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. International Journal of Zoonoses 11, 189–194.Google ScholarPubMed
Soulsby, E.J.I. (1987) Larva migrans in perspective. pp. 137–145in Geerts, S.et al. (Eds) Helminth zoonoses. Dordecht, Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uga, S., Minami, T. & Nagarta, K. (1996) Defecation habits of cats and dogs and contamination by Toxocara eggs in public parks sandpits. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 54, 122–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ukoli, F.M.A. (1992) Prevention and control of parasitic diseases in tropical Africa. 1st edn.pp. 13, 102–108, 113–114, Ibadan, Nigeria, University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, M.S., Simeon, D.T., Powel, C.A. & Grantham McGregor, S.M. (1994) Geohelminth infections in school-aged children in Jamaica. West Indian Medical Journal 43, 121–125.Google ScholarPubMed