Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:40:20.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Morphology of Schistosoma rodhaini from Kenya*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

M. F. A. Saoud
M. F. A. Saoud
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The original description of Schistosoma rodhaini was based on the examination of one adult male, two adult females and one young male (Brumpt, 1931). Fain et al. (1953) reported that the measurements of worms from natural infections in Ruanda-Urundi did not correspond to those given by Brumpt in 1931. They maintained that, in experimental infections, the variations in the length of the worms were more notable; being generally smaller than those collected from natural infections. Also they reported similar differences in the measurements of eggs.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 40 , Issue 1-2 , June 1966 , pp. 147 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brumpt, E., 1930.—“La ponte des schistosomes”. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 8, 263–297.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E., 1931.—“Description de deux bilharzies de mammiféres africains, Schistosoma curassoni sp. inquir. et Schistosoma rodhaini n.sp.” Ibidem., 9, 325–338.Google Scholar
Fain, A., Thienpont, D., Herin, V. and Deramee, O., 1953.—“Observations sur Schistosoma rodhaini Brumpt au Ruanda—Urundi et le description de la cercairc de ce schistosome.” Ann. Soc. beige Med. trop., 33, 423–443.Google Scholar
Fairley, N. H., 1920.—“A comparative study of experimental bilharziasis in monkeys contrasted with hitherto described lesions in man.” J. Path. Bact., 23, 289–314.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C., Jones, C. A. and Hoffman, W. A., 1934.—“Studies on schistosomiasis mansoni in Puerto Rico. III. Biological studies. 2. The mammalian phase of the life cycle.” Puerto Rico J. publ. Hlth. trop. Med., 10, 133–196.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S., Teesdale, C. and Highton, R. B., 1962.—“The role of animals as reservoirs of bilharziasis in Africa.” In: Ciba Foundation Symposium on Bilharziasis. London., 127–149.Google Scholar
Pitchford, R. J., 1965.—“Differences in the egg morphology and certain biological characteristics of some African and Middle Eastern schistosomes, genus Schistosoma, with terminal-spined eggs”. Bull. Wld. Hlth Org., 32, 105–120.Google ScholarPubMed
Schwetz, J., 1954.—“On two schistosomes of wild rodents of the Belgian Congo: Schistosoma rodhaini Brumpt, 1931 and Schistosoma mansoni var. rodentorum Schwetz, 1953 and their relationship to S. mansoni of man”. Trans, roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 48, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwetz, J., 1956.—“Some new comparative investigations on three Physopsis borne schistosomes: Schistosoma haematobium, S. bovis and S. intercalalum.” Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 5, 1071–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar